Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleB & P Company, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service
DistrictSouthern District of Ohio
CityDayton
Case Number3:2014cv00232
Date Filed2014-07-16
Date Closed2015-07-20
JudgeJudge Walter H Rice
PlaintiffB & P Company, Inc.
PlaintiffJames Wright
Case DescriptionB&P Company submitted a FOIA request to the IRS for all Revenue Agent Reports related to B&P from 1990 through 2013. The agency told B&P that it had located 41 responsive pages but was withholding them entirely under Exemption 7(A) (interference with ongoing investigation or proceeding). B&P appealed the denial, which was upheld on appeal. James Wright submitted a FOIA request to the IRS for records related to the agency's claim that Wright owed $505,000 in restitution. The agency denied Wright's request based on Exemption 5 (privileges), Exemption 3 (other statutes), and Exemption 7(A). Wright appealed the agency's denial, which was upheld on appeal. B&P Company and Wright then filed suit.
Complaint issues: Exemption 3, Exemption 5 - Privileges, Exemption 7(A)

DefendantInternal Revenue Service
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
Complaint attachment 2
Complaint attachment 3
Complaint attachment 4
Complaint attachment 5
Complaint attachment 6
Complaint attachment 7
Complaint attachment 8
Complaint attachment 9
Complaint attachment 10
Opinion/Order [24]
FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in Ohio has ruled that the IRS properly withheld records from B & P Company pertaining to its investigation of whether James Wright has a substantial ownership interest in the company and should be investigated for tax evasion under Exemption 5 (deliberative process privilege) and Exemption 7(A) (ongoing investigation or proceedings). The court also found the agency had conducted an adequate search for records requested by Wright pertaining to a 1999 judgment against him. When B & P Company and Wright received notice from the IRS that Wright owed $505,000 in restitution in connection with a 1999 judgment against him for tax evasion, both Wright and the company filed FOIA requests with the IRS for relevant documents. The only document responsive to B & P's request was a 41-page draft Revenue Agent Report. The agency withheld the report under Exemption 5 and Exemption 7(A). B & P conceded that the document was both predecisional and deliberative, but argued that since it did not pertain to Wright's criminal investigation its disclosure would not harm the agency. The court rejected the argument, noting that the agency's affidavit explained that "a freeze hold had been placed on B & P's audit 'because James L. Wright is under criminal investigation and he has an ownership interest, either direct or indirect, in B & P.'" Turning to the Exemption 7(A) claim, the court indicated that "the IRS has satisfied its burden of proving that disclosure of the draft RAR, which was compiled solely for law enforcement purposes, could interfere with enforcement proceedings, and would seriously impair Federal tax administration." After conducting a search for records pertaining to the 1999 judgment against Wright in several offices that were most likely to have the records, the IRS concluded that the records had been destroyed pursuant to the agency's ten-year retention policy. The IRS produced a 2004 probation officer's report on Wright that indicated that he still owed $501,000 in July 2004. The court pointed out that "this report corroborates the IRS's position that the amount of restitution owed by Wright was calculated prior to July of 2004, and explains why document responsive to Wright's FOIA requests no longer exist."
Issues: Exemption 5 - Privileges - Deliberative process privilege - Deliberative, Exemption 7(A) - Interference with ongoing investigation, Adequacy - Search
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2014-07-161COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief against Internal Revenue Service ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-4650500), filed by B & P Company, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Summons Form, # 10 Civil Cover Sheet) (Henderson, Toby) (Entered: 07/16/2014)
2014-07-162MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Robert G. Bernhoft (Filing fee $ 200, receipt number 0648-4650545) by Plaintiffs B & P Company, Inc., James Wright. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate in Good Standing) (Henderson, Toby) (Entered: 07/16/2014)
2014-07-163Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiffs B & P Company, Inc., James Wright. (Henderson, Toby) (Entered: 07/16/2014)
2014-07-164MOTION for Leave for Robert G. Bernhoft to Act as Trial Attorney by Plaintiffs B & P Company, Inc., James Wright. (Henderson, Toby) (Entered: 07/16/2014)
2014-07-17NOTATION ORDER sustaining 2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Robert G. Bernhoft. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 7/17/2014. (jdf1) (Entered: 07/17/2014)
2014-07-17NOTATION ORDER sustaining 4 Motion for Leave for Robert G. Bernhoft to Act as Trial Attorney. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 7/17/2014. (jdf1) (Entered: 07/17/2014)
2014-07-225Summons Issued as to Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (srb1) (Entered: 07/22/2014)
2014-07-22...Notice, if case is to be referred, it will be Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington. (srb1) (Entered: 07/22/2014)
2014-08-226MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 10/9/2014. by Defendant Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Schutte, Margaret) (Entered: 08/22/2014)
2014-08-267RESPONSE to Motion re 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 10/9/2014. Notice of Non-Opposition filed by Plaintiffs B & P Company, Inc., James Wright. (Bernhoft, Robert) (Entered: 08/26/2014)
2014-08-27NOTATION ORDER sustaining 6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 8/27/2014. (jdf1) (Entered: 08/27/2014)
2014-08-27NOTICE OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE: Preliminary Telephone Conference set for 10/20/2014 at 4:15 PM before Judge Walter H Rice. Prior to the pretrial conference counsel must comply with the MANDATORY DISCLOSURE RULES of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) and the MANDATORY, pre-preliminary pretrial conference between counsel, required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). NOTE...the format for the Rule 26(f) conference between counsel and the Report to the court has been altered. This new form is available on line and MUST be utilized in this case. The Report must be filed 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE. In all cases with class action allegations, the parties shall include in their Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) report proposed deadlines for completing discovery relevant to those allegations and for filing a motion to certify a class, and a proposed date for class action determination. Pretrial procedures and forms can be found at our website at www.ohsd.uscourts.gov. Should more attorneys be actively involved than those listed on the Court's docket, please notify the Courtroom Deputy, Cindy Fugate, at 937-512-1501, immediately, to include the additional attorneys in the Preliminary Pretrial Telephone Conference. If you wish a number other than your office number called, please advise 24 hours preceding the conference. (jdf1) (Entered: 08/27/2014)
2014-09-128NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph E. Hunsader for Defendant Internal Revenue Service (Hunsader, Joseph) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
2014-10-099ANSWER to 1 Complaint, filed by Internal Revenue Service. (Hunsader, Joseph) (Entered: 10/09/2014)
2014-10-1410RULE 26(f) REPORT Joint Report of the Parties by Plaintiffs B & P Company, Inc., James Wright. (Bernhoft, Robert) (Entered: 10/14/2014)
2014-10-20Minute Entry for Preliminary Pretrial Telephone Conference held on 10/20/2014. (Scheduling Entry to be filed shortly.) (jdf1) (Entered: 10/20/2014)
2014-10-2711NOTICE of Appearance by Brandi M. Stewart for Defendant Internal Revenue Service (Stewart, Brandi) (Entered: 10/27/2014)
2014-12-0212PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Case is referred to Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington: Written notification to Court re: contingent consent or refusal to Magistrate Judge for trial purposes only: close of business 12/15/2014; Amended Pleadings due by 12/10/2014. Motions directed to pleadings due by 12/10/2014 Pltf - 1/7/15 Deft. Proposed Final Pretrial Order due by 6/23/2015. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/30/2015 at 5:00 PM by Teleconference before Judge Walter H Rice. Exhibit Submission for Trial or Hearing due by 6/26/2015. Jury Trial set for 7/13/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 1 - Dayton before Judge Walter H Rice.. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 12/2/14. (pb1) (Entered: 12/02/2014)
2014-12-1513NOTICE by Plaintiffs B & P Company, Inc., James Wright of Refusal to Consent and Reference This Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge (Bernhoft, Robert) (Entered: 12/15/2014)
2015-02-1114MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 3/20/2015. to file defendant's summary judgment motion by Defendant Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Hunsader, Joseph) (Entered: 02/11/2015)
2015-02-1215ORDER granting 14 Motion for Extension of Time - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment is to be filed no later than March 20, 2015, and that plaintiff's opposition and cross-motion, if any, are to be filed no later than April 17, 2015. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 02/12/15. (pb1) (Entered: 02/12/2015)
2015-03-2016MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Internal Revenue Service. Responses due by 4/13/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Kathy Enstrom Declaration, # 2 Affidavit Gail Minauro Declaration, # 3 Affidavit Elizabeth Rawlins Declaration, # 4 Supplement IRS's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, # 5 Text of Proposed Order) (Hunsader, Joseph) (Entered: 03/20/2015)
2015-03-2017BRIEF re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Internal Revenue Service. (Hunsader, Joseph) (Entered: 03/20/2015)
2015-04-0818Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 5/15/2015. to respond to Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion (Doc. No. 16). by Plaintiffs B & P Company, Inc., James Wright. (Bernhoft, Robert) (Entered: 04/08/2015)
2015-04-10NOTATION ORDER sustaining 18 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 4/10/2015. (jdf1) (Entered: 04/10/2015)
2015-05-1519RESPONSE in Opposition re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiffs B & P Company, Inc., James Wright. (Attachments: # 1 Response to Statement of Facts and Proposed Undisputed Facts, # 2 Declaration of Daniel J. Treuden, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B) (Bernhoft, Robert) (Entered: 05/15/2015)
2015-06-0320MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 6/15/2015. (Extension to file summary judgment reply currently due June 6, 2015) by Defendant Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Hunsader, Joseph) (Entered: 06/03/2015)
2015-06-0321ORDER granting 20 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 06/03/15. (pb) (Entered: 06/03/2015)
2015-06-1522REPLY to Response to Motion re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit) (Hunsader, Joseph) (Entered: 06/15/2015)
2015-06-2923Joint MOTION to Continue All Deadlines and Hearings by Plaintiffs B & P Company, Inc., James Wright. (Bernhoft, Robert) (Entered: 06/29/2015)
2015-06-30NOTATION ORDER sustaining 23 Motion to Continue. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 6/30/2015. (jdf) (Entered: 06/30/2015)
2015-07-2024DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFFS' FOIA CLAIMS (DOC. # 16 ); JUDGMENT TO ENTER ACCORDINGLY; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 7/20/15. (pb) (Entered: 07/20/2015)
2015-07-2025CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed on 7/20/15. (pb) (Entered: 07/20/2015)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar