Case Detail

FOIA Project Annotation: Judge James Boasberg has ruled that the FBI did not receive prisoner William Ball's FOIA request and has dismissed Ball's suit. Ball filed suit against the U.S. Marshals Service, the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Secret Service, and the FBI after the agencies failed to respond to his request for records about his conviction. Boasberg initially dismissed Ball's claim under the Administrative Procedure Act, noting that "his only articulated cause of action relies on FOIA and the Privacy Act." Ball had conceded his claim against the Secret Service. Since the FBI was the only other agency that had filed a summary judgment motion, Boasberg indicated he would only rule as to the FBI and leave the other agencies to another time. The FBI argued that it could find no records of Ball's alleged request. Boasberg noted that "the Court will dismiss the Privacy Act claim because Plaintiff 'does not offer proof via, e.g., a certified-mail receipt of any other form of mailing that his missive reached [its] intended target.'" He found Ball had done no better under FOIA in proving that the agency had received his request. He observed that "again, as Plaintiff's offers no evidence beyond is own say-so, the Court concludes on summary judgement that his claim to have mailed the request to the FBI is defeated by the Bureau's sworn declaration that it was not received." He added that "Plaintiff is, of course, free to file the identical request and resubmit it to the FBI, which will then trigger a Bureau response."
Issues: Request - Perfected request, Request - Receipt

FOIA Project Annotation: Judge James Boasberg has ruled that the three agencies remaining in William Ball's FOIA litigation �" the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Marshals Service, and the Department of the Treasury �" have now shown that they conducted an adequate search and properly withheld records under Exemption 3 (other statutes), Exemption 7(C) (invasion of privacy concerning law enforcement records), and Exemption 7(E) (investigative methods or techniques). Ball, who is serving a federal sentence in Florida, requested records related to his conviction. The three agencies were the only ones remaining in Ball's suit. Boasberg noted that Ball had failed to file an opposition but indicated that under Winston & Strawn v. McLean, 843 F.3d 503 (D.C. Cir. 2016), he was required to assess independently the government's case even without the plaintiff's participation. Here, he found that agencies had shown that their searches were adequate and that their exemption claims were appropriate. Boasberg noted that the Federal Victim and Witness Protection Act qualified as an Exemption 3 statute. He explained that "the statute prohibits the Government from disclosing documents in connection with a criminal proceeding that reveal 'the name or any other information concerning a child,' as well as information in those documents, 'that concerns a child.' Here DHS 'withheld names and other information about child victims and witnesses.' Its explanation of why this was appropriate in regard to child-pornography materials strikes the Court as appropriate and is not challenged."
Issues: Adequacy - Search

FOIA Project Annotation: Judge James Boasberg has ruled that the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the Department of Treasury have now shown that they conducted adequate searches and otherwise properly responded to prisoner William Ball's FOIA request to multiple agencies for records concerning his conviction on child pornography charges. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement located 47 pages, which it provided with redactions. The Marshals Service released 21 pages with redactions, while Treasury told Ball it found no responsive records. Ball argued that USMS's search was inadequate because it failed to search two databases he believed were relevant to the request. However, Boasberg indicated that "USMS maintains that there was no reason to search the [Prisoner Operations Division] database because Ball's request did not cover medical records, and he did not receive medical care in USMS custody. Even if USMS had those records, moreover, the agency notes that they would have turned up in [the Justice Detainee Information System, the database USMS did search]; in fact, the released documents indicate no medical treatment besides a recurring prescription. The court agrees and thus upholds USMS's search." ICE had claimed the Federal Victim and Witness Protection Act, which prohibits the disclosure of information concerning the identity of a child, to withhold records under Exemption 3 (other statutes). Boasberg approved the withholding, noting that "ICE thus has complied with its statutory obligation to withhold names and identifying information about child victims." Turning to whether ICE had met the foreseeable harm standard, Boasberg observed that "given the foreseeable-harm requirement's recent vintage, precedents applying the required analysis to the exemptions at issue are relatively sparse." However, approving the foreseeable harm claims here, Boasberg indicated that "here, the agencies' statements in their declarations and the Vaughn Indexes have established foreseeable harm by 'connecting the harms in a meaningful way to the information withheld.' The agencies explain that releasing the personal identifying information of Government employees might subject them to harassment or public hostility."
Issues: Adequacy - Search, Exemption 3 - Statutory prohibition of disclosure

Date Filed	Doc #	Docket Text
2019-04-26		Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 04/26/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) (Entered: 04/29/2019)
2019-04-26	1	COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE filed by WILLIAM B. BALL. (Attachment: # 1 Summons)(zsb) (Entered: 04/29/2019)
2019-04-26	2	MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WILLIAM B. BALL (zsb) (Entered: 04/29/2019)
2019-05-08	3	PRO SE ORDER directing within 30 days of this Order, unless an extension of time is granted, plaintiff to provide a six month trust fund prisoner account statement and failure to comply will result in dismissal of case. Plaintiff shall provide the requested information specific within this order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 5/7/2019. (zrdj) (Entered: 05/09/2019)
2019-05-20	4	PARTIAL PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by WILLIAM B. BALL (zrdj) (Entered: 05/22/2019)
2019-06-10	5	ORDER directing an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $273.90 from Prison Account of WILLIAM B. BALL and granting MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (see order for full details). Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 06/07/2019. (zsb) (Entered: 06/13/2019)
2019-06-13		Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zsb) (Entered: 06/13/2019)
2019-06-13		MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the Clerk shall direct the USMS to perform service on Defendants. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 6/13/2019. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 06/13/2019)
2019-06-19	6	SUMMONS (7) Issued as to DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zeg) (Entered: 06/19/2019)
2019-07-09	7	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 6/21/2019. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/21/2019. (ztd) (Entered: 07/12/2019)
2019-07-15	8	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 7/2/2019. RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 7/2/2019 (tth) (Entered: 07/17/2019)
2019-07-19	9	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (Seabrook, April) (Entered: 07/19/2019)
2019-07-19		MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The Court ORDERS that Defendants shall file their Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by August 22, 2019. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 7/19/2019. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 07/19/2019)
2019-07-19		Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 8/22/2019. (znbn) (Entered: 07/19/2019)
2019-08-20	11	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION served on 8/19/2019; OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS served on 8/19/2019; UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE served on 8/19/2019 (ztth) (Entered: 08/26/2019)
2019-08-21	10	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (Seabrook, April) (Entered: 08/21/2019)
2019-08-22		MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The Court ORDERS that Defendants shall file their Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by September 25, 2019. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 08/22/2019. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 08/22/2019)
2019-08-22		Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 9/25/2019. (znbn) (Entered: 08/22/2019)
2019-09-24	12	MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Memorandum in Support, # 3 Declaration Tyrell (USSS), # 4 Declaration Hardy (FBI))(Seabrook, April) (Entered: 09/24/2019)
2019-09-24	13	ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' 12 Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment no later than October 24, 2019. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 09/24/2019. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 09/24/2019)
2019-09-24		Set/Reset Deadlines: Response to Dispositive Motions due by 10/24/2019. (lsj) (Entered: 09/24/2019)
2019-10-25	14	RESPONSE re 12 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by WILLIAM B. BALL. (ztd) (Entered: 10/29/2019)
2019-10-31	15	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 12 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (Seabrook, April) (Entered: 10/31/2019)
2019-10-31		MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 15 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Defendants shall file their reply by November 19, 2019. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/31/2019. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 10/31/2019)
2019-10-31		Set/Reset Deadlines: Replies due by 11/19/2019. (nbn) (Entered: 11/01/2019)
2019-11-19	16	MOTION to Amend/Correct Set/Reset Deadlines , MOTION for Leave to File AN AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Text of Proposed Order, # 3 Exhibit A - Amended Memo of Law)(Seabrook, April) (Entered: 11/19/2019)
2019-11-19		MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: 1) Defendants' 16 Motion is GRANTED; 2) Defendants' Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities is deemed FILED; and 3) Pro se Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the Amended Memorandum by December 10, 2019. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 11/19/2019. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 11/19/2019)
2019-11-19		Set/Reset Deadlines: Opposition due by 12/10/2019. (znbn) (Entered: 11/20/2019)
2019-11-19	17	AMENDED MEMORANDUM re 12 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE. (ztth) (Entered: 11/25/2019)
2019-12-02	18	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 12 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment by WILLIAM B. BALL. (ztth) (Entered: 12/05/2019)
2019-12-04		Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff opposition due by 1/24/2020. (nbn) (Entered: 12/06/2019)
2019-12-05		MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file his opposition to Defendants' 12 and 17 Motion to Dismiss by January 24, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 12/5/2019. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 12/05/2019)
2020-01-27	19	(AMENDED) RESPONSE re 12 MOTION to Dismiss, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by WILLIAM B. BALL. (ztth) (Entered: 01/30/2020)
2020-02-05	20	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 12 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (Seabrook, April) (Entered: 02/05/2020)
2020-02-06		MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 20 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Defendants shall file their reply by February 27, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 2/6/2020. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 02/06/2020)
2020-02-06		Set/Reset Deadlines: Replies due by 2/27/2020. (znbn) (Entered: 02/06/2020)
2020-02-26	21	REPLY to opposition to motion re 12 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE. (Seabrook, April) (Entered: 02/26/2020)
2020-03-06	22	ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 12 Motion to Dismiss. The Court ORDERS that: 1) Defendants FBI and USSS are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 2) The parties shall each submit a status report with proposed next steps in the case by March 20, 2020. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 3/6/2020. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 03/06/2020)
2020-03-06	23	MEMORANDUM OPINION re 22 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 3/6/2020. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 03/06/2020)
2020-03-09	24	MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply by WILLIAM B. BALL. (ztth) (Entered: 03/12/2020)
2020-03-12		MINUTE ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 3/12/2020. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 03/12/2020)
2020-03-13	25	NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Cirino on behalf of All Defendants (Cirino, Paul) (Entered: 03/13/2020)
2020-03-20	26	ANSWER to 1 Complaint by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE.(Cirino, Paul) (Entered: 03/20/2020)
2020-03-20	27	STATUS REPORT by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cirino, Paul) (Entered: 03/20/2020)
2020-03-20		MINUTE ORDER ADOPTING Defendants' 27 Joint Status Report. The Court ORDERS that, within 45 days, Plaintiff shall notify the Court and Defendants whether he is challenging: (1) the adequacy of USMS's and DHS's searches for records responsive to his FOIA requests; (2) DHS's withholdings and, if so, which withholdings Plaintiff claims to be improper; and/or (3) Treasury's final response. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 3/20/2020. (lcjeb3) (Entered: 03/20/2020)
2020-05-04	28	NOTICE by WILLIAM B. BALL. (ztth) (Entered: 05/06/2020)
2020-05-06		MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that Defendants shall submit a proposed briefing schedule by May 20, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 5/6/2020. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 05/06/2020)
2020-05-06		Set/Reset Deadlines: Proposed Briefing Schedule due by 5/20/2020. (znbn) (Entered: 05/08/2020)
2020-05-20	29	PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE. (Cirino, Paul) (Entered: 05/20/2020)
2020-05-20		MINUTE ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the Defendants' 29 Proposed Briefing Schedule and ORDERS that: 1) Defendants motion for summary judgment shall be due on July 3, 2020; 2) Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to Defendants motion for summary judgment shall be due on September 1, 2020; 3) Defendants reply and opposition to Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment shall be due on September 30, 2020; and 4) Plaintiffs reply shall be due on November 28, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 5/20/2020. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 05/20/2020)
2020-05-20		Set/Reset Deadlines: Summary Judgment motions due by 7/3/2020. Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 9/1/2020. Cross Motions due by 9/1/2020. Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 9/30/2020. Response to Cross Motions due by 9/30/2020. Reply to Cross Motions due by 11/28/2020. (znbn) (Entered: 05/22/2020)
2020-07-02	30	MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Statement of Facts, # 3 Declaration of Toni Fuentes (w/ Exhibits 1-3), # 4 Declaration of Charlotte Luckstone (w/ Exhibits 1-3), # 5 Declaration of Michael Neufeld (w/ Exhibits 1-3), # 6 Text of Proposed Order)(Cirino, Paul) (Entered: 07/02/2020)
2020-07-06	31	ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's 30 Motion for Summary Judgment no later than August 3, 2020. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 7/6/2020. (lcjeb1) (Entered: 07/06/2020)
2020-07-06		Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 8/3/2020. (znbn) (Entered: 07/08/2020)
2020-07-21	32	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment by WILLIAM B. BALL. (ztth) (Entered: 07/28/2020)
2020-07-28		MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 32 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendants' 30 Motion for summary judgment by September 2, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 07/28/2020. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 07/28/2020)
2020-07-28		Set/Reset Deadlines: Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 9/2/2020. (znbn) (Entered: 07/28/2020)
2020-08-12	33	NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE. Attorney April Denise Seabrook terminated. (Seabrook, April) (Entered: 08/12/2020)
2020-09-01	34	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment by WILLIAM B. BALL (zrdj) (Entered: 09/03/2020)
2020-09-04		MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 34 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file his response by October 17, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 09/04/2020. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 09/04/2020)
2020-09-04		Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 10/17/2020. (znbn) (Entered: 09/04/2020)
2020-10-22	35	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment by WILLIAM B. BALL (zrdj) (Entered: 10/23/2020)
2020-10-26		MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file his response by December 1, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/26/2020. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 10/26/2020)
2020-10-26		Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 12/1/2020. (znbn) (Entered: 10/26/2020)
2020-11-30	36	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment by WILLIAM B. BALL (ztth) (Entered: 12/02/2020)
2020-12-02		MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's 36 Motion for Extension is GRANTED, and he shall file his Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by January 15, 2021. This is the final extension. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 12/02/2020. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 12/02/2020)
2020-12-02		Set/Reset Deadlines: Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/15/2021. (znbn) (Entered: 12/03/2020)
2021-01-22		Partial Filing Fee Received from William B. Ball in the amount of $350.00, receipt number: 4616104869. (ztth) (Entered: 01/26/2021)
2021-01-22	39	RESPONSE re 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by WILLIAM B. BALL. (ztth) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/27/2021: # 1 Exhibit) (ztth). (Entered: 01/27/2021)
2021-01-26	37	ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) Defendants' 30 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and (2) Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 1/26/2021. (lcjeb3) (Entered: 01/26/2021)
2021-01-26	38	MEMORANDUM OPINION re 37 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 1/26/2021. (lcjeb3) (Entered: 01/26/2021)
2021-02-04	40	MOTION to Place Exhibit Under Seal re 39 Response to motion by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cirino, Paul) (Entered: 02/04/2021)
2021-02-04		MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 40 Motion to Place Exhibit Under Seal. The Court ORDERS that the Clerk shall PLACE UNDER SEAL Exhibit 7 to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 39-1 at PDF pages 23-25. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 2/4/2021. (lcjeb2) (Entered: 02/04/2021)
Hide Docket Events