Case Detail
Case Title | ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Columbia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Washington, DC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2017cv00121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2017-01-18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2018-05-22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Trevor N. McFadden | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | The Electronic Privacy Information Center submitted a FOIA request to the FBI for records concerning the agency's response to Russian interference in the 2016 election. EPIC also requested news media fee status and expedited processing. The agency acknowledged receipt of the request, but after hearing nothing further from the agency, EPIC filed suit. Complaint issues: Fee Category - Media or Educational, Failure to respond within statutory time limit, Litigation - Attorney's fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Complaint attachment 3 Complaint attachment 4 Opinion/Order [31] FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Trevor McFadden has ruled that the FBI did not improperly narrow EPIC's request for records concerning cyber-attacks by Russia during the 2016 election and that the agency properly withheld records under Exemption 7(A) (interference with ongoing investigation or proceeding), Exemption 1 (national security), and Exemption 3 (other statutes). EPIC submitted a four-part FOIA request, two parts of which focused specifically on Russian attempts to hack the Republican National Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Another part asked more broadly for records regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election. EPIC argued the agency had improperly narrowed its request by searching only its records concerning its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. McFadden disagreed, noting that "EPIC misunderstands the FBI's statement that it construed the universe of responsive records as co-extensive with the Russian investigation files. In context, this statement shows that the FBI assumed EPIC would be interested in every record in those files, not that the FBI assumed EPIC would be uninterested in records stored elsewhere. The FBI limited its search to the Russian investigation files not because it believed EPIC had asked for this limitation but because it determined, based on consultation with subject-matter experts, that this is where the FBI would store responsive records. This decision falls within the scope of the FBI's discretion and expertise in crafting a reasonable search and does not make the search inadequate. Nor do EPIC's speculations about the existence of other files containing responsive communications or records related to the FBI's public reports alter this analysis." EPIC accused the FBI of making a blanket exemption claim under Exemption 7(A) for records pertaining to the Russian investigation. McFadden, however, pointed out that "contrary to EPIC's characterization, the FBI has not claimed a blanket exemption for all documents in the Russia investigation files. Instead, it has claimed three categorical exemptions for specific types of information in those files. And my review of both the public and in camera portions of [the agency's] declaration satisfy me that Exemption 7(A) applies to each category." He observed that "the FBI evaluated whether it could produce any records given the reports, indictments, and plea agreements on which EPIC relies, but found that this public information does not match the information withheld at the same level of specificity." EPIC also questioned the propriety of the Exemption 1 claims. McFadden indicated that the FBI's affidavit "goes on to explain that the FBI's redactions prevent the disclosure of 'how the FBI conducts surveillance under the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act], handles FISA-derived information, and otherwise implements and utilizes the technique.' This explanation provides a more specific explanation of why releasing the redacted information would undermine an important method and jeopardize national security. Providing more information would jeopardize the purpose of Exemption 1." EPIC found it "highly implausible" that all of four pages redacted under Exemption 3 contained information protected by the National Security Act. McFadden observed that "the FBI has specified the reasons for its redactions in as much detail as possible on the public record and has accounted for the disclosure of other FISA procedures by explaining that the redacted information 'does not match or mirror any information previously made public by the FBI through an official disclosure.'"
Issues: Adequacy - Search, Exemption 7(A) - Categorical exemption | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|