Case Detail
Case Title | Orly Taitz v. Colvin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Maryland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Baltimore | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2013cv01878 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2013-06-25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2014-05-13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Ellen L. Hollander | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | Defend Our Freedoms Foundation TERMINATED: 07/08/2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | Orly Taitz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | Carolyn Colvin Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | SSA Notify | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appeal | Fourth Circuit 14-1773 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Complaint attachment 3 Complaint attachment 4 Opinion/Order [18] Opinion/Order [36] FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in Maryland has allowed Orly Taitz to amend her complaint against the Social Security Administration to challenge the agency's search rather than whether or not it properly responded to Taitz's request for Social Security Number applications for Harrison Bounel, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and Stanley Ann Dunham, President Obama's mother. Taitz indicated that because Bounel was born in 1890, his Social Security application fell within the 120-year rule requiring disclosure without proof of death. The agency responded by disclosing the applications for Tsarnaev and Dunham, but told Taitz it did not find an application for Bounel. The court explained that "in regard to the adequacy of the search, plaintiff's arguments that the SSA has failed to meet its obligations under FOIA may have merit." The court pointed out that the agency's affidavit indicated that "a search of the Numident for a record that matched the information provided by Plaintiff could not locate a record for Mr. Bounel." But the court observed that the agency "did not explain the manner in which the search was conducted, whether multiple searches were conducted using different combinations of the information provided by plaintiff (to ensure that a minor discrepancy in the information submitted by plaintiff did not sabotage the search), or any other details related to the thoroughness of the search." However, the court noted that "plaintiff's contention on this point, and the factual allegations underlying them, do not appear in the Amended Complaint. The Amended Complaint is premised only on the SSA's failure to respond to plaintiff's FOIA request. . .Plaintiff first raised the issue of inadequacy in her Opposition." The court told Taitz that "if plaintiff takes issue with the adequacy of the SSA's response, she must amend her complaint to add allegations that the SSA's response was deficient."
Opinion/Order [41]Issues: Litigation - Jurisdiction FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in Maryland has ruled that the Social Security Administration conducted an adequate search for records of Harry Bounel when it informed Orly Taitz that it could find no record for a social security number application for Bounel. Taitz, a prominent member of the birther conspiracy convinced that President Barack Obama is not actually a U.S. citizen, made a request to SSA for Social Security applications, known as SS-5s, for Bounel, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama's mother. The agency disclosed applications for Tsarnaev and Dunham, but could not find any record that Bounel had applied for a social security number. Taitz alleged that Obama is actually using Bounel's social security number. She described Bounel as an "immigrant from Russia, born in 1890, arrived in the U.S. in and around 1912, received Social Security number in the state of CT in and around March 28, 1977," included what Taitz alleged was Bounel's social security number and insisted that because of the 120-year rule the agency was required to disclose Bounel's records without proof of death. After the agency informed Taitz that it could not find any records on Bounel, she filed suit. District Court Judge Ellen Hollander ruled in favor of the agency, but allowed Taitz to amend her complaint to include a challenge to the agency's search for Bounel's records. The agency provided a detailed explanation of its search and Hollander indicated that "without question, this Declaration satisfies FOIA's requirements; it is reasonably detailed, sets forth the types and varieties of search performed, and states that all files likely to contain responsive materials were searched." Taitz argued that the agency's response to an earlier FOIA request for Bounel's records based on his alleged social security number explaining that the agency could neither confirm nor deny that there were records on Bounel under that SSN indicated that the agency indeed did have records. But Hollander pointed out that "SSA's practice of declining to confirm or deny a match when a requester provides only an SSN and a name is eminently sensible, as it prevents the inadvertent confirmation of an individual's SSN. . .Therefore, the [earlier response letter] does not cast any doubt on SSA's later statement, in response to plaintiff's more detailed FOIA request, that it was unable to locate records for Mr. Bounel." Hollander rejected Taitz's argument that the SSA database was unreliable and that the agency should have conduct a manual search. She noted that "plaintiff's unsubstantiated allegations that the Numident has been altered or is not comprehensive are insufficient to raise a material dispute about the adequacy of the agency's search." Taitz argued that because Obama had falsified a number of his identity documents the agency's search should be questioned. Hollander disagreed, noting that "these exhibits, important as they may be to plaintiff's overarching theory about President Obama, are irrelevant to the narrow question presented in this particular case�"whether SSA adequately responded to plaintiff's FOIA request for the SS-5 of Harry Bounel. In other words, irregularities in President Obama's records would not support plaintiff's claim that SSA improperly withheld Mr. Bounel's SS-5 or otherwise failed to comply with the FOIA."
Opinion/Order [44]Issues: Adequacy - Search FOIA Project Annotation: In another suit to show Obama was not a U.S. citizen, Orly Taitz asked the judge to recuse herself because for bias because she was appointed by President Obama.
Issues: Housekeeping | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|