Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleWhite v. Executive Office of US Attorneys et al
DistrictSouthern District of Illinois
CityEast St. Louis
Case Number3:2018cv00841
Date Filed2018-04-09
Date Closed2021-12-23
JudgeMagistrate Judge Reona J. Daly
PlaintiffWilliam A. White
Case DescriptionWilliam White, a federal prisoner, submitted a FOIA request to the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys and the FBI for records about himself. After the agency failed to respond, White filed suit.
Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit

DefendantExecutive Office of US Attorneys
DefendantFederal Bureau of Investigation
DefendantDepartment of Justice
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Opinion/Order [53]
Opinion/Order [61]
Opinion/Order [62]
FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in Illinois has ruled that prisoner William White either failed to exhaust his administrative remedies or failed to perfect many of his requests to the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys for records concerning his prosecution and conviction in the Western District of Virginia. White submitted his request to the Western District rather than EOUSA headquarters. WDVA responded within the statutory 20 work-day time limit, telling White that because he had not provided a certificate of identity, it would close the request. White then resubmitted the request to EOUSA, providing the required certificate of identity. EOUSA forwarded the request to WDVA to process. WDVA told White it had found 20,000 potentially responsive records. WDVA indicated that it would take an estimated 8-10 hours to search and review the records for exemptions and asked White to submit $400 to cover the additional 8-10 hours. Instead, White sent a letter indicating that he should be considered a member of the news media for fee purposes. WDVA then administratively closed the request. White argued that since the agency failed to respond within 30 days, it could not collect fees. The agency, however, claimed that because White's request involved more than 5,000 pages, it qualified for unusual circumstances. White appealed the fee determination to the Office of Information Policy, which upheld the agency's fee determination 163 days later. He then claimed that OIP's failure to respond within 20 days prohibited the agency from assessing fees. The court disagreed, noting instead that "while the Court finds the delay in the OIP's final determination served to constructively exhaust Plaintiff's administrative remedies, it does not serve to waive the agency's assessment of search fees. Constructive exhaustion does not relieve Plaintiff of his statutory obligation to pay any and all fees which the agency was authorized to collect. Plaintiff has abandoned the claim he is entitled to a fee waiver as a member of the news media and therefore the assessment of search fees was permissible." White had submitted requests for records pertaining to his Virginia prosecution as well as prosecutions in Illinois and Florida. The agency told the court that it had closed the requests because White failed to certify his identity. However, EOUSA could not produce any records confirming that correspondence and asked the court for a presumption of good faith in assuming that the letters had been sent. While White asked the court to force the agency to provide the responsive records within 120 days, the court indicated that "it is appropriate to require the agency to provide the necessary information to permit the Court to determine whether FOIA requires the release of documents. Defendant EOUSA is ordered to reopen Plaintiff's FOIA request and conduct a reasonable search of records responsive to these requests within 30 day."
Issues: Request - Perfected request, Litigation - Jurisdiction - Failure to Exhaust
Opinion/Order [67]
FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in Illinois has ruled that prisoner William White failed to show that the FBI was improperly responding to a series of voluminous FOIA requests primarily focused on white supremacist groups. White submitted six FOIA requests to the FBI covering 57 subjects. In defending its actions, the FBI told Magistrate Judge Reona Daly that its responses to White's requests fell into five separate categories. Two of those categories included instances in which White had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies or had received a Glomar response neither confirming nor denying the existence of records. For two other categories the FBI had either located responsive records and was processing them for release or had conducted a search and found no responsive records. The fifth category encompassed requests where the FBI had identified responsive records but had withheld them categorically under Exemption 7(A) (interference with ongoing investigation or proceeding). One of White's requests was for records on Michael Lefkow, who was deceased. The agency found approximately 20,000 responsive pages, asked for and received an advanced payment of $297.50, and then agreed to process the request at a rate of 500 pages a month. White challenged the agency's rate of 500 pages a month as being too slow under the circumstances. But Daly pointed out that "it is true that it is improper to inquire into the requester's public interest motive for his request when determining whether the agency must respond, but this Court believes it is entirely appropriate to consider it when determining how and when the agency must respond." Daly observed that "while he may be entitled to all of the non-excluded records he seeks, he is not entitled to them next week, or even next year." Noting that in National Security Counselors v. Dept of Justice, 848 F.3d 467 (D.C. Cir. 2017), the D.C. Circuit had upheld the FBI's policy of disclosing pages at a rate of 500 pages a month, Daley pointed out that "given the larger volume and complexity of responding to Plaintiff's request, releasing documents at the rate of 500 pages a month balances the need for transparency in government with the allocation of the FBI's limited resources." White also complained that the FBI had improperly aggregated ten of his requests together for fee purposes. In response, Daley noted that "the FBI reasonably believed a number of Plaintiff's requests involved related matters. The Court finds under the circumstances there is a reasonable basis for determining that aggregation is warranted." The FBI issued a Glomar response for records concerning a white supremacists rally in Pikesville, Kentucky that had been under surveillance, asserting Exemption 7(D) (confidential sources) as the basis for its Glomar response. Approving the use of the exemption under the circumstances, Daley indicated that "plaintiff's request was most certainly aimed at gaining information regarding the FBI's use of informants at the Pikesville rally. While a broader interpretation is possible, the Court finds the FBI's understanding of the request was not unreasonable. The FBI's Glomar response was appropriate and it did not violate FOIA by responding that it could not reveal records regarding the use of confidential informants." White argued that one individual whose records he had requested waived his privacy rights by appearing on television. Daley disagreed, noting that "the fact that someone is shown on national television does not indicate that individual has waived his privacy interests as to the existence of records held by a federal agency." She added that "Plaintiff's declaration as to what he believes he saw on CNN is not sufficient to outweigh the privacy interest of the third party." Daley agreed with the FBI's responses were appropriate. Noting that processing some of White's requests at a rate of 500 pages a month would extend the case for nine years, Daley dismissed the case instead, explaining instead that "it is not in the interest of judicial efficiency to leave a case languishing on the Court's docket for such a lengthy period of time. Should the FBI stop processing the records at the rate of 500 pages per month, Plaintiff may have a new FOIA claim. The Court's granting of summary judgement on this count should be interpreted as a review only of the FBI's actions up to the date of this Order."
Issues: Fees - Aggregated requests, Fees - Advance Payment
Opinion/Order [87]
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2018-04-091COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William A. White.(kdb) (Entered: 04/09/2018)
2018-04-092MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William A. White. (kdb) (Entered: 04/09/2018)
2018-04-093Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan and Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly assigned. All future documents must bear case number 18-841-MJR-RJD. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. Refer to the pro se litigant guide, found on the ILSD website, for further information. (kdb) (Entered: 04/09/2018)
2018-04-164ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2 ). A federal court may permit an indigent party to proceed without pre-payment of fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The Court is not satisfied from White's affidavit that he is indigent. According to Plaintiff's motion, his national 6 month deposits totaled $3,310.00 as of April 3, 2018 (Doc. 2 , p. 13). In addition, Plaintiff's national 6 month average daily balance was $486.81. id. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2 ). Plaintiff shall pay the $400.00 filing fee no later than May 16, 2018. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with a court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 4/13/2018. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 04/16/2018)
2018-04-195MOTION to Recuse Judge Michael Reagan Pursuant to 28 USC 144 and 28 USC 455 by William A. White. (tkm) (Entered: 04/19/2018)
2018-04-206ORDER denying 5 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 4/20/2018. (rah) (Entered: 04/20/2018)
2018-04-247MOTION to have the US Marshals Service Serve Process by William A. White. (kdb) (Entered: 04/24/2018)
2018-04-26Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 34625083605. (jsm2) (Entered: 04/26/2018)
2018-06-078MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint by William A. White. (kdb) (Entered: 06/07/2018)
2018-06-129ORDER GRANTING 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint filed by William A. White. The Complaint has not yet been served therefore amendment as a matter of course is appropriate at this time. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Proposed Amended Complaint as the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 6/12/2018. (ely)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 06/12/2018)
2018-06-1210FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William A. White.(lmb) (Entered: 06/13/2018)
2018-11-1311ORDER: The Court exercises its discretion to DENY the request for service of process at government expense (Doc. 7 ). Plaintiff shall be required to effectuate service of process by Tuesday, January 1, 2019. Plaintiff must also submit proof of the same to the Court by that date. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of the action for failure to comply with court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(b). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 11/13/2018. (rah) (Entered: 11/13/2018)
2018-12-0312Summons Requested. (kdb) (Entered: 12/03/2018)
2018-12-0313Summons Issued as to Executive Office of US Attorneys, Federal Bureau of Investigation and originals and 2 copies mailed to William White. (kdb) (Entered: 12/03/2018)
2018-12-1414SUMMONS Returned Executed by William A. White. Executive Office of US Attorneys served on 12/10/2018, answer due 2/8/2019; Federal Bureau of Investigation served on 12/10/2018, answer due 2/8/2019. (kdb) (Entered: 12/14/2018)
2019-01-2215MOTION for Entry of Default and Default Judgement by William A. White. (jaj) (Entered: 01/22/2019)
2019-01-2316ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. 15 ) is hereby DENIED . The Court generated response deadlines of February 8, 2019, when it received confirmation that defendants had been served. Those deadlines are appropriate and are set more than 30 days beyond the date of service for good cause in light of the current government shutdown. To the extent necessary, the deadlines will be extended further via a later motion to continue. The statute, 5 U.S.C. Section 552 allows for extensions for good cause shown, accordingly these extensions are appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/23/2019. (rah)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 01/23/2019)
2019-01-2517NOTICE of Appearance by Suzanne M. Garrison on behalf of Department of Justice (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 01/25/2019)
2019-01-2518MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 10 Amended Complaint by Department of Justice. (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 01/25/2019)
2019-01-2819NOTICE OF ACTION re 17 Notice of Appearance filed by Department of Justice. Filer did not include a certificate of service as the last page of this document since pro se parties are involved. Filer should notify the court that they in fact sent to pro se plaintiff a copy of Doc. 17. Please consult the ECF User Manual and Local Rules for further instruction. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 01/28/2019)
2019-01-2820ORDER GRANTING 18 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 10 Amended Complaint filed by Department of Justice. For good cause shown, Defendants are GRANTED an extension of time, up to and including 3/8/2019, to file an answer or otherwise respond. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 1/28/2019. (ely)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 01/28/2019)
2019-01-2921CJRA TRACK B assigned: Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/1/2020 at 10:00 AM in East St. Louis Courthouse before Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan. Bench Trial set for 5/11/2020 at 9:00 AM in East St. Louis Courthouse before Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan. (Attachments: # 1 Consent to Magistrate Judge)(rah) (Entered: 01/29/2019)
2019-02-0422RESPONSE to 18 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by William A. White. (jaj) (Entered: 02/04/2019)
2019-03-0623Case Reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle. Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan no longer assigned to the case. (cds) (Entered: 03/06/2019)
2019-03-0824ANSWER to 10 Amended Complaint by Department of Justice, Executive Office of US Attorneys, Federal Bureau of Investigation.(Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 03/08/2019)
2019-03-1825NOTICE of Updated Litigation History by William A. White. (kdb) (Entered: 03/18/2019)
2019-04-0426ORDER: Due to the recent reassignment of this case to Judge Staci M. Yandle, the Final Pretrial Conference is reset for 4/29/2020 at 9:30 AM in Benton Courthouse before Judge Staci M. Yandle and Bench Trial is reset for 5/11/2020 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Judge Staci M. Yandle. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 4/4/2019. (slh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 04/04/2019)
2019-05-2827MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Department of Justice. Responses due by 7/1/2019 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Att 1 Wilkinson Delcaration, # 2 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit Att. 1 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit Att 2 Bradley Declaration)(Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 05/28/2019)
2019-05-2828NOTICE by Department of Justice Notice to Pro Se Plaintiff of Consequences of Failing to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 05/28/2019)
2019-05-2829EXHIBIT by Department of Justice. Exhibit to 27 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment,, Redacted Exhibit 7 . (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 05/28/2019)
2019-05-2830NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re 27 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment,, filed by Department of Justice. Exhibit 7 removed at the filers request. Exhibit 7 will be refiled. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 05/28/2019)
2019-06-0731RESPONSE to Motion re 27 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by William A. White. (jaj) (Entered: 06/07/2019)
2019-06-0732MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by William A. White. Responses due by 7/11/2019 (jaj) (Entered: 06/07/2019)
2019-07-0833RESPONSE to Motion re 32 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Executive Office of US Attorneys. (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 07/08/2019)
2019-07-1834MOTION for Leave to File an Extended Reply Brief by William A. White. (kdb) (Entered: 07/18/2019)
2019-07-1835SECOND SWORN DECLARATION by William A. White. (Attachments: # 1 Part 2 of the Declaration(kdb) (Entered: 07/18/2019)
2019-08-0836MOTION for Extension of Time an Extended Motion for Summary Judgment by William A. White. (kdw) (Entered: 08/08/2019)
2019-08-0837MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by William A. White. Responses due by 9/12/2019 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(kdw) (Entered: 08/08/2019)
2019-08-2038RESPONSE to Motion re 37 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 08/20/2019)
2019-08-2939REPLY to Response to Motion re 37 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by William A. White. (kdw) (Entered: 08/29/2019)
2019-10-1540STATUS REPORT and Request for Briefing Schedule by Department of Justice. (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 10/15/2019)
2019-10-1741ORDER: Dispositive Motions due by 1/10/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 10/17/2019. (ely)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 10/17/2019)
2019-10-1842ORDER: Dispositive Motions due by 1/10/2020. Docket entry 41 incorrectly stated the due date year. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 10/18/2019. (ely)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 10/18/2019)
2019-11-2043ORDER: Pursuant to Administrative Order 257, this case has been selected for reassignment to a Magistrate Judge. Within 21 days of this Order, any party not previously having filed a Notice and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form in this case must file the attached form indicating that party's consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent due by 12/11/2019.. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 11/20/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Administrative Order)(mar) (Entered: 11/20/2019)
2019-12-0244MOTION Motion to File an Oversized Brief by Department of Justice. (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 12/02/2019)
2019-12-0645CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) unsealed on 12/12/2019 (trb). (Entered: 12/09/2019)
2019-12-1146CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Garrison, Suzanne) unsealed on 12/12/2019 (trb). (Entered: 12/11/2019)
2019-12-1247FINAL CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Garrison, Suzanne) unsealed on 12/12/2019 (trb). (Entered: 12/12/2019)
2019-12-1248ORDER: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, this case is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. The Magistrate Judge shall conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. Judge Staci M. Yandle no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 18-841-RJD. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 12/12/2019. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 12/12/2019)
2019-12-2049ORDER: GRANTING 34 MOTION for Leave to File filed by William A. White. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a 10 page Reply brief. GRANTING 36 MOTION for Extended Motion filed by William A. White. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a 29 page Motion for Summary Judgment. GRANTING 44 MOTION Motion to File an Oversized Brief filed by Department of Justice. Defendant Department of Justice is GRANTED leave to file a combined motion for summary judgment and memorandum of up to 45 pages in length. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 12/20/2019. (ely)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 12/20/2019)
2019-12-2350NOTICE OF CANCELLATION of Hearings: The Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/29/2020 and Bench Trial set for 5/11/2020 before Judge Staci M. Yandle are VACATED. (slh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 12/23/2019)
2020-01-1051MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to FBI FOIA requests by Department of Justice. Responses due by 2/13/2020 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A-1 to A-6, # 3 Exhibit Exhiibt B Chart)(Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 01/10/2020)
2020-01-1052NOTICE by Department of Justice to Pro Se Plaintiff of Consequences of Failing to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 01/10/2020)
2020-01-2153ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 27 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Department of Justice; DENYING 32 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by William A. White. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 1/21/2020. (ely) (Entered: 01/21/2020)
2020-01-2754MOTION for Leave to File Extended Response by William A. White. Proposed Amended Response received this date and under review. (jaj) (Entered: 01/27/2020)
2020-01-2755ORDER GRANTING 54 MOTION for Leave to File filed by William A. White. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a 26-page Response. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's proposed document as a Response to Document 51 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 1/27/2020. (ely)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 01/27/2020)
2020-01-2756RESPONSE to 51 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed by William A. White. (Attachments: # 1 part 2)(trb) (Entered: 01/28/2020)
2020-02-0557MOTION for Litigation Cost by William A. White. (kdw) (Entered: 02/05/2020)
2020-02-1458RESPONSE to Motion re 57 MOTION For Costs filed by Department of Justice. (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 02/14/2020)
2020-02-1959STATUS REPORT regarding EOUSA FOIA responses by Department of Justice. (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 02/19/2020)
2020-03-0460RESPONSE to 59 Status Report filed by William A. White. (kdw) (Entered: 03/05/2020)
2020-03-1761ORDER DENYING 37 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by William A. White; GRANTING 51 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to FBI FOIA requests filed by Department of Justice. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on counts 6-9, 11, 13-16, 18-27, 29, and 31 at the close of the case; and the parties are ORDERED to respond to the Courts proposed entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 56(f) on counts 3-5, 10, 12, 17, 28, 30, 32-33 by 4/16/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 3/17/2020. (ely) (Entered: 03/17/2020)
2020-03-1962ORDER DENYING 57 MOTION for Litigation Costs filed by William A. White. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 3/19/2020. (ely) (Entered: 03/19/2020)
2020-03-3163MOTION to Vacate 62 Order by William A. White. (jaj) (Entered: 03/31/2020)
2020-04-0764MOTION for Reconsideration and Objection to 61 Order by William A. White. (jaj) (Entered: 04/07/2020)
2020-04-1665RESPONSE to 61 Order,,, Terminate Motions,,, Set Deadlines,, filed by Department of Justice. (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 04/16/2020)
2020-04-2366ORDER DENYING 63 MOTION to Vacate 62 Order filed by William A. White. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 4/23/2020. (ely) (Entered: 04/23/2020)
2020-04-2367ORDER DENYING 64 MOTION for Reconsideration re 61 Order filed by William A. White. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on counts 3-5, 10, 12, 17, 28, 30, 32-33 at the close of the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 4/23/2020. (ely) (Entered: 04/23/2020)
2020-05-1268AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 67 Order, 61 Order, by William A. White. (jaj) (Entered: 05/12/2020)
2020-05-1269Transmission of Short Record to US Court of Appeals re 68 Notice of Appeal. (kdw) (Entered: 05/12/2020)
2020-05-1270Rule 10 Letter. (kdw) (Entered: 05/12/2020)
2020-05-1371USCA Case Number 20-1798 for 68 Notice of Appeal filed by William A. White. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Case Opening, # 2 PLRA Fee and Notice)(kdw) (Entered: 05/13/2020)
2020-06-0172TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION SHEET by Pro Se Party. (kdw) (Entered: 06/01/2020)
2020-06-0273USCA Appeal Fees received $ 505 receipt number 34625101833 re 68 Notice of Appeal filed by William A. White (cds) (Entered: 06/15/2020)
2020-07-0674NOTICE by Executive Office of US Attorneys regarding first installment of EOUSA material (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 07/06/2020)
2020-07-1575NOTICE by Department of Justice regarding second installment of EOUSA documents (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 07/15/2020)
2020-08-2476NOTICE by Department of Justice of Third Installment of Release of EOUSA FOIA Documents (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 08/24/2020)
2020-09-1877NOTICE by Department of Justice Notice of Fourth Release of EOUSA FOIA Materials (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 09/18/2020)
2020-11-0978NOTICE by Department of Justice of Fifth Release of EOUSA FOIA Materials (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 11/09/2020)
2020-11-2379NOTICE by Department of Justice of Sixth Release of EOUSA FOIA Materials (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 11/23/2020)
2021-01-0580NOTICE by Department of Justice, Executive Office of US Attorneys, Federal Bureau of Investigation of Seventh Release of EOUSA Materials (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 01/05/2021)
2021-03-0181NOTICE by All Defendants of Eighth Release of EOUSA FOIA Materials (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 03/01/2021)
2021-04-2682NOTICE by All Defendants of Ninth Release of EOUSA FOIA Materials (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 04/26/2021)
2021-05-1783MANDATE of USCA as to 68 Notice of Appeal filed by William A. White (Attachments: # 1 Certified Order, # 2 Certified Judgment)(kdw) (Entered: 05/17/2021)
2021-09-1084NOTICE by Department of Justice OF TENTH RELEASE OF EOUSA FOIA MATERIALS (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 09/10/2021)
2021-10-2985NOTICE by Department of Justice OF ELEVENTH RELEASE OF EOUSA FOIA MATERIALS (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
2021-12-0686NOTICE by Department of Justice of Twelfth Release of EOUSA FOIA Materials (Garrison, Suzanne) (Entered: 12/06/2021)
2021-12-2287ORDER DISMISSING COUNT II WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 12/22/2021. (lmo) (Entered: 12/22/2021)
2021-12-2388JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. Approved by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 12/23/2021. (jlm) (Entered: 12/23/2021)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar