Case Detail

FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Rudolph Contreras ruled that personally identifying information contained in several FTC complaint databases is protected by Exemption 6 (invasion of privacy) and redacting it would be too burdensome. The case before Contreras concerned a request from a coalition of public interest groups working primarily with low-income and immigrant populations for information contained in the FTC's Consumer Sentinel database, an online repository containing millions of consumer complaints about alleged illegal business activity. The databases consist of consumer complaints received by the FTC through its telephone complaint line or complaints received through the agency's website. The public interest groups apparently were interested in using the data as the basis for their own online review system that would allow consumers to see if businesses had been subject to complaints and post their own reviews of their interactions with businesses. The FTC, however, drew the line at providing any non-business-related personally identifying information and told Contreras that, unfortunately, data fields containing consumer descriptions of their complaints frequently contained personally identifying information making it essentially impossible to disclose those fields without complaint-by-complaint review, which was clearly too burdensome. Not only did the description field frequently contain personal information, complainants often provided personal information about themselves or the business in other data fields as well, making it nearly impossible to write a code that would locate and redact such information. As part of its response to the coalition's request for the data elements the agency thought could be released, the agency provided a cost estimate from its contractor of $8,581.95 "to develop the custom scripts, extract from reporting [database] format, validate and complete the FOIA request." The contractor's estimate was based on 65 hours at $132 an hour. The agency told the requesters that it would administratively close the requests if the coalition did not agree to pay within 10 days. The coalition told the agency not to commence its search and production of the data until resolution of the status of the contested data fields. Ultimately, the coalition filed suit challenging the agency's privacy claims as well as the contractor's cost estimate. To get a handle on how often personal information was included in the wrong data field, the FTC searched for Gmail addresses on the theory that they were primarily used by individuals rather than as business email addresses. Of the 350,000 complaints yielded by the search, the agency reviewed 600 complaints and found 82 percent of them contained further personally identifying information. Contreras noted that "the Court is satisfied thatâ€"based on the evidence provided by the FTC, the lack of allegations of bad faith, and the lack of contradictory evidence provided by Plaintiffâ€"the agency has demonstrated a real, and not merely speculative, possibility of personal identifying information in the form of names, addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses existing in the Company Information Fields." Contreras agreed with the agency that both consumer complainants and individuals identified in their business capacity had legitimate privacy interests. Recognizing the coalition's intent to provide the information to downstream consumers, he pointed out that "this proposed benefit demonstrates the very privacy interest at stake if personally identifying information about an accused individual wrongdoer is releasedâ€"namely that people will use this information to identify the individual and then make judgments and alter their behavior in regard to the accused based on unverified complaints held by a federal agency. This benefit, moreover, clearly is not the type recognized under FOIA Exemption 6." The coalition argued that by submitting complaints online individuals had a diminished expectation of privacy, particularly because the FTC's privacy policy indicated information could be disclosed under FOIA. But Contreras pointed out that "as the FTC explains, however, consumers are not required to click on, read, or agree to the privacy policy in order to file a complaint. In addition, individuals accused of misconduct in a complaint never see the privacy policy in the first place. Yet, even if all parties involved actually read and consented to the policy, the policy itself represents only a warning, not a waiver of FOIA privacy rights." Rejecting the coalition's claimed benefits from disclosure, Contreras observed that "those benefits do not outweigh the substantial privacy interest of protecting victims and individuals accused of wrongdoing from abuse, harassment, and embarrassment given the very real risk of their being identified and the tenuous connection between their personal information and Plaintiffs' stated policy goals." However, Contreras found the agency had not shown why five-digit zip codes should be withheld. He noted that "because the agency provides no evidence suggesting that disclosure of the five-digit zip code actually or potentially affects the likelihood that the complainant will be identified, the Court cannot conclude that such information implicates a substantial privacy interest." Turning to the question of whether the agency could be forced to redact the information so that non-exempt information could be disclosed, Contreras noted that "if Plaintiffs sought a smaller, more manageable universe of records and not the twenty million complaints in the Consumer Sentinel database, the solution might be simple: the Court could order the FTC to expend a reasonable amount of resources to identify and redact the exempt personal information from each complaint. The facts and equities of this case, however, compel the Court to conclude that the FTC properly withheld the entire universe of information given the burden of removing the subset of exempt information. . .[H]ere, because the agency aims to protect the private information of citizens by withholding the data fields at issue, and because the manual review needed for redacting such information is unreasonably burdensome, the Court concludes that the FTC properly withheld the data fields under Exemptions 6 and 7(C)." Finally, Contreras rejected the coalition's challenge to the cost estimate, finding the plaintiffs had failed to provide any evidence suggesting that the estimate was inaccurate.
Issues: Exemption 6 - Invasion of privacy

Date Filed	Doc #	Docket Text
2013-08-20	1	COMPLAINT against FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-3438716) filed by LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet, # 5 Summons US Attorney General, # 6 Summons US Attorney of DC, # 7 Summons Federal Trade Commission)(James, Joshua) (Entered: 08/20/2013)
2013-08-20		Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (sth, ) (Entered: 08/20/2013)
2013-08-20	2	ELECTRONIC SUMMONS (3) Issued as to FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons)(sth, ) (Entered: 08/20/2013)
2013-08-21	3	Corporate Disclosure Statement by AYUDA, INC.. (James, Joshua) (Entered: 08/21/2013)
2013-08-21	4	Corporate Disclosure Statement by CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC.. (James, Joshua) (Entered: 08/21/2013)
2013-09-04	5	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/27/2013. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/26/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipts)(James, Joshua) (Entered: 09/04/2013)
2013-09-04	6	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 8/26/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipts)(James, Joshua) (Entered: 09/04/2013)
2013-09-04	7	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION served on 8/23/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipts)(James, Joshua) (Entered: 09/04/2013)
2013-09-23	8	NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Lo on behalf of FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 09/23/2013)
2013-09-23	9	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 09/23/2013)
2013-09-24		MINUTE ORDER granting 9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before November 1, 2013. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 9/24/2013. (lcrc3) (Entered: 09/24/2013)
2013-10-29	10	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 10/29/2013)
2013-10-29		MINUTE ORDER granting 10 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before December 12, 2013. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 10/29/2013. (lcrc3) (Entered: 10/29/2013)
2013-12-02	11	AMENDED COMPLAINT against FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION filed by LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Amended Complaint, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C to Amended Complaint, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D to Amended Complaint, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E to Amended Complaint, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F to Amended Complaint)(James, Joshua) (Entered: 12/02/2013)
2013-12-19	12	ANSWER to 11 Amended Complaint,, by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Related document: 11 Amended Complaint,, filed by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER.(Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 12/19/2013)
2013-12-20		MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet, confer, and submit a proposed briefing schedule on or before January 6, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 12/20/2013. (lcrc3) (Entered: 12/20/2013)
2014-01-06	13	STATUS REPORT (Joint) by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 01/06/2014)
2014-01-06		MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties' 13 Joint Status Report, it is hereby ORDERED that the Government's motion for summary judgment is due on February 12, 2014; Plaintiffs' opposition and cross-motion, on March 14, 2014; the Government's reply and opposition, on April 14, 2014; and Plaintiffs' reply, on April 28, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/6/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 01/06/2014)
2014-01-08		Set Deadlines: Summary Judgment motions due by 2/12/2014 and Cross Motions due by 3/14/2014. Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 3/14/2014; Response to Cross Motions due by 4/14/2014. Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 4/28/2014. (tj ) (Entered: 01/08/2014)
2014-02-10	14	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 02/10/2014)
2014-02-11		MINUTE ORDER granting 14 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that the Government's motion for summary judgment is due on February 19, 2014; Plaintiffs' opposition and cross-motion, on March 21, 2014; the Government's reply and opposition, on April 21, 2014; and Plaintiffs' reply, on May 5, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 2/11/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 02/11/2014)
2014-02-11		Set Deadlines: Summary Judgment motions due by 2/19/2014; Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 3/21/2014; Cross Motions due by 3/21/2014; Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 4/21/2014; Response to Cross Motions due by 4/21/2014; Reply to Cross Motions due by 5/5/2014. (tj ) (Entered: 02/11/2014)
2014-02-18	15	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 02/18/2014)
2014-02-18		MINUTE ORDER granting 15 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that the Government's motion for summary judgment is due on February 21, 2014; Plaintiffs' opposition and cross-motion, on March 25, 2014; the Government's reply and opposition, on April 23, 2014; and Plaintiffs' reply, on May 7, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 2/18/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 02/18/2014)
2014-02-21	16	MOTION for Summary Judgment by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Dione Jackson Stearns, # 2 Declaration of Mary Rushen, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 02/21/2014)
2014-03-20	17	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Plaintiffs' Opposition by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER (James, Joshua) (Entered: 03/20/2014)
2014-03-20		MINUTE ORDER granting 17 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment is due April 8, 2014; the Government's reply and opposition, on May 7, 2014; and Plaintiffs' reply, on May 21, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 3/20/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 03/20/2014)
2014-04-08	18	RESPONSE to Defendant's Statement Of Material Facts Not In Genuine Dispute and Plaintiffs' Statement of Additional Undisputed Facts filed by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER. (James, Joshua) (Entered: 04/08/2014)
2014-04-08	19	Memorandum in opposition to re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Joshua James)(James, Joshua) (Entered: 04/08/2014)
2014-04-08	20	Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER (James, Joshua) (Entered: 04/08/2014)
2014-04-09		NOTICE OF ERROR re 18 Response to Document; emailed to josh.james@bryancave.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. In future, statement of facts should be attached to the opposition, not filed separately. (znmw, ) (Entered: 04/09/2014)
2014-04-30	21	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 20 Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Lo, Michelle) (Entered: 04/30/2014)
2014-04-30		MINUTE ORDER granting 21 Consent Motion for an Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall file a reply to its 16 Motion for Summary Judgment and opposition to 20 Plaintffs' Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on or before June 6, 2014. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a reply to their 20 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on or before June 20, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 04/30/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 04/30/2014)
2014-05-23	22	NOTICE of Appearance by Bradford Mann Berry on behalf of All Defendants (Berry, Bradford) (Entered: 05/23/2014)
2014-05-27	23	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 20 Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Berry, Bradford) (Entered: 05/27/2014)
2014-05-28		MINUTE ORDER granting 23 Defendant's Consent Motion for an Extension of Time to File Opposition/Reply. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's reply to Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment and Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment shall be filed on or before July 3, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 05/28/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 05/28/2014)
2014-06-23	24	NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL by John G. Interrante on behalf of FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Substituting for attorney Bradford Mann Berry (Interrante, John) (Entered: 06/23/2014)
2014-07-03	25	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 20 Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 07/03/2014)
2014-07-07		MINUTE ORDER granting 25 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall file its reply and opposition to Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment on or before July 17, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 07/07/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 07/07/2014)
2014-07-07		Set/Reset Deadlines: Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Cross Motion due by 7/17/2014. (gdf) (Entered: 07/07/2014)
2014-07-17	26	REPLY to opposition to motion re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 20 Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Dione J. Stearns (Second), # 2 Exhibit Stearns Exs A and B, # 3 Exhibit Stearns Exs C and D, # 4 Declaration Maria Tribble, # 5 Statement of Facts Response to Pls.' Statement in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 07/17/2014)
2014-07-17	27	Memorandum in opposition to re 20 Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment (See ECF No. 26) filed by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Interrante, John) Modified event title on 7/18/2014 (znmw, ). (Entered: 07/17/2014)
2014-07-31	28	REPLY to opposition to motion re 20 Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER. (James, Joshua) Modified on 8/1/2014 to correct linkage (rdj). (Entered: 07/31/2014)
2014-08-07	29	NOTICE of Submission of Exhibits C and D (Excel Spreadsheets) to Chambers by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION re 26 Reply to opposition to Motion, 27 Reply to opposition to Motion (Interrante, John) (Entered: 08/07/2014)
2014-09-30	30	ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Defendant's motion for summary judgment and denying 20 Plaintiffs' cross-motion for partial summary judgment. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 09/30/2014. (lcrc1) (Entered: 09/30/2014)
2014-09-30	31	MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 16 Defendant's motion for summary judgment and denying 20 Plaintiffs' cross-motion for partial summary judgment. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 09/30/2014. (lcrc1) (Entered: 09/30/2014)
2014-10-07		MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and submit a proposed order to govern further proceedings in this case moving forward on or before October 22, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 10/07/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 10/07/2014)
2014-10-10		Set Deadlines: Meet & Confer Statement due by 10/22/2014. (tj ) (Entered: 10/10/2014)
2014-10-22	32	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Proposed Order by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
2014-10-22		MINUTE ORDER granting 32 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit their proposed order to govern further proceedings in this case on or before November 5, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 10/22/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
2014-11-05	33	STATUS REPORT (Joint) by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Interrante, John) (Entered: 11/05/2014)
2014-11-06		MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 33 the parties' joint status report, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint status report on or before December 8, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 11/06/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 11/06/2014)
2014-11-06		Set Deadlines: Status Report due by 12/8/2014 (tj) (Entered: 11/06/2014)
2014-12-08	34	STATUS REPORT (Joint) by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Interrante, John) (Entered: 12/08/2014)
2014-12-08		MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 34 the parties' joint status report, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint status report on or before February 6, 2015. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 12/8/2014. (lcrc3) (Entered: 12/08/2014)
2015-02-06	35	STATUS REPORT (Joint) by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Interrante, John) (Entered: 02/06/2015)
2015-02-09		MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties' 35 Joint Status Report, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit an updated Joint Status Report on or before March 9, 2015. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 02/09/2015. (lcrc3) (Entered: 02/09/2015)
2015-03-09	36	STATUS REPORT (Joint) by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Interrante, John) (Entered: 03/09/2015)
2015-03-10	37	ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 03/10/2015. (lcrc3) (Entered: 03/10/2015)
2015-05-11	38	STATUS REPORT Joint by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER. (James, Joshua) (Entered: 05/11/2015)
2015-05-12		MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 38 the parties' Joint Status Report, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit an updated Joint Status Report on or before June 11, 2015. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 05/12/2015. (lcrc2) (Entered: 05/12/2015)
2015-05-12		Set/Reset Deadlines: Status Report due by 6/11/2015 (tj) (Entered: 05/12/2015)
2015-06-11	39	STATUS REPORT by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER. (James, Joshua) (Entered: 06/11/2015)
2015-06-12		MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 39 the parties' Joint Status Report, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit another joint status report on or before July 10, 2015. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 06/12/2015. (lcrc3) (Entered: 06/12/2015)
2015-07-10	40	STATUS REPORT by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER. (James, Joshua) (Entered: 07/10/2015)
2015-07-10		MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 40 the parties' Joint Status Report, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit another joint status report on or before August 11, 2015. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 07/10/2015. (lcrc3) (Entered: 07/10/2015)
2015-08-11	41	STATUS REPORT by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER. (James, Joshua) (Entered: 08/11/2015)
2015-08-12		MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 41 the parties' joint status report, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a status hearing before the Court on September 11, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 14. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 08/12/2015. (lcrc3) (Entered: 08/12/2015)
2015-08-25		Set/Reset Hearings: Status Conference set for 9/11/2015 @ 10:00 AM in Courtroom 14 before Judge Rudolph Contreras. (tj) (Entered: 08/25/2015)
2015-09-10	42	STIPULATION of Dismissal by AYUDA, INC., CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON DC, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER. (James, Joshua) (Entered: 09/10/2015)
Hide Docket Events