Case Detail

FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Amit Mehta has ruled that the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration properly withheld personally-identifying information under Exemption 6 (invasion of privacy) about third parties mentioned in records concerning the IG's investigation of several IRS staffers who dealt with Richard Goldstein's attorney David Capes in relation to Goldstein's allegations that his sister and her attorney had evaded taxes on capital gains from their father's estate and trust, but that they since the records did not qualify as law enforcement records, the agency could not use Exemption 7(C) (invasion of privacy concerning law enforcement records). Mehta also found that the agency had not shown that it had conducted a sufficient segregability analysis of the IG's records. Goldstein's suit against the IRS had included a request for records concerning Capes' interactions with the IRS, but the present suit stemmed from a request by Goldstein's current attorney, Scott Tufts, for records concerning the TIGTA's investigation regarding two IRS employees who met with Capes. The agency initially issued a Glomar response neither confirming nor denying the existence of records, but subsequently withdrew its Glomar response after determining that a TIGTA agent had told Tufts of the existence of the investigation. The agency, however, claimed that all 457 pages were exempt under Exemptions 6 and 7(C). Mehta rejected the agency's Exemption 7(C) claim, noting that "TIGTA has not offered any concrete evidence that would allow the court to conclude that the investigation and the responsive material it generated pertained to its law enforcement function, as opposed to its functions of investigating 'administrative misconduct.'" Having concluded that Exemption 7(C) was inapplicable, Mehta decided that Exemption 6 nevertheless protected the records. He dismissed Goldstein's claim that his whistleblower status enhanced his ability to obtain the records. He noted that "to the extent that Plaintiff argues that his mere status as a whistleblower entitles him to the responsive records, irrespective of the Exemption 6 balancing, Plaintiff has cited no legal authority for that proposition." Mehta found that Goldstein had not shown a public interest that would outweigh the individuals' privacy interest. He pointed out that "to be certain, the inconsistencies that Plaintiff discovered raise legitimate questions about the extent of Capes' interactions with the IRS and seemingly led TIGTA to conduct an investigation. But those facts alone would not cause a reasonable person to have more than a suspicion of impropriety by the government." Mehta indicated that the agency's segregability analysis was insufficient. He observed that "it largely parrots the elements of Exemption 6 and states without 'detailed justification,' but rather in 'conclusory' fashion, that no responsive documents are segregable. That may be so, but the court needs more information before it is satisfied that the agency has carried out its duty." Goldstein argued that he was entitled to access under the Privacy Act because the records pertained to his role as a whistleblower. Mehta pointed out that "it may be true that TIGTA's investigation of those employees arose out of Capes' contacts with the IRS and therefore the responsive documents likely in some way reference Plaintiff's counsel and his activities. But, even if Plaintiff's counsel's actions could be imputed to him, that fact alone does not make those records 'about' Plaintiff or prove that they 'pertain' to him."
Issues: Litigation - Segregability analysis, Exemption 7 - Law enforcement records, Exemption 6 - Invasion of privacy

FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Amit Mehta has resolved two separate, but related suits brought by Richard Goldstein against the IRS and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration pertaining to the Samuel Goldstein Estate, for which he and his sister were the primary beneficiaries. Goldstein discovered that his sister, Carol Jones, and David Capes, one of their attorneys, planned to improperly evade paying taxes on much of the estate. He reported the allegations to TIGTA, which conducted an investigation of two IRS employees. As a result, Goldstein filed requests with both the IRS and TIGTA for records. In his prior ruling in the cases, Mehta found that neither agency had properly responded to Goldstein's requests and sent the case back to the agencies for further proceedings. This time, however, Mehta found the agencies had responded satisfactorily, except to the extent that the IRS had continued to resist Goldstein's right to have access to the estate's records. The IRS took the position that Goldstein was not entitled to access to the estate's records unless he could show a material interest. After reviewing the language of § 6103(e), which allows broader disclosure to estate and trust tax returns if beneficiaries can show they have a material interest in accessing the records, Mehta found Goldstein was not entitled to access to the Estate's tax records before his father's death. He noted that "Plaintiff has not established a material interest in the Estate's tax records that reach back to years before his father's death. . . Plaintiff bears the burden of proving that he has a material interest in the requested records; merely questioning the sufficiency of the IRS' explanations for denying him access will not do." Mehta then noted that although he had found in his first ruling that Goldstein was a beneficiary of the Living Trust, he had remanded the issue to IRS to determine if Goldstein had the requisite material interest to qualify for access. He observed that the IRS "treated as advisory the court's finding that Plaintiff qualified as a beneficiary of the Living Trust" and "instead determined Plaintiff had failed to establish his legal relationship with the Living Trust based on" an amendment to the Trust. Mehta indicated this conclusion was incorrect. He pointed out that "both the Uniform Trust Code, as well as the Restatement of Trusts, take a broad view of who qualifies as a beneficiary, thus undermining Defendant's narrow interpretation. In short, under Missouri law, Plaintiff was a beneficiary of his father's Living Trust, and Defendant's conclusion to the contrary was incorrect." He ordered the agency to reprocess Goldstein's request based on his ruling. Mehta then found Goldstein did not have a material interest in records pertaining to the SRG Investment Limited Partnership, an entity established to hold and manage Goldstein's family's assets. Mehta rejected Goldstein's Privacy Act claim, noting that "although Plaintiff's whistleblowing activity may have generated records responsive to Item 8, those records decidedly do not 'pertain' to Plaintiff. If those records exist, they are 'about' the taxpayers who Plaintiff alleged violated the law, namely, his sister and others whom he claims conspired to evade tax obligations." In his suit against TIGTA, Goldstein argued that its search was not adequate because it had not consulted with the IRS. Mehta explained that Goldstein seemed to be turning FOIA's consultation requirement on its head. He pointed out that "understood correctly, the section permits an agency to extend the time to respond in the event the agency determines that another agency maintains a substantial interest in the responsive records, such that interagency consultation is appropriate prior to making any decision concerning whether to produce those records. It does not compel such interagency consultation in the first place."
Issues: Search - Consultation, Adequacy - Search

FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Amit Mehta has declined to reconsider two rulings he made in FOIA cases brought by Richard Goldstein against the IRS and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration concerning whistleblower allegations Goldstein made against the mismanagement of his father's estate and whether Goldstein had a material interest in the records of the estate that would allow him access to tax return information that would normally be confidential under Section 6103. In his motion asking Mehta to reconsider his case against the IRS, Goldstein argued that Publication 5251 explaining the whistleblower claim process supported his request for reconsideration. Mehta disagreed, pointing out that "if anything, [Publication 5251] confirms the breadth of Section 6103 and the limited information available to a whistleblower. . . In light of this broad restriction on disclosure, it is mystifying why Plaintiff would think that Publication 5251 demonstrates clear error [on the part of the court]. This court held that unless perfected, Plaintiff is not entitled to information regarding the whistleblower investigation, including the dates, times, and locations of meetings, because it qualifies as protected 'return information' under Section 6103. Publication 5251 does not compel a different result." Goldstein also argued that in Crestek v. IRS, a pending suit against the agency, the IRS had changed its position on the applicability of Exemption 6. Mehta was puzzled by the claim, noting that "Plaintiff argues that the IRS's alleged inconsistent position in Crestek bears on the public interest in the whistleblower records at issue in this case. But Section 6103 operates through FOIA Exemption 3 and Exemption 3 requires no public-private balancing. Crestek is thus irrelevant to this case." The IRS also asked Mehta to clarify his ruling in his previous decision in the Goldstein litigation finding that Goldstein had a material interest in certain records and ordering the agency to assess whether it had such records. Explaining the implications of his decision, Mehta observed that "Plaintiff is entitled to records responsive to Item 8 if he can demonstrate a 'material interest' in those records per the IRS Code and attendant regulations. The court understands Plaintiff to have perfected his request as to the records of certain taxpayers, such as the Samuel R. Goldstein Estate, and the Samuel R. Goldstein Living Trust. On the other hand, Plaintiff has not demonstrated a material interest as to certain other taxpayer records, such as those of the SRG Investment Limited Partnership. Only the IRS knows, however, whether the investigative records responsive to Item 8 relate to a taxpayer as to whom Plaintiff has demonstrated a material interest. The agency, therefore, should determine whether any Item 8 records concern a taxpayer as to whom Plaintiff has made a perfected request. If they do, such records should be released to Plaintiff unless their disclosure would reveal an examination or other inquiry of a taxpayer as to whom Plaintiff does not have a perfected interest." Mehta found even less reason to reconsider his decision in Goldstein's suit against the Inspector General for Tax Administration. Goldstein pointed to the IRS changes in Crestek, but Mehta observed that "the decision of the IRS â€" which is not a party in this case â€" to withdraw its assertion of Exemption 6 in another case about unrelated records does not constitute an intervening change in controlling law or the kind of new, material evidence that merits altering the court's decision."
Issues: Litigation - Jurisdiction - Failure to State a Claim

Date Filed	Doc #	Docket Text
2014-12-23	1	COMPLAINT against TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-3945071) filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5 Part A, # 6 Exhibit 5 Part B, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Civil Cover Sheet, # 9 Summons)(Katzen, Adam) (Entered: 12/23/2014)
2014-12-23	2	MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- T. Scott Tufts, :Firm- Tufts Law Firm, PLLC, :Address- 111 South Maitland Avenue, Suite 101, Maitland, FL 32751. Phone No. - 407-647-8886. Fax No. - 407-641-8082 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-3945091. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Katzen, Adam) (Entered: 12/23/2014)
2014-12-23		Case Assigned to Judge Gladys Kessler. (sth, ) (Entered: 12/29/2014)
2014-12-29	3	SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Summons)(sth, ) (Entered: 12/29/2014)
2014-12-30	4	NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. Case related to Case No. 1:14-cv-02186-GK. (Katzen, Adam) (Entered: 12/30/2014)
2015-01-05		Case randomly reassigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. Judge Gladys Kessler no longer assigned to the case. (ztnr, ) (Entered: 01/05/2015)
2015-01-21	5	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 1/12/2015. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/11/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration US Attorney District of Columbia)(Katzen, Adam) (Entered: 01/21/2015)
2015-01-21	6	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 1/12/15. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration US Attorney General)(Katzen, Adam) (Entered: 01/21/2015)
2015-01-21	7	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION served on 1/9/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration TIGTA)(Katzen, Adam) (Entered: 01/21/2015)
2015-02-06		MINUTE ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Thomas Scott Tufts is hereby admitted pro hac vice to appear in this matter on behalf of Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 02/06/2015. (lcapm2) (Entered: 02/06/2015)
2015-02-11	8	ANSWER to Complaint by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION.(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 02/11/2015)
2015-02-17	9	ORDER. Both a complaint and an answer are now before the Court in this FOIA case. It is hereby ordered that the parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before February 27, 2015. Please see the attached Order for additional details. Signed by Amit P. Mehta on 02/17/2015. (lcapm2) (Entered: 02/17/2015)
2015-02-17		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Joint Status Report due by 2/27/2015. (cdw) (Entered: 02/18/2015)
2015-02-20	10	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why this matter should not be consolidated with related matter 1:14-cv-02186-APM. The parties shall show cause in writing, either separately or jointly, on or before March 6, 2015. Please see the attached Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 02/20/2015. (lcapm2) (Entered: 02/20/2015)
2015-02-20		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Parties response to Show Cause Order due by 3/6/2015. (cdw) (Entered: 02/23/2015)
2015-02-27	11	STATUS REPORT JOINT by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 02/27/2015)
2015-03-04	12	AMENDED COMPLAINT against TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 03/04/2015)
2015-03-05	13	MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Show Cause Order by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 03/05/2015)
2015-03-06		MINUTE ORDER granting 13 Defendant Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to 10 Order to Show Cause. Defendant Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration shall show cause in writing on or before March 12, 2015. The court reminds Defendant that Local Rule 7(m) requires counsel to confer with opposing counsel before filing any nondispositive motion in a civil action, and further requires a party to include in its nondispositive motion a statement that the required discussion occurred, and a statement as to whether the motion is opposed. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 03/06/2015. (lcapm2) (Entered: 03/06/2015)
2015-03-06	14	RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN re 10 Order, Plaintiff's Position Regarding Consolidation . (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 03/06/2015)
2015-03-12	15	RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION . (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 03/12/2015)
2015-03-17		After considering 14 15 the parties' submissions to the court in response to 10 Order to Show Cause, the court will not consolidate this case with Case 1:14-cv-02186-APM. The parties are directed to continue to file all documents in Case 1:14-cv-02189-APM on this docket. Singed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 03/17/2015. (lcapm2) (Entered: 03/17/2015)
2015-03-18	16	Amended ANSWER to 12 Amended Complaint, by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. Related document: 12 Amended Complaint, filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN.(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 03/18/2015)
2015-03-26	17	ORDER setting the following schedule for further proceedings: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is due on or before May 1, 2015; Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, and any Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, is due on or before May 15, 2015; Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, if any, is due on or before May 29, 2015; Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, if any, is due on or before June 5, 2015. Plaintiff's requests for discovery and a Vaughn Index are denied without prejudice. Please see the attached Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 03/26/2015. (lcapm2) (Entered: 03/26/2015)
2015-03-26		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Defendant's Summary Judgment motion due by 5/1/2015. Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 5/15/2015. Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 5/29/2015. Plaintiff's Cross Motion due by 5/15/2015. Response to Cross Motion due by 5/29/2015. Reply to Cross Motion due by 6/5/2015. (cdw) (Entered: 03/30/2015)
2015-05-01	18	MOTION for Leave to File \ Submit Documents In Camera by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 05/01/2015)
2015-05-01	19	MOTION for Summary Judgment by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, # 3 Declaration of Darlene R. Fulton, # 4 Fulton Exhibit A, # 5 Fulton Exhibit B, # 6 Fulton Exhibit C, # 7 Fulton Exhibit D, # 8 Declaration of Elissa Sissman, # 9 Sissman Exhibit A, # 10 Sissman Exhibit B, # 11 Sissman Exhibit C, # 12 Sissman Exhibit D, # 13 Text of Proposed Order)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 05/01/2015)
2015-05-06		MINUTE ORDER: The court directs Defendant to file via ECF on or before May 8, 2015, a notice clarifying whether it seeks in camera and ex parte treatment of the two documents discussed in its 18 Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera, or solely in camera treatment. It is unclear to the court whether Defendant seeks to file the two documents under seal only or seeks to provide them to the court ex parte, as well. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 05/06/2015. (lcapm2) (Entered: 05/06/2015)
2015-05-06		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Defendant's clarifying notice due by 5/8/2015. (cdw) (Entered: 05/06/2015)
2015-05-08	20	NOTICE by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION re Order, (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 05/08/2015)
2015-05-12	21	Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct 17 Order by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 05/12/2015)
2015-05-12		MINUTE ORDER granting 21 Consent Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and any Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, is due on or before June 15, 2015; Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, if any, is due on or before June 29, 2015; Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, if any, is due on or before July 3, 2015. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 05/12/2015. (Entered: 05/12/2015)
2015-05-12		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment due by 6/15/2015. Reply to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment due by 6/29/2015. Plaintiff's Cross Motion due by 6/15/2015. Response to Cross Motion due by 6/29/2015. Reply to Cross Motion due by 7/3/2015. (cdw) (Entered: 05/14/2015)
2015-05-27		MINUTE ORDER denying 18 Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera. In its 20 Notice to the court, Defendant clarified that it "seeks both in camera review and ex parte treatment of the two documents discussed in its Motion for Leave to Submit Documents in Camera." Defendant has not, however, offered any justification for why the declaration and accompanying brief should receive ex parte treatment. The principal case on which it relies in 18 its Motion and the factors listed therein pertain to sealing all or part of a case's record, see Johnson v. Greater Southeast Cmty. Hosp. Corp., 951 F.2d 1268, 1277, n. 14 (D.C. Cir. 1991), not to ex parte review. Should Defendant have reason to submit the declaration and accompanying brief under seal, it may move to do so. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 05/27/2015. (lcapm2) (Entered: 05/27/2015)
2015-06-10	22	Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct 17 Order,,, by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 06/10/2015)
2015-06-10		MINUTE ORDER granting 22 Consent Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and any Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, is due on or before June 22, 2015; Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, if any, is due on or before July 6, 2015; Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, if any, is due on or before July 10, 2015. No further extensions shall be granted absent a showing of good cause. Good cause shall not include the press of other business. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 06/10/2015. (lcapm2) (Entered: 06/10/2015)
2015-06-22	23	Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Proposed Order by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 06/22/2015)
2015-06-22	24	MOTION for Vaughn Index and Proposed Order by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Sissman, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 06/22/2015)
2015-06-22	25	NOTICE of Filing of Declaration of T. Scott Tufts, In Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Plaintiff's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN re 23 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Proposed Order (Attachments: # 1 Declaration T. Scott Tufts, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20, # 22 Exhibit 21, # 23 Exhibit 22, # 24 Exhibit 23, # 25 Exhibit 24, # 26 Exhibit 25, # 27 Exhibit 26, # 28 Exhibit 27, # 29 Exhibit 28)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 06/22/2015)
2015-06-22	26	Memorandum in opposition to Defendant's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment and In Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for summary Judgment filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Attachments: # 1 Opposition to Material Facts, # 2 Statement of Facts)(Tufts, T.) Modified on 6/23/2015 (zrdj). (Entered: 06/23/2015)
2015-06-23	27	Memorandum in opposition to re 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Proposed Order filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Attachments: # 1 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, # 2 Statement of Facts)(Tufts, T.) Modified on 6/24/2015 (zrdj). (Entered: 06/23/2015)
2015-07-06	28	MOTION for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 07/06/2015)
2015-07-06	29	RESPONSE re 24 MOTION for Vaughn Index and Proposed Order filed by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 07/06/2015)
2015-07-06	30	Memorandum in opposition re 23 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Proposed Order filed by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: # 1 Response to Statement of Undisputed Material Facts)(Bondada, Kavitha) Modified event title on 7/7/2015 (znmw). (Entered: 07/06/2015)
2015-07-06	31	REPLY to opposition to motion re 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (See Docket Entry 30 to view document). (znmw) (Entered: 07/07/2015)
2015-07-10	32	REPLY to opposiiton re 23 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Tufts, T.) . Modified on 7/13/2015 to correct event/linkage (jf). (Entered: 07/10/2015)
2015-07-11	33	REPLY to opposition to motion re 24 MOTION for Vaughn Index and Proposed Order filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 07/11/2015)
2016-03-03		MINUTE ORDER granting 28 Defendant's Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte. Defendant shall provide these documents to the court on or before March 14, 2016. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 03/03/2016. (lcapm3) (Entered: 03/03/2016)
2016-03-03		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Defendant's In Camera and Ex Parte documents due by 3/14/2016. (zcdw) (Entered: 03/07/2016)
2016-03-14	34	NOTICE of Compliance by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 03/14/2016)
2016-03-25	35	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 19 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, 23 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and 24 Plaintiff's Motion for Vaughn Index. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 03/25/2016. (lcapm3) (Entered: 03/25/2016)
2016-03-25		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: TIGTA's Status Report due by 4/25/2016. (cdw) (Entered: 03/25/2016)
2016-04-21	36	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 04/21/2016)
2016-04-25		MINUTE ORDER granting 36 Consent Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's Status Report is now due on May 25, 2016. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 04/25/2016. (lcapm3) (Entered: 04/25/2016)
2016-04-26		Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant's Status Report due by 5/25/2016. (zmm) (Entered: 04/26/2016)
2016-05-25	37	STATUS REPORT by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 05/25/2016)
2016-06-10	38	MOTION for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 06/10/2016)
2016-06-10	39	Second MOTION for Summary Judgment by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Timothy P. Camus, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 06/10/2016)
2016-06-22	40	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 39 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment , 38 MOTION for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 06/22/2016)
2016-06-23		MINUTE ORDER granting 40 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to TIGTA's Second Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte. Plaintiff's Response shall be due on or before July 18, 2016. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 06/23/2016. (lcapm3) (Entered: 06/23/2016)
2016-06-23		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Plaintiff's response due by 7/18/2016. (cdw) (Entered: 06/23/2016)
2016-07-11	41	Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 39 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment , 38 MOTION for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 07/11/2016)
2016-07-12		MINUTE ORDER granting 41 Motion for Additional Extension of Time to Respond to TIGTA's Second Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte. Plaintiff's Response to TIGTA's Second Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte shall be due on or before July 25, 2016. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 07/12/2016. (lcapm3) (Entered: 07/12/2016)
2016-07-12		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Responses to TIGTA's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte due by 7/25/2016. (cdw) (Entered: 07/13/2016)
2016-07-25	42	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Second Motion for Summary Judgment by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Declaration, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A Part 1, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit A Part 2, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit E, # 8 Exhibit F, # 9 Exhibit G, # 10 Exhibit H, # 11 Exhibit I, # 12 Exhibit J, # 13 Exhibit K)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 07/25/2016)
2016-07-26		MINUTE ORDER granting, nunc pro tunc to July 25, 2016, 42 Consent Motion for Third Extension of Time to File Response and Opposition to TIGTA's Second Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte. Plaintiff's Response to TIGTA's Second Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte shall be due on or before August 25, 2016. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 07/26/2016. (lcapm3) Modified on 7/27/2016 (cdw). (Entered: 07/26/2016)
2016-08-24	43	Consent MOTION to Stay by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 08/24/2016)
2016-08-25		MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Consent Motion for Stay of all Proceedings. This matter is stayed for 60 days until October 24, 2016, rather than the 90 days requested by the parties. The parties shall submit a Status Report on or before October 24, 2016, updating the court on the status of settlement negotiations. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 08/25/2016. (lcapm3) (Entered: 08/25/2016)
2016-08-25		Case Stayed. Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Status Report due by 10/24/2016. (cdw) (Entered: 09/02/2016)
2016-10-24	44	Joint STATUS REPORT by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 10/24/2016)
2016-10-26		MINUTE ORDER setting a status hearing for November 3, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 10. In the event counsel or a party is unable to appear on the scheduled date and time due to an unresolvable scheduling conflict, counsel shall meet and confer and provide, via email, two alternative dates and times to the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Ms. Chashawn White (Chashawn_White@dcd.uscourts.gov), who shall reset the status hearing and provide notice to the parties. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 10/26/2016. (lcapm3) (Entered: 10/26/2016)
2016-10-26		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Status Conference set for 11/3/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 before Judge Amit P. Mehta. (cdw) (Entered: 10/26/2016)
2016-11-03		Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Amit P. Mehta: Status Conference held on 11/3/2016. (Court Reporter: William Zaremba) (cdw) (Entered: 11/03/2016)
2016-11-03		MINUTE ORDER: In light of the Status Conference held on November 3, 2016, the parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before November 16, 2016, informing the court of the remaining issues in this matter and how the parties wish to proceed. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/03/2016. (lcapm1) (Entered: 11/03/2016)
2016-11-03		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Joint Status Report due by 11/16/2016. (cdw) (Entered: 11/04/2016)
2016-11-16	45	STATUS REPORT by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 11/16/2016)
2016-11-16	46	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 11/16/2016)
2016-11-17	47	Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 11/17/2016)
2016-11-18		MINUTE ORDER granting Plaintiff's 47 Amended Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report. Plaintiff's 46 Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report is denied as moot. The parties shall submit a Joint Status Report on or before November 23, 2016. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/18/2016. (lcapm3) (Entered: 11/18/2016)
2016-11-18		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Joint Status Report due by 11/23/2016. (cdw) (Entered: 11/21/2016)
2016-11-22	48	Joint STATUS REPORT by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 11/22/2016)
2016-11-28		MINUTE ORDER: In light of 48 the parties' Joint Status Report, the parties shall submit a subsequent Joint Status Report on or before December 19, 2016, advising the court of progress in this matter. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/28/2016. (lcapm3) (Entered: 11/28/2016)
2016-11-28		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Joint Status Report due by 12/19/2016. (cdw) (Entered: 11/29/2016)
2016-12-19	49	Joint STATUS REPORT by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 12/19/2016)
2016-12-20	50	VACATED PURSUANT TO COURT'S ORDER OF 2/22/2017............ORDER: Having considered the parties' 49 Joint Status Report, the court sets the following schedule for further proceedings in this matter: Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment, its Cross-Motion, and its Response to Defendant's Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera shall be filed on or before February 2, 2017; Defendant's Reply and Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion shall be filed on or before February 23, 2017; and Plaintiff's Reply shall be filed on or before March 2, 2017. See attached Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 12/20/2016. (lcapm3) Modified on 2/23/2017 (zcdw). (Entered: 12/20/2016)
2016-12-20		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Responses due by 2/2/2017 Plaintiff's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 2/2/2017. Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 2/23/2017. Plaintiff's Cross Motion due by 2/2/2017. Response to Cross Motion due by 2/23/2017. Reply to Cross Motion due by 3/2/2017. (cdw) (Entered: 12/21/2016)
2017-01-29	51	NOTICE of Change of Address by T. Scott Tufts (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 01/29/2017)
2017-02-02	52	WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO MINUTE ORDER FILED 4/19/2017.....NOTICE of Filing of New Declaration of T. Scott Tufts, Esq. in Opposition of Motion for Summary Judgment by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 5A, # 7 Exhibit 5B, # 8 Exhibit 5C, # 9 Exhibit 5D, # 10 Exhibit 5E, # 11 Exhibit 5F, # 12 Exhibit 5G, # 13 Exhibit 5H, # 14 Exhibit 5I, # 15 Exhibit 5J, # 16 Exhibit 5K, # 17 Exhibit 5L, # 18 Exhibit 5M, # 19 Exhibit 5N, # 20 Exhibit 5O, # 21 Exhibit 5P, # 22 Exhibit 5Q, # 23 Exhibit 5R, # 24 Exhibit 5S, # 25 Exhibit 5T, # 26 Exhibit 5U, # 27 Exhibit 5V, # 28 Exhibit 5W, # 29 Exhibit 5X, # 30 Exhibit 5Y, # 31 Exhibit 5Z, # 32 Exhibit 6)(Tufts, T.) Modified on 4/19/2017 (zrdj). (Entered: 02/02/2017)
2017-02-02	53	MOTION for Relief from Judgment under Rule 60(b) by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 02/02/2017)
2017-02-02	54	RESPONSE re 38 MOTION for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 02/02/2017)
2017-02-02	55	Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 02/02/2017)
2017-02-02	56	RESPONSE re 39 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment and Statement of Undisputed Facts filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 02/02/2017)
2017-02-02	57	NOTICE of Statement of Undisputed Facts by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN re 55 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 02/02/2017)
2017-02-16	58	MOTION to Clarify Response Deadline or in the Alternative, Motion to Modify Scheduling Order by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 02/16/2017)
2017-02-16		MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of 58 Defendant's Motion for Clarification, it is hereby ordered that Defendant's Response to 53 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment is due on or before February 23, 2017. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 02/16/2017. (lcapm3) (Entered: 02/16/2017)
2017-02-16		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Response to 53 due by 2/23/2017. (cdw) (Entered: 02/17/2017)
2017-02-22	59	Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines in Scheduling Order) by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 02/22/2017)
2017-02-22		MINUTE ORDER granting 59 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines in Scheduling Order. Defendant's Reply, Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment shall be due on or before February 28, 2017. Plaintiff's Reply shall be due on or before March 7, 2017. The court's December 20, 2016, Scheduling Order and February 16, 2017, Minute Order are hereby vacated. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 02/22/2017. (lcapm3) (Entered: 02/22/2017)
2017-02-22		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Defendant's reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 2/28/2017. Response to Cross Motion due by 2/28/2017. Reply to Cross Motion due by 3/7/2017. Response to Motion for Relief from Judgment due by 2/28/2017. (cdw) (Entered: 02/23/2017)
2017-02-28	60	RESPONSE re 53 MOTION for Relief from Judgment under Rule 60(b) filed by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Timothy P. Camus)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 02/28/2017)
2017-02-28	61	MOTION for Leave to Submit Statement of Undisputed Material Facts by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 02/28/2017)
2017-02-28	62	RESPONSE re 55 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Reply to Response, Doc. No. 56 filed by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 02/28/2017)
2017-02-28	63	ENTERED IN ERROR.....MOTION TIGTA'S Opposition to Plaintiff's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts re 57 Notice (Other), 56 Response to motion by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Bondada, Kavitha) Modified on 3/1/2017 (jf). (Entered: 02/28/2017)
2017-03-01		NOTICE OF ERROR re 63 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief; emailed to kavitha.bondada@usdoj.gov, cc'd 6 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Incorrect event used, 2. Please refile document (jf, ) (Entered: 03/01/2017)
2017-03-01	64	RESPONSE re 57 Notice (Other), 56 Response to motion Opposition to Plaintiff's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts filed by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION. (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 03/01/2017)
2017-03-02	65	RESPONSE re 61 MOTION for Leave to Submit Statement of Undisputed Material Facts filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 03/02/2017)
2017-03-06	66	REPLY to opposition to motion re 55 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 03/06/2017)
2017-03-06	67	REPLY to opposition to motion re 53 MOTION for Relief from Judgment under Rule 60(b) filed by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN. (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 03/06/2017)
2017-03-06	68	MOTION Clarification of Response Deadline re 61 MOTION for Leave to Submit Statement of Undisputed Material Facts by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 03/06/2017)
2017-04-13	69	MOTION to Withdraw 52 Notice (Other),,, and Replace with Redacted Document by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A Part 1, # 3 Exhibit A Part 2, # 4 Exhibit A Part 3, # 5 Exhibit A Part 4, # 6 Exhibit A Part 5, # 7 Exhibit A Part 6, # 8 Exhibit A Part 7, # 9 Exhibit A Part 8, # 10 Exhibit A Part 9, # 11 Exhibit A Part 10, # 12 Exhibit A Part 11, # 13 Exhibit A Part 12, # 14 Exhibit A Part 13, # 15 Exhibit A Part 14, # 16 Exhibit A Part 15, # 17 Exhibit A Part 16, # 18 Exhibit A Part 17, # 19 Exhibit A Part 18, # 20 Exhibit A Part 19, # 21 Exhibit A Part 20, # 22 Exhibit A Part 21, # 23 Exhibit A Part 22, # 24 Exhibit A Part 23, # 25 Exhibit A Part 24, # 26 Exhibit A Part 25, # 27 Exhibit A Part 26, # 28 Exhibit A Part 27, # 29 Exhibit A Part 28, # 30 Exhibit A Part 29, # 31 Exhibit A Part 30, # 32 Exhibit A Part 31, # 33 Exhibit A Part 32, # 34 Exhibit A Part 33)(Tufts, T.) (Entered: 04/13/2017)
2017-04-14	70	NOTICE by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN re 69 MOTION to Withdraw 52 Notice (Other),,, and Replace with Redacted Document (Tufts, T.) (Entered: 04/14/2017)
2017-04-19		MINUTE ORDER granting 69 Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw 52 and Replace with Redacted Document. The attachments to Plaintiff's Motion, ECF No. 69, shall replace the documents in ECF No. 52. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 04/19/2017. (lcapm3) (Entered: 04/19/2017)
2017-04-19	71	NOTICE of redacted New Declaration of T. Scott Tufts by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN (See docket entry 69 exhibits to view documents) (zrdj) (Entered: 04/19/2017)
2017-07-22	72	MOTION (Request) to Take Judicial Notice REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by RICHARD GOLDSTEIN re 53 MOTION for Relief from Judgment under Rule 60(b) , 55 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit TIGTA Report of 7-13-17)(Tufts, T.) Modified event title on 7/24/2017 (znmw). (Entered: 07/22/2017)
2017-09-07		MINUTE ORDER granting 38 Defendant's Motion for Leave to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte. Defendant shall provide these documents to the court on or before September 12, 2017. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 09/07/2017. (lcapm2) (Entered: 09/07/2017)
2017-09-12	73	MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit Documents In Camera and Ex Parte by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 09/12/2017)
2017-09-12		MINUTE ORDER granting 73 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall provide its in camera and ex parte submission to the court no later than September 13, 2017. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 09/12/2017. (lcapm2) (Entered: 09/12/2017)
2017-09-12		Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Defendant's In-Camera Submission due by 9/13/2017. (zcdw) (Entered: 09/13/2017)
2017-09-13	74	NOTICE of Compliance by TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (Bondada, Kavitha) (Entered: 09/13/2017)
2017-09-29	75	MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 39 Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment, 55 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and 53 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment Under Rule 60(b). See the attached Memorandum Opinion for further details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta 09/29/2017. (lcapm2) (Entered: 09/29/2017)
2017-09-29	76	ORDER granting 39 Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment, and denying 55 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and 53 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment Under Rule 60(b). Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 09/29/2017. (lcapm2) (Entered: 09/29/2017)
2017-09-29		MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 61 Defendant's Motion for Leave to Submit Statement of Facts, 68 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification of Response Deadline, and 72 Plaintiff's Motion to Take Judicial Notice. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 09/29/2017. (lcapm2) (Entered: 09/29/2017)
2017-09-29	77	SEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 9/29/2017. (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.) (zcdw) (Entered: 09/29/2017)
Hide Docket Events