Case Detail
Case Title | Council on American Islamic Relations - Washington v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | Western District of Washington | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Seattle | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 2:2020cv00217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2020-02-12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2021-05-04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Ricardo S. Martinez | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | Council on American-Islamic Relations-Washington | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | The Council on American-Islamic Relations - Washington submitted a FOIA request to U.S. Customs and Border Protection for records concerning changes in the policies for screening individuals entering the United States in the Washington area. The agency acknowledged receipt of the request but after hearing nothing further from the agency, CAIR - Washington filed suit. Complaint issues: Litigation - Attorney's fees, Failure to respond within statutory time limit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | United States Customs and Border Protection | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | United States Department of Homeland Security | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Complaint attachment 3 Complaint attachment 4 Opinion/Order [9] Opinion/Order [14] Opinion/Order [19] Opinion/Order [29] Opinion/Order [32] FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in Washington has ruled that U.S. Customs and Border Protection did not conduct an adequate search in response to a FOIA request from the Council on American-Islamic Relations-Washington for records concerning the Seattle Field Office or Blaine Sector's enhanced vetting of individuals of Iranian heritage. The court also found the agency had failed to justify exemption claims made under Exemption 5 (privileges), Exemption 6 (invasion of privacy), Exemption 7(C) (invasion of privacy concerning law enforcement records), and Exemption 7(E) (investigative methods or techniques). The agency ultimately disclosed 147 pages with redactions. CAIR challenged the adequacy of the agency's search, arguing that the agency only searched the emails of three mid-level managers and failed to search the email account of Adele Fasano, who had been the SFO Director at the time. Although the agency agreed to search Fasano's email account, Judge Richard Martinez found the agency's search was so far insufficient. Martinez rejected the agency's deliberative process privilege claim, pointing out that "Defendants have failed to meet their burden to demonstrate Exemption 5 applies to these documents, which do not appear to have been prepared in order to assist in the making of a decision, and instead relate to the release of a public-facing statement describing events after a decision was made." As to Exemption 6, Martinez indicated that the agency had improperly "redacted the names of government officials in records not relating to those individuals. These are not personnel records or similar files." He observed that "CAIR has also demonstrated that the public interest lies in the release of the names of Assistant Directors and Port Directors playing a key role in the implementation of the policy at issue, which touches on the civil rights of U.S. Citizens and legal permanent residents." Martinez pointed out that the public interest in disclosure made Exemption 7(C) inapplicable as well. He ordered the agency to provide the directive implementing the policy for in camera review to assess whether it was protected under Exemption 7(E). Martinez noted that "release of the directive that mandated the detention of individuals based on national origin may be appropriate, along with the release of any communications discussing, implementing, criticizing or withdrawing that directive."
Opinion/Order [34]Issues: Exemption 7(E) - Investigative methods or techniques, Exemption 5 - Privileges - Deliberative process privilege - Deliberative | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
015 Amended Complaint 016 Maltese Declaration 016-1 Exhbt A to Maltese Decl 016-2 Exhbt B to Maltese Decl 016-3 Exhbt C to Maltese Decl 016-4 Exhbt D to Maltese Decl 016-5 Exhbt E to Maltese Decl 016-6 Exhbt F to Maltese Decl 016-7 Exhbt G to Maltese Decl 020 Defendant MSJ 021 Howard "Search" Decl ISO Def MSJ 021-1 Exhbt 1 to Howard "Search" Decl 022 Howard "Exempt" Decl ISO Def MSJ 022-1 Exhbt 1 to Howard "Exempt" Decl 022-2 Exhbt 2 to Howard "Exempt" Decl 022-3 Exhbt 3 to Howard "Exempt" Decl 022-4 Exhbt 4 to Howard Exempt Decl 023 Plaintiff x-MSJ 024 Maltese Decl ISO x-MSJ 024-1 Exhbt A to Maltese Decl 024-10 Exhbt J to Maltese Decl 024-11 Exhbt K to Maltese Decl 024-2 Exhbt B to Maltese Decl 024-3 Exhbt C to Maltese Decl 024-4 Exhbt D to Maltese Decl 024-5 Exhbt E to Maltese Decl 024-6 Exhbt F to Maltese Decl 024-7 Exhbt G to Maltese Decl 024-8 Exhbt H to Maltese Decl 024-9 Exhbt I to Maltese Decl 025 Def Response, Reply to x-MSJ 026 Howard Third Decl 027 Reply to Response to x-MSJ 028 Maltese Third Decl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|