Case Detail
Case Title | Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Columbia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Washington, DC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2020cv00076 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2020-01-13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2020-04-10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Trevor N. McFadden | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | SATTERFIELD & PONTIKES CONSTRUCTION, INC. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | Satterfield & Pontikes Construction submitted two FOIA requests to the Department of the Navy for records concerning construction at the Navy facility in Gulfport, MS, particularly records submitted by Whiting Turner Contracting Company. The agency acknowledged receipt of the requests and told Satterfield & Pontikes that the cost of providing the records would be $2,724. Satterfield & Pontikes agreed to pay the fees but after hearing nothing further from the agency, Satterfield & Pontikes filed suit. Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit, Litigation - Attorney's fees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Complaint attachment 3 Complaint attachment 4 Complaint attachment 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|