Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleMARJENHOFF v. PARSLEY
DistrictSouthern District of Indiana
CityIndianapolis
Case Number1:2012cv00252
Date Filed2012-02-21
Date Closed2012-05-25
JudgeJudge Jane Magnus-Stinson
PlaintiffBRUCE MARJENHOFF
DefendantDENNIS PARSLEY Chief of Police Bedford, Indiana
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
Opinion/Order [7]
Opinion/Order [9]
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2012-02-211COMPLAINT against DENNIS PARSLEY, filed by BRUCE MARJENHOFF. (Attachments: # 1 Miscellaneous Correspondence)(MSD) (Entered: 02/27/2012)
2012-02-272MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MSD) (Entered: 02/27/2012)
2012-02-283ENTRY - The plaintiff shall have through March 14, 2012, in which to either pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so. The clerk is directed to include a copy of Form AO 239 along with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/28/2012.(JKS) (Entered: 02/28/2012)
2012-03-144CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by BRUCE MARJENHOFF. (JKS) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
2012-03-145RECEIPT #IP028854 in the amount of $ 350.00 for Filing Fee, by BRUCE MARJENHOFF. (JKS) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
2012-05-016MOTION to Request Court Assistance in Serving Court Summons on Defendant, filed by Plaintiff BRUCE MARJENHOFF. (JKS) (Entered: 05/01/2012)
2012-05-147ENTRY Discussing Selected Matters - In light of the circumstances recited in Part II of this Entry, the plaintiff shall have through June 7, 2012, in which to supplement his complaint by setting forth a basis for the exercise of jurisdiction over his claim. The plaintiffs motion requesting the courts assistance in serving process 6 is denied without prejudice because in the particular circumstances outlined above there is no reason at present to issue or serve process on the defendant. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/14/2012. (copy to Plaintiff, along with copy of Complaint and Docket Sheet as instructed, via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 05/14/2012)
2012-05-218MOTION to Supplement, filed by Plaintiff BRUCE MARJENHOFF. (JKS) (Entered: 05/22/2012)
2012-05-259ENTRY and ORDER Dismissing Action- The plaintiff's motion to supplement 8 is granted. This motion is the plaintiff's response to directions in Part II of the Entry issued on May 14, 2012. For the reasons explained in Part II of this Entry, therefore, this action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/25/2012. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 05/29/2012)
2012-05-2510CLOSED JUDGMENT - The court, having this day made its 9 Entry, IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that this cause of action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/25/2012. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 05/29/2012)
2012-06-0111NOTIFICATION of Summons being Enforced, filed by Plaintiff BRUCE MARJENHOFF. (JKS) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-0412ENTRY and NOTICE - This action has been dismissed. Any summons issued in this case is quashed because the service of that document would not be a meaningful event in the lawsuit. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/4/2012. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 06/04/2012)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar