| Date Filed | Doc # | Docket Text |
|
| 2010-11-15 | | LODGED COMPLAINT sought to be filed by Petitioner Mark Bond. (esa) (Entered: 11/19/2010) |
| 2010-11-15 | 1 | NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH LODGING OF COMPLAINT mailed to petitioner Mark Bond. Upon submission of your complaint it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the CV60P form attached. If you do not respond within 30 days of the date of this letter your action will be dismissed. Re Lodged Complaint (Attachments: # 1 lodged complaint) (esa) (Entered: 11/19/2010) |
| 2010-12-15 | 2 | REQUEST to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Petitioner Mark Bond. (et) (Entered: 12/15/2010) |
| 2010-12-20 | 3 | ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi: granting 2 Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. (et) (Entered: 12/21/2010) |
| 2010-12-20 | 4 | MANDAMUS/COMPLAINT against Defendant LA County Assessors Office. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich. (Filing fee $ 350: IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED.), filed by Petitioner Mark Bond. (et) (Entered: 12/21/2010) |
| 2010-12-21 | 5 | STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge R Gary Klausner. The Responsibility for the progress of litigation in the Federal Courts falls not only upon the attorneys in the action but upon the Court as well. To secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action, all counsel are hereby ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures (See document for further details) (shb) (Entered: 12/22/2010) |
| 2011-02-11 | 6 | MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSE FROM L.A. COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE filed by Petitioner Mark Bond. (mz) (Entered: 02/18/2011) |
| 2011-02-17 | 7 | NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich ORDERING Motion to Compel submitted by Petitioner Mark Bond received on 2/11/11 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk. (mz) (Entered: 02/18/2011) |
| 2011-04-18 | 8 | NOTICE: REFUSAL TO COMPLY filed by Petitioner Mark Bond. (mz) (Entered: 04/21/2011) |
| 2011-07-25 | 9 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS MOTION TO COMPEL by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich: denying 6 Motion to Compel. Petitioners motion is denied without prejudice to its renewal on the basis of a more adequate record and in a procedurally proper fashion. IT IS SO ORDERED. (mz) (Entered: 07/26/2011) |
| 2011-08-11 | 10 | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge R. Gary Klausner re Dismissal re Lack of Prosecution. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/24/2011. (rne) (Entered: 08/11/2011) |
| 2011-08-15 | 11 | MINUTE: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF JURISDICTION: On December 20, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant seeking a writ ofmandamus for disclosure of public information or public records and damages in the amount of $50,000. Plaintiff's alleges his claim under Cal. Govt. Code § § 6250-6270 and 5 U.S.C. § 552. Pursuant to the language of 5 U.S.C. § 552, "agency" is defined as an "authority of the Government of the United States." Defendant is not an "agency" under this definition. Therefore, it appears that federal subject matter jurisdiction may be lacking. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff shall file his response no later than August 24, 2011. Failure to timely and adequately respond to this OSC will result in dismissal of this action IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (ir) (Entered: 08/15/2011) |
| 2011-08-15 | 12 | (FIRST) AMENDED COMPLAINT against Respondent LA County Assessors Office amending Complaint 4 , filed by Petitioner Mark Bond (shb) (Entered: 08/25/2011) |
| 2011-10-03 | 15 | PROOF OF SERVICE and Affidavit of Earnee Windell Smith filed by Plaintiff Mark Bond, re Complaint 4 served on 9/29/2011. (rne) (Entered: 10/20/2011) |
| 2011-10-14 | 13 | MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF JURISDICTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff shall file his response no later than 11/4/2011. (vdr) (Entered: 10/14/2011) |
| 2011-10-19 | 14 | NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge R. Gary Klausner, ORDERING Complaint/Mandamus submitted by Petitioner Mark Bond received on 10/3/2011 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: First Amended Complaint was filed on 8/15/2011. Subsequent complaint requires leave of Court. (vdr) (Entered: 10/20/2011) |
| 2011-10-24 | 16 | REQUEST for Extension of Time to File Document filed by Petitioner Mark Bond. (vdr) (Entered: 10/26/2011) |
| 2011-10-27 | 17 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Plaintiffs request 16 for extension of time to respond to the Order to Show Cause is granted. Plaintiff shall file his response no later than 11/18/2011. (vdr) (Entered: 10/27/2011) |
| 2011-11-23 | 18 | MINUTE IN CHAMBERS Order Dismissing Case for Failure to Respond to Order to Show Cause re: Lack of Jurisdiction by Judge R. Gary Klausner: On 10/14/2011 this Court issued Plaintiff an Order to Show Cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (DE 13). Plaintiff was given until 11/4/2011 to show cause in writing; failure to do so would result in dismissal of the action. On 10/24/2011 Plaintiff requested additional time with the Court and was granted an extension on the Order to Show Cause until 11/18/2011. Plaintiff has not filed a written response to the Order to Show Cause and therefore this case is dismissed. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 11/23/2011) |
 Hide Docket Events |
