Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleEXXON MOBIL CORPORATION v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
DistrictDistrict of Columbia
CityWashington, DC
Case Number1:2010cv00250
Date Filed2010-02-18
Date Closed2011-12-08
JudgeChief Judge Royce C. Lamberth
PlaintiffEXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
DefendantDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DefendantENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AppealD.C. Circuit 12-5029
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
Complaint attachment 2
Complaint attachment 3
Complaint attachment 4
Complaint attachment 5
Complaint attachment 6
Complaint attachment 7
Complaint attachment 8
Complaint attachment 9
Complaint attachment 10
Complaint attachment 11
Complaint attachment 12
Complaint attachment 13
Complaint attachment 14
Complaint attachment 15
Complaint attachment 16
Complaint attachment 17
Complaint attachment 18
Complaint attachment 19
Complaint attachment 20
Complaint attachment 21
Complaint attachment 22
Complaint attachment 23
Complaint attachment 24
Complaint attachment 25
Complaint attachment 26
Complaint attachment 27
Complaint attachment 28
Complaint attachment 29
Complaint attachment 30
Complaint attachment 31
Complaint attachment 32
Complaint attachment 33
Complaint attachment 34
Complaint attachment 35
Complaint attachment 36
Complaint attachment 37
Complaint attachment 38
Complaint attachment 39
Complaint attachment 40
Complaint attachment 41
Complaint attachment 42
Complaint attachment 43
Complaint attachment 44
Opinion/Order [31]
FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Royce Lamberth has ruled that research data from two studies funded by the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trust Council is not an agency record for purposes of FOIA. The Council was set up in 1992 to oversee the use of $900 million in settlement funds paid by Exxon because of the 1989 oil spill caused by the Exxon Valdez in Prince William Sound, Alaska. The council consists of three federal membersâ€"from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Agriculture Department, and Interior Departmentâ€"and three State of Alaska members. The Council solicits project proposals but has no independent fiscal authority. The council awarded a proposal to Dr. Jacqueline Michel of Research Planning, Dr. Jeffrey Short of the Auke Bay Laboratory of the National Marine Fisheries Service, and Dr. Gail Irvine of the U.S. Geological Survey. The council awarded another proposal to Dr. Michel Boufadel of Temple University, Dr. Albert Venosa of the EPA, and Brian Wrenn of Washington University. ExxonMobil requested data from both studies from the Commerce Department. It also sent a request to the EPA for data from the Boufadel study. Commerce released a handful of documents and told ExxonMobil that most of the requested data were not agency records. The EPA released two draft reports and withheld a number of emails under Exemption 5 (deliberative process privilege). ExxonMobil did not appeal the Exemption 5 withholdings, but did challenge the EPA's claim that much of the Boufadel data was not an agency record. Lamberth noted that "the mere fact that a private researcher who created the requested records received federal funds to finance the research is insufficient to conclude that the data were 'created or obtained' by the agency, but data produced by a private researcher may be considered agency records if the researcher was acting on behalf of the agency. However, neither the Boufadel Study nor the Michel Study receives any funding from NOAA appropriations. Rather, all funding for the Boufadel and Michel Studies is derived from money transferred to NOAA from the $900 million civil settlement between Exxon and the Governments. NOAA has a limited, ministerial role in contracting with private organizations that are responding to proposals generated by and conducting research on behalf of the Trustee Council, rather than on behalf of one of the Trustee Council's trustee agencies. The Trustee Councilâ€"not NOAAâ€"is responsible for soliciting project proposals, administering the proposal process, and developing workplans based on the recommendations. . .NOAA's position as one of the federal trustees on the Trustee Council does not change the fact that the Boufadel and Michel Studies were conducted by private researchers for the benefit of the Trustee Council, and were not funded by nor conducted on behalf of the Trustee Council's trustee agencies." Even assuming NOAA was more directly involved in overseeing the studies, Lamberth pointed out that "Dr. Boufadel and Dr. Michel are not obligated to turn over to the Trustee Council the preliminary models and data that Exxon requested; rather, they will merely relinquish control over the final reports once their projects are complete, at which point the final reports will become public information." As far as control was concerned, Lamberth noted that "there is also no evidence that any other NOAA personnel, including any of the personnel at the Auke Bay Laboratory or the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Office, read or relied upon the other Boufadel and Michel data or reports that Exxon seeks. As to the EPA, Lamberth observed that "EPA had no involvement in the Boufadel Project after the proposal stage, making clear that EPA did not create or obtain the requested materials and thus unquestionably fails to satisfy the first criterion of the 'agency records' test."
Issues: Agency Record - Constructive possession
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2010-02-181COMPLAINT against EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616027534) filed by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit Y, # 25 Exhibit Z, # 26 Exhibit AA, # 27 Exhibit BB, # 28 Exhibit CC, # 29 Exhibit DD, # 30 Exhibit EE, # 31 Exhibit FF, # 32 Exhibit GG, # 33 Exhibit HH, # 34 Exhibit II, # 35 Exhibit JJ, # 36 Exhibit KK, # 37 Exhibit LL, # 38 Exhibit MM, # 39 Exhibit NN, # 40 Exhibit OO, # 41 Exhibit PP, # 42 Exhibit QQ, # 43 Exhibit RR, # 44 Civil Cover Sheet)(zjf, ) (Entered: 02/22/2010)
2010-02-18SUMMONS (4) Issued as to DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zjf, ) (Entered: 02/22/2010)
2010-03-152NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Lo on behalf of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 03/15/2010)
2010-03-153NOTICE of Certificate of Service by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY re 2 Notice of Appearance (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 03/15/2010)
2010-03-164Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,,, by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 03/16/2010)
2010-03-29MINUTE ORDER granting 4 the defendants' consent motion for extension of time. The defendants shall respond to the complaint on or before 04/08/2010. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 03/29/2010. (lcrmu1) (Entered: 03/29/2010)
2010-03-29Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendants' Answer to the Complaint due on or before 4/8/2010 (tg, ) (Entered: 03/29/2010)
2010-03-305NOTICE of Change of Address by Jonathan D. Hacker (Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
2010-03-306AFFIDAVIT re 1 Complaint,,, Summons Issued as to AUSA / Affidavit of mailing by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION. (Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
2010-03-307AFFIDAVIT re 1 Complaint,,, Summons Issued as to AUSA / Affidavit of mailing by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION. (Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
2010-03-308SUMMONS Returned Executed by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE served on 2/22/2010, answer due 4/8/2010; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY served on 2/22/2010, answer due 4/8/2010. (See Docket Entries 6 and 7 to view documents). (znmw, ) (Entered: 03/31/2010)
2010-04-029Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,,, by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 04/02/2010)
2010-04-05MINUTE ORDER granting 9 the defendants' consent motion for extension of time. The defendants shall respond to the complaint on or before 05/10/2010. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 04/05/2010. (lcrmu1) (Entered: 04/05/2010)
2010-04-05Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendants' Answer due on or before 5/10/2010 (tg, ) (Entered: 04/05/2010)
2010-05-0510Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,,,, MOTION for Leave to File Extension Motion Out of Time by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-05-11MINUTE ORDER granting 10 the defendants' motion for extension of time. The defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before 06/09/2010. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 05/11/2010. (lcrmu1) (Entered: 05/11/2010)
2010-05-12Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer to the Complaint due by 6/9/2010 (tg, ) (Entered: 05/12/2010)
2010-06-0911ANSWER to 1 Complaint,,, by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.(Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 06/09/2010)
2010-06-1012STANDING ORDER signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 6/10/2010. Read the Standing Order carefully, it will govern this case. Failure to follow the Standing Order will result in sanctions.(tg, ) (Entered: 06/10/2010)
2010-06-15MINUTE ORDER. Before the court in this FOIA case are a complaint and an answer. The requirements of Local Civil Rule 16.3 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) do not apply in FOIA litigation. LCvR 16.3(b)(9); Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Thus, the defendant may file a dispositive motion or, in the alternative, file a report setting forth the schedule according to which it will complete its production of documents to the plaintiff on or before 07/15/2010. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 06/15/2010. (lcrmu1) (Entered: 06/15/2010)
2010-06-16Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendants' Dispositive Motion or, in the alternative, Scheduling Report due on or before 7/15/2010. (tg, ) (Entered: 06/16/2010)
2010-07-1513MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Declaration of Dr. Peter Hagen, # 3 Declaration of Craig R. O'Connor, # 4 Declaration of Dr. Stanley Rice, # 5 Declaration of Ellen Sebastian, # 6 Declaration of Cindy Kirchmer, # 7 Declaration of Albert Venosa, # 8 Text of Proposed Order)(Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 07/15/2010)
2010-07-2014MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-2715MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Carla Jean Christofferson, :Firm- OMelveny & Myers LLP, :Address- 400 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90071. Phone No. - (213) 430-6000. Fax No. - (213) 430-6407 ; Declaration of C. Christofferson by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-29MINUTE ORDER granting 14 the plaintiff's consent motion for extension of time. The plaintiff's opposition to the defendant's motion for summary judgment shall be filed on or before 09/01/2010. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 07/29/2010. (lcrmu1) (Entered: 07/29/2010)
2010-07-29MINUTE ORDER granting 15 the defendant's motion to admit Carla J. Christofferson pro hac vice. Carla J. Christofferson is hereby admitted to represent the plaintiff pro hac vice. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 07/29/2010. (lcrmu1) Modified to edit entry on 7/29/2010 (tg, ). (Entered: 07/29/2010)
2010-07-29Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment due by 9/1/2010. (tg, ) (Entered: 07/29/2010)
2010-09-0116Memorandum in opposition to re 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION. (Attachments: # 1 Separate Statement of Material Facts, # 2 Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 3 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 4 Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 5 Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 6 Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 7 Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 8 Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 9 Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 10 Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 11 Exhibit 9 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 12 Exhibit 10 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 13 Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 14 Exhibit 12 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 15 Exhibit 13 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 16 Exhibit 14 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 17 Exhibit 15 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 18 Exhibit 16 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 19 Exhibit 17 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 20 Exhibit 18 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 21 Exhibit 19 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 22 Exhibit 20 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 23 Exhibit 21 to the Declaration of Carla J. Chrisofferson, # 24 Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 25 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 26 Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 27 Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 28 Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 29 Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 30 Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 31 Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 32 Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 33 Exhibit 9 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 34 Exhibit 10 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 35 Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 36 Exhibit 12 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 37 Exhibit 13 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 38 Exhibit 14 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 39 Exhibit 15 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 40 Exhibit 16 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 41 Exhibit 17 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 42 Evid. Obj. to the Decl. of Dr. Albert Venosa, # 43 Evid. Obj. to the Decl. of Cindy Kirchmer, # 44 Evid. Obj. to the Decl. of Craig R. O'Connor, # 45 Evid. Obj. to the Decl. of Ellen Sebastian, # 46 Evid. Obj. to the Decl. of Dr. Peter Hagen, # 47 Evid. Obj. to the Decl. of Dr. Stanley Rice, # 48 Proposed Order, # 49 Certificate of Service)(Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/01/2010)
2010-09-0117Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION (Attachments: # 1 Separate Statement of Material Facts, # 2 Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 3 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 4 Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 5 Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 6 Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 7 Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 8 Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 9 Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 10 Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 11 Exhibit 9 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 12 Exhibit 10 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 13 Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 14 Exhibit 12 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 15 Exhibit 13 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 16 Exhibit 14 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 17 Exhibit 15 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 18 Exhibit 16 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 19 Exhibit 17 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 20 Exhibit 18 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 21 Exhibit 19 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 22 Exhibit 20 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 23 Exhibit 21 to the Declaration of Carla J. Christofferson, # 24 Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 25 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 26 Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 27 Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 28 Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 29 Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 30 Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 31 Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 32 Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 33 Exhibit 9 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 34 Exhibit 10 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 35 Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 36 Exhibit 12 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 37 Exhibit 13 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 38 Exhibit 14 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 39 Exhibit 15 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 40 Exhibit 16 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 41 Exhibit 17 to the Declaration of Barat Laporte, # 42 Proposed Order, # 43 Certificate of Service)(Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/01/2010)
2010-09-0318Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 17 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment, 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 09/03/2010)
2010-09-10MINUTE ORDER granting 18 the defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply in support of the defendants' motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment. The defendants shall submit their reply in support of defendants' motion for summary judgment at the same time that they submit their opposition to the plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment, and it is further ordered that Defendants shall file their reply and opposition by 10/20/10. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 09/10/10.(lcrmu1) (Entered: 09/10/2010)
2010-09-10Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment and their Reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment due by 10/20/2010. (tg, ) (Entered: 09/10/2010)
2010-10-1319Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 17 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment, 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 10/13/2010)
2010-10-13MINUTE ORDER granting 19 the parties' joint motion for an extension of time to file response/reply. It is ordered that the defendants shall have until 10/27/10 to submit their reply in support of their motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff shall until 11/17/10 to file the reply in support of the plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 10/13/10.(lcrmu1) Modified event title on 10/14/2010 (znmw, ). (Entered: 10/13/2010)
2010-10-13Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendants' Reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion due by 10/27/2010. Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to the Cross Motion due by 11/17/2010. (tg, ) (Entered: 10/14/2010)
2010-10-2720REPLY to opposition to motion re 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Peter Hagen, # 5 Supplemental Declaration of Craig R. O'Connor, # 6 Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Stanley Rice, # 7 Supplementary Declaration of Albert Venosa, # 8 Text of Proposed Order)(Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 10/27/2010)
2010-10-2721Memorandum in opposition to re 17 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment filed by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Peter Hagen, # 5 Supplemental Declaration of Craig R. O'Connor, # 6 Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Stanley Rice, # 7 Supplementary Declaration of Albert Venosa, # 8 Text of Proposed Order)(Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 10/27/2010)
2010-11-1722REPLY to opposition to motion re 17 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Carla Christofferson, # 2 Exhibit 1 to the Supplemental Declaration of Carla Christofferson, # 3 Exhibit 2 to the Supplemental Declaration of Carla Christofferson, # 4 Exhibit 3 to the Supplemental Declaration of Carla Christofferson)(Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 11/17/2010)
2010-11-1723RESPONSE re 21 Memorandum in Opposition,, /Evidentiary Objections to the Supplemental Declarations of Mr. Craig O'Connor, Dr. Peter Hagen, Dr. Stanley Rice and Dr. Albert Venosa filed by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION. (Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 11/17/2010)
2010-11-1724REPLY re 21 Memorandum in Opposition,, /Reply to Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Separate Statement of Material Facts not in Genuine Dispute (see exh. A to dkt item 21) filed by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION. (Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 11/17/2010)
2010-12-0725MOTION for Leave to File Surreply in Further Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Surreply, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 12/07/2010)
2010-12-2126Memorandum in opposition to re 25 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply in Further Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hacker, Jonathan) (Entered: 12/21/2010)
2011-01-0327REPLY to opposition to motion re 25 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply in Further Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 01/03/2011)
2011-01-20Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge Robert L. Wilkins. Judge Ricardo M. Urbina no longer assigned to the case. (gt, ) (Entered: 01/20/2011)
2011-04-19MINUTE ORDER denying 25 Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Further Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins on 4/19/2011. (tcb) . (Entered: 04/19/2011)
2011-08-3128NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Attachments: # 1 D.C. Circuit opinion)(Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 08/31/2011)
2011-10-0729Case Reassigned to Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth. Judge Robert L. Wilkins no longer assigned to the case. (jeb, ) (Entered: 10/07/2011)
2011-12-0830ORDER granting 13 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 17 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on December 8, 2011. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 12/08/2011)
2011-12-0831MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on December 8, 2011. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 12/08/2011)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar