Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleHudson v. Dept. of Revenue and Finance et al
DistrictNorthern District of Illinois
CityChicago
Case Number1:2018cv07333
Date Filed2018-11-02
Date ClosedOpen
JudgeHonorable Gary Feinerman
PlaintiffGeorge W. Hudson, Jr. We the People of the United States - Estates/Disabled
DefendantDept. of Revenue and Finance
DefendantDept. of Streets and Sanitations
DefendantCorporation Counsel City of Chicago
DefendantMeyer Cherry and Associates
DefendantSt. Louis Pic-A-Part Auto
Documents
Docket
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2018-11-021RECEIVED Complaint and 5 copies by George W. Hudson, Jr. (jh, ) (Entered: 11/05/2018)
2018-11-022CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) (Entered: 11/05/2018)
2018-11-023PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff George W. Hudson, Jr. (jh, ) (Entered: 11/05/2018)
2018-11-024APPLICATION by Plaintiff George W. Hudson, Jr for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jh, ) (Entered: 11/05/2018)
2018-11-025MOTION by Plaintiff George W. Hudson, Jr for attorney representation. (jh, ) (Entered: 11/05/2018)
2018-11-068EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Gary Feinerman for all further proceedings puruant to 28 USC 294(b). Honorable Marvin E. Aspen no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/6/2018.(jh, ) (Entered: 11/06/2018)
2018-11-079NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) (Entered: 11/07/2018)
2018-11-1310MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is denied without prejudice for failure to answer Question 2B. Plaintiff has until 12/7/2018 to file a renewed in forma pauperis application. If Plaintiff files such an application, he should explain how he is able to clothe, feed, and shelter himself despite receiving no money during the last twelve months. If Plaintiff fails to comply, this case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Status hearing set for 12/17/2018 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 11/13/2018)
2018-12-0311APPLICATION by Plaintiff George W. Hudson, Jr for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (bg, ) (Entered: 12/04/2018)
2018-12-0312NOTICE of Motion by George W. Hudson, Jr for presentment of application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 11 before Honorable Gary Feinerman on 12/7/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Exhibit) (bg, ) (Entered: 12/04/2018)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar