Case Detail
Case Title | Rosiere v. USA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Colorado | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Denver | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2016cv00143 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2016-01-19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2016-03-16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Lewis T. Babcock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | Shaun Rosiere | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | Shaun Rosiere submitted a number of FOIA requests to the Department of Justice for records concerning his criminal case. He apparently did not hear from the agency on any of his requests. He then filed suit. Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | USA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Opinion/Order [11] FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in Colorado has dismissed Shaun Rosiere's FOIA suit because it identical to ones who filed in the District of New Jersey and the District of Nevada. In dismissing the case, the court noted that "Mr. Rosiere's claims in this action are duplicative of his claims in the other pending actions. Although the FOIA requests at issue were dated two days apart from the other cases, the requests in all other respects are identical. The requested relief of obtaining the relevant documents is identical to the other cases. Therefore, the claims, parties, and relief being sought do not differ significantly between the two actions and Mr. Rosiere may not pursue the same claims simultaneously in multiple cases. To allow otherwise would permit a party to file an unlimited number of identical FOIA requests on separate days and then file an unlimited number of federal lawsuits regarding the requests. Such an abuse of the federal system is not allowed."
Issues: Litigation - Jurisdiction - Failure to Exhaust | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|