Case Detail
Case Title | MCKINLEY v. FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY et al | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Columbia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Washington, DC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2010cv01165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2010-07-12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2012-01-26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | VERN MCKINLEY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appeal | D.C. Circuit 12-5267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Opinion/Order [15] FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Henry Kennedy has ruled that the Federal Housing Finance Agency properly withheld three documents under Exemption 5 (privileges), but had not yet shown whether or not portions of two documents could be released after redaction. Vern McKinley asked the FHFA for records pertaining to its decision to establish a conservatorship for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac rather than putting the two institutions into receivership. The Office of General Counsel found three responsive documents, but withheld all of them under Exemption 5 claiming both the deliberative process privilege and the attorney work-product privilege. McKinley argued that the documents could not be deliberative unless the agency could show disclosure would harm its decisionmaking process. Citing the recent decision in McKinley's D.C. Circuit case against the Federal Reserve, McKinley v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (D.C. Cir. 2011), Kennedy pointed out that "the D.C. Circuit explained that 'Congress enacted FOIA Exemption 5. . .precisely because it determined that disclosure of material that is both predecisional and deliberative does harm an agency's decisionmaking process.' The D.C. Circuit further explained that it would be impractical for courts to determine on a case-by-case basis whether the release of predecisional materials would be harmful. It is thus clear that McKinley's position rests on an erroneous understanding of what must be shown for the deliberative process privilege to apply." Kennedy then noted that the FHFA had not undertaken a segregability analysis because it claimed the documents were protected by the attorney-work product privilege as well, which is not subject to a segregability analysis. McKinley contended that the documents were written to explain the agency's decision, not in preparation of litigation. But the agency responded that the documents also were created in case Fannie or Freddie brought a legal challenge. Kennedy noted that "after reviewing the Vaughn Index, the Court cannot discern the proportion of the documents' contents that is devoted to the possibility of litigation, or the depth of that discussion. Likewise, the FHFA's affidavits are insufficient to establish that documents would have been creased in essentially similar form irrespective of the litigation." He ordered the agency to submit them for an in camera review.
Opinion/Order [21]Issues: Exemption 5 - Privileges - Deliberative process privilege - Deliberative, Segregability - Disclosure of all non-exempt records | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|