Case Detail
Case Title | Kuntz v. U.S. Department of Justice | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of North Dakota | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Western | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2017cv00223 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2017-10-17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2018-07-11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | Riley S. Kuntz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | Riley Kuntz submitted a FOIA request to the FBI for records concerning authorization for the agency to search for records on any North Dakota Driver License or non-license picture upon request by any agency. The agency acknowledged receipt of the request and told Kuntz that it could find no records. Kuntz filed an administrative appeal, which was denied. He then filed suit. Complaint issues: Litigation - Attorney's fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | U.S. Department of Justice | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Opinion/Order [16] FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in North Dakota has ruled that Riley Kuntz's FOIA litigation is moot because he had already received a copy of a Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of Justice and the State of North Dakota from the state before requesting it from the agency. But the court rejected DOJ's alternate argument that the MOU was already publicly available on the Internet. Rejecting that claim, the court noted that "there is no indication that Kuntz knew for sure there was an agreement at the time he made his request, much less that he knew its name so that he could have conducted the precise internet search DOJ now suggests could have been conducted."
Issues: Litigation - Jurisdiction - Moot | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|