| Date Filed | Doc # | Docket Text |
|
| 2015-03-10 | | LODGED MOTION TO COMPEL sought to be filed by Petitioner Osvaldo Rosa. (rn) (Entered: 03/12/2015) |
| 2015-03-10 | 1 | NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH LODGING OF COMPLAINT mailed to Petitioner Osvaldo Rosa. Upon submission of your complaint it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the CV 60p form attached. If you do not respond within 30 days of the date of this letter your action will be dismissed. Re Lodged Motion (Attachments: # 1 Lodged Motion, # 2 CV 60p) (rn) (Entered: 03/12/2015) |
| 2015-05-11 | 2 | VACATED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED 6/22/15, DOCUMENT 4 . ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Chief District Judge George H. King: This case is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. (Please see attached document for details.) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (dgon) Modified on 6/23/2015 (bm). (Entered: 05/12/2015) |
| 2015-06-09 | 3 | REQUEST for Reconsideration of Order of Dismissal filed by petitioner Osvaldo Rosa. (bm) (Entered: 06/23/2015) |
| 2015-06-22 | 4 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) re: Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal by Judge George H. King granting 3 MOTION for Reconsideration: In his Motion, Petitioner represents that he never received the March 10, 2015 Clerk's notice and asks the Court to set aside the dismissal of his action and allow him the opportunity to ameliorate the deficiency identified in the Clerk's notice. (See Mot.) We conclude that Petitioner has shown good cause for his failure to respond to the Clerk's notice. We hereby grant the Motion and vacate our May 11, 2015 Order of Dismissal. Petitioner shall either submit the required filing fee or an IFP application no later than July 31, 2015. We warn Petitioner that if he does not respond by July 31, 2015, we are inclined to dismiss this action. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 06/23/2015) |
| 2015-08-06 | 5 | [MOTION TO COMPEL] COMPLAINT against Respondent United States of America. Case assigned to Judge Dean D. Pregerson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm., filed by Petitioner Osvaldo Rosa. (et) (Entered: 08/06/2015) |
| 2015-08-06 | 6 | MOTION AND DECLARATION Under Penalty of Perjury in Support of Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Osvaldo Rosa. (et) (Entered: 08/06/2015) |
| 2015-08-06 | 7 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (et) (Entered: 08/06/2015) |
| 2015-08-06 | 8 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) (Entered: 08/06/2015) |
| 2015-08-07 | 9 | ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: granting 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $6 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (jm) (Entered: 08/10/2015) |
| 2015-09-23 | 10 | NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURT'S NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM; NOTICE OF REQUEST TO SETTTLE; OFFER OF OF SETTLEMENT; filed by petitioner Osvaldo Rosa. (LATE DOCKETING DUE TO CLERK'S OFFICE ERROR). (lc) (Entered: 04/11/2016) |
| 2016-04-14 | 11 | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: STATUS UPDATE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Pursuant to Plaintiffs most recent filing, Notice of Compliance with Courts Notice to Parties of Court Directed ADR Program, Notice of Request to Settle, and Offer of Settlement (Dkt. No. 10), the Court hereby orders the Government to providethe Court with an update on the status of this case. The Government is required to file a written status report within fourteen days from the date of this Order. (lc) (Entered: 04/15/2016) |
| 2016-06-10 | 12 | MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 55 filed by plaintiff Osvaldo Rosa. (lc) (Entered: 06/15/2016) |
| 2016-06-23 | 13 | STATUS REPORT filed by Respondent United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Axe, Jason) (Entered: 06/23/2016) |
| 2016-07-11 | 14 | NOTICE OF STATUS OF EMERGENCY LOCKDOWN OF PLAINTIFF filed by plaintiff Osvaldo Rosa. (lc) (Entered: 07/15/2016) |
| 2016-08-08 | 15 | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: On June 23, 2016, Defendants submitted a status report informing the court that the United States is not a proper party to a FOIA action. Accordingly, the court hereby orders the parties to file cross-briefs, not to exceed ten pages, whether this case should not be dismissed. Such briefs shall be filed within forty five days from the date of this Order. Plaintiffs failure to file a brief will result in the dismissal of this action. (lc). Modified on 8/8/2016 (lc). (Entered: 08/08/2016) |
| 2016-09-19 | 20 | MOTION TO JOIN PARTY OF REAL INTEREST filed by plaintiff Osvaldo Rosa. (lc) (Entered: 09/29/2016) |
| 2016-09-22 | 16 | RESPONSE filed by Respondent United States of Americato Order to Show Cause,, 15 (Attachments: # 1 POS)(Axe, Jason) (Entered: 09/22/2016) |
| 2016-09-23 | 17 | ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Action dismissed withoutprejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedures. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) (Entered: 09/23/2016) |
| 2016-09-23 | 18 | NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Order[ of dismissal 17 The order was filed in error. (lc) (Entered: 09/23/2016) |
| 2016-09-23 | 19 | MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson:THE COURT having ordered the Plaintiff to show cause in writing, not later than forty five (45) days from the date of the order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to name a valid defendant under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B), and Plaintiff having failed to respond, THE COURT ORDERS that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice. (lc) Modified on 9/29/2016 (lc). (VACATED PER ORDER OF 9/29/19 SEE DOCKET NO. 21 ) (Entered: 09/23/2016) |
| 2016-09-29 | 21 | ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO JOIN REAL PARTY OF INTEREST AND DISMISSING CASE 20 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: On September 23, one day after the deadline, the court issued an Order dismissing the action with prejudice for failure to comply with the courts August 8 Order. (Dkt. 17.) However, it now appears that Plaintiff timely submitted a response to the courts August 8 Orderbut the court did not receive the response until after the deadlinedue to a clerical error. (See Dkt. 20.) Accordingly, the court VACATES its September 23, 2016 dismissing the action. (See Dkt. 19.) Having reviewed Plaintiffs response, entitled Plaintiffs Motion to Join Party of Real Interest, the court concludes that the action must nonetheless be DISMISSED. (lc). Modified on 9/29/2016. (lc). (Entered: 09/29/2016) |
 Hide Docket Events |
