Date Filed | Doc # | Docket Text |
|
2019-11-04 | 1 | COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Rashid El Malik against Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (Filing fee $ 400) Jury Demand. (Attachments: # 1 CV71) (jtil) (Entered: 11/07/2019) |
2019-11-04 | 2 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) (Entered: 11/07/2019) |
2019-11-04 | 3 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) (Entered: 11/07/2019) |
2019-11-04 | 4 | 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), 1 as to Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. (jtil) (Entered: 11/07/2019) |
2019-11-07 | 5 | STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji) (Entered: 11/07/2019) |
2019-11-07 | 6 | SEALED - MOTION TO PROCEED TO FILE APPLICATION WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COURT COST filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik. (bm) (Entered: 11/12/2019) |
2019-11-13 | 7 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Motion [Docket 6] by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Accordingly, the Motion is DENIED. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 11/20/2019) |
2019-12-09 | 8 | PLAINTIFF RASHID EL MALIK REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OR THINGS filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik. (bm) (Entered: 12/16/2019) |
2019-12-12 | 9 | APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik. (bm) (Entered: 12/17/2019) |
2019-12-19 | 10 | EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 3/3/2020 re Complaint - (Discovery), 1 filed by Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Margaret M. Chen, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Margaret Ming Chen added to party Department of Veteran Affairs(pty:dft)) (Chen, Margaret) (Entered: 12/19/2019) |
2019-12-19 | 11 | Proof of Service by Mailing filed by Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 3/3/2020 re Complaint - (Discovery), 1 10 (Chen, Margaret) (Entered: 12/19/2019) |
2019-12-20 | 12 | NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service by Mailing 11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Subsequent Document Filings-Proof of Service (subsequent documents). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) (Entered: 12/20/2019) |
2019-12-20 | 13 | ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granting 10 EX PARTE APPLICATION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint is extended up to and including March 3, 2020. (bm) (Entered: 12/23/2019) |
2019-12-27 | 14 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik. Motion set for hearing on 2/24/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (bm) (Entered: 12/30/2019) |
2019-12-27 | 15 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION BY PLAINTIFF TO ADD DEFENDANTS re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 14 filed by Plaintiff Rashid El Malik. (bm) (Entered: 12/30/2019) |
2019-12-27 | 16 | ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Denying 9 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. (bm) (Entered: 01/02/2020) |
2020-01-06 | 17 | ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: the documents listed below were improperly filed for the following reasons: Under Local Rule 26-2, discovery requests are not to be filed unless and until they are in issue in connection with a pending motion, trial, or other matter requiring court resolution; therefore, the following document(s) shall be stricken from the record and shall not be considered by the Court: Request for Production of Documents 8 . (efc) (Entered: 01/06/2020) |
2020-02-03 | 18 | STATEMENT of of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint and Request Regarding Response Deadline NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to 14 filed by Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Chen, Margaret) (Entered: 02/03/2020) |
2020-02-10 | 19 | MINUTES (In Chambers): The Court GRANTS the motion for leave by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granting 14 MOTION to Amend/Correct: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to amend. The Court also GRANTS Defendant's request that its deadline to respond to the first amended complaint be the later of the current filing deadline, March 3, 2020, or twenty-one days after the actual filing of the first amended complaint. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 02/10/2020) |
2020-03-10 | 20 | REQUEST for Default Judgment against Defendant Department of Veterans Affairs filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik. Request set for hearing on 5/11/2020 at 1:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (bm) (Entered: 03/10/2020) |
2020-03-11 | 21 | Opposition to Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default Judgment In Opposition to re: REQUEST for Default Judgment against Defendant Department of Veterans Affairs 20 filed by Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Margaret M. Chen, # 2 Proof of Service)(Chen, Margaret) (Entered: 03/11/2020) |
2020-04-06 | 22 | RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANT OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Rashid El Malik (bm) (Entered: 04/10/2020) |
2020-04-09 | 23 | WITHDRAWAL OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT 20 filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik. (bm) (Entered: 04/14/2020) |
2020-04-09 | 24 | FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Department of Veteran Affairs, Woodrow Anthony Roeback, Laura Georgi, Michael D Lyon, Christopher Murray; Party DOES (1-5) terminated amending Complaint 1 , filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik (bm) (Entered: 04/14/2020) |
2020-04-22 | 25 | STIPULATION for Order Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Margaret M. Chen, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Proof of Service by Mailing)(Chen, Margaret) (Entered: 04/22/2020) |
2020-04-22 | 26 | ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT granting Stipulation 25 , by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Pursuant to the Stipulation filed by the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Defendant to respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended up to and including May 15, 2020. (bm) (Entered: 04/22/2020) |
2020-04-29 | 27 | PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Department of Veteran Affairs, upon Civil Process Clerk, Department of Veterans Affair, Office of the United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA 90012, re First Amended Complaint 24 served on 4/27/20. (bm) (Entered: 05/07/2020) |
2020-05-04 | 28 | PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik, upon Civil Process Clerk, Department of Veterans Affair, Civil Process Clerk, Office of the United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA 90012, re Amended Complaint 24 served on 5/2/20. (bm) (Entered: 05/07/2020) |
2020-05-15 | 29 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case (First Amended Complaint); Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. Motion set for hearing on 7/13/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proof of Service by Mailing) (Chen, Margaret) (Entered: 05/15/2020) |
2020-05-21 | 30 | RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO DISMISS 29 filed by Plaintiff Rashid El Malik. (bm) (Entered: 05/26/2020) |
2020-06-29 | 31 | REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case (First Amended Complaint); Memorandum of Points and Authorities 29 filed by Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Chen, Margaret) (Entered: 06/29/2020) |
2020-07-08 | 32 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss the FAC in its entirety 29 . The Court DISMISSES the claims for lack of jurisdiction and without prejudice. This order closes the case. See document for details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (smo) (Entered: 07/08/2020) |
Hide Docket Events |