Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleSTONEHILL v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
DistrictDistrict of Columbia
CityWashington, DC
Case Number1:2022cv03391
Date Filed2022-11-04
Date ClosedOpen
JudgeJudge Carl J. Nichols
PlaintiffPAULINE DALE STONEHILL Co-Executor and Co-Special Administrator
TERMINATED: 09/25/2024
Case DescriptionPauline Dale Stonehill submitted two FOIA request to the National Archives and Records Administration for records concerning 86 boxes related to the estate of Harry Stonehill. The agency acknowledged receipt of the requests but after hearing nothing further from the agency, Stonehill filed suit.
Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit, Adequacy - Search, Litigation - Vaughn index, Litigation - Attorney's fees

Defendant2255
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
DefendantNATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
DefendantNATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
TERMINATED: 09/25/2024
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
Complaint attachment 2
Complaint attachment 3
Complaint attachment 4
Complaint attachment 5
Complaint attachment 6
Complaint attachment 7
Complaint attachment 8
Complaint attachment 9
Complaint attachment 10
Complaint attachment 11
Complaint attachment 12
Complaint attachment 13
Complaint attachment 14
Complaint attachment 15
Complaint attachment 16
Opinion/Order [47]
FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Carl Nichols has ruled that Patrick Lenz may be substituted for Pauline Stonehill to allow FOIA litigation originally commenced by Stonehill's husband, Harry Stonehill to continue. Stonehill was an American expatriate with extensive business dealings with the Philippines. He was subject to extensive tax proceedings brought by the IRS and the Department of Justice in the 1960-70s. Pauline Stonehill was co-executor of Harry Stonehill's estate after he died. In the case before Nichols, Pauline Stonehill had requested records from the National Archives and Records Administration for records transferred to NARA by the IRS and DOJ after the tax case against Stonehill was completed. The three requests concerned whether NARA had adequately searched for records. Before the motions for summary judgement were completed, Pauline Stonehill died. Her counsel moved to substitute Patrick Lenz, the only surviving co-executor of Pauline Stonehill's estate, as the plaintiff. NARA opposed the motion. Lenz argued that NARA's search was inadequate because it did not account for the shipping labels for the boxes sent to NARA. Nichols agreed with NARA that the agency did not have sufficient control over the shipping labels to constitute agency records, citing Burka v. Dept of HHS, 87 F.3d 508 (D.C. Cir. 1996), which provided a four-factor test for assessing whether an agency had the requisite control over records. Here, Nichols agreed that the shipping labels had not remained in NARA's control and thus were not its records. Nichols also found that Lenz could be substituted in place of Pauline Stonehill.
Issues: Adequacy - Search, Litigation - Jurisdiction - Proper Party
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2022-11-041COMPLAINT PAULINE DALE STONEHILL against NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons NARA, # 3 Summons Attorney General, # 4 Summons Civil Process Clerk, # 5 Exhibit Documents re July 10, 1998 FOIA, # 6 Exhibit January 10, 1962 Chandler memo, # 7 Exhibit Tax Division access to Criminal Division files, # 8 Exhibit March 15, 2001 FOIA, # 9 Exhibit Discovery 8 IRS boxes, # 10 Exhibit Discovery of 86 IRS boxes, # 11 Exhibit Stonehill Estate, # 12 Exhibit July 10, 2014 FOIA, # 13 Exhibit Lost IRS boxes, # 14 Exhibit September 28, 2018 FOIA, # 15 Exhibit August 15, 2022 NARA FOIA, # 16 Exhibit Criminal Division FOIA)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 11/04/2022)
2022-11-07Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zljn) (Entered: 11/07/2022)
2022-11-072SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) (Entered: 11/07/2022)
2022-11-07Payment for 1 Complaint,,,. ($402; Receipt number ADCDC-9654051). (Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 11/07/2022)
2022-11-093STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on November 9, 2022. (lccjn1) (Entered: 11/09/2022)
2022-11-104ENTERED IN ERROR.....RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. PAULINE DALE STONEHILL served on 11/10/2022 (Heggestad, Robert); Modified on 11/14/2022 (ztth). (Entered: 11/10/2022)
2022-11-105RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/10/22. (Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 11/10/2022)
2022-11-106ENTERED IN ERROR.....RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. PAULINE DALE STONEHILL served on 11/9/2022 (Heggestad, Robert) Modified on 11/14/2022 (ztth). (Entered: 11/10/2022)
2022-11-107RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION served on 11/9/2022 (Heggestad, Robert) Modified on 11/15/2022 to add party and date served (zjm). (Entered: 11/10/2022)
2022-12-088Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Escher, Sam) (Entered: 12/08/2022)
2022-12-08MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the 8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by February 10, 2023. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on December 8, 2022. (lccjn1) (Entered: 12/08/2022)
2023-02-099ANSWER to Complaint by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION.(Escher, Sam) (Entered: 02/09/2023)
2023-02-21MINUTE ORDER. Before the Court in this Freedom of Information Act case are a Complaint and an Answer. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.3, the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) are inapplicable. It is hereby ORDERED that the Parties shall confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before March 24, 2023. The Joint Status Report shall address: (1) the status of Plaintiff's FOIA request; (2) the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA request; (3) the anticipated dates for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff; (4) whether a motion for stay is likely under Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force , 547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976); (5) the possibility of prioritizing documents responsive to Plaintiff's request and any discussions regarding whether Plaintiff's request can be narrowed; and (6) whether the Parties anticipate summary judgment briefing and, if so, a proposed briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on February 21, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 02/21/2023)
2023-03-1310Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint,,, by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order ORDER)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 03/13/2023)
2023-03-15MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of Plaintiff's 10 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint by March 20, 2023. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on March 15, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 03/15/2023)
2023-03-1611AMENDED COMPLAINT STONEHILL v. NARA against PAULINE DALE STONEHILL filed by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit List, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit 13)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 03/16/2023)
2023-03-2312WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO MINUTE ORDER FILED ON 4/5/2023.....MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint Out of Time by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit First Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit List, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5, # 8 Exhibit 6, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 8, # 11 Exhibit 9, # 12 Exhibit 10, # 13 Exhibit 11, # 14 Exhibit 12, # 15 Exhibit 13, # 16 Text of Proposed Order Text of Proposed Order)(Heggestad, Robert). (Entered: 03/23/2023)
2023-03-2413MOTION to Withdraw re 12 MOTION for Leave to File Motion to File Amended Complaint out of Time by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order ORDER)(Heggestad, Robert) Modified docket relationship on 3/29/2023 (zed). (Entered: 03/24/2023)
2023-03-3014ANSWER to Complaint (Amended Complaint) (ECF No. 11) by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION.(Escher, Sam) (Entered: 03/30/2023)
2023-04-05MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of Plaintiff's 13 Motion to Withdraw the Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint out of Time, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the 12 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint out of Time is WITHDRAWN. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on April 5, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 04/05/2023)
2023-04-05MINUTE ORDER. Before the Court in this Freedom of Information Act case are an Amended Complaint and an Answer. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.3, the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) are inapplicable. It is hereby ORDERED that the Parties shall confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before May 8, 2023. The Joint Status Report shall address: (1) the status of Plaintiff's FOIA request; (2) the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA request; (3) the anticipated dates for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff; (4) whether a motion for stay is likely under Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force , 547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976); (5) the possibility of prioritizing documents responsive to Plaintiff's request and any discussions regarding whether Plaintiff's request can be narrowed; and (6) whether the Parties anticipate summary judgment briefing and, if so, a proposed briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on April 5, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 04/05/2023)
2023-05-0815STATUS REPORT by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: # 1 Ex. A - Email Correspondence)(Escher, Sam) (Entered: 05/08/2023)
2023-05-0816RESPONSE re 15 STATUS REPORT to NARA JSR filed by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit April 6, 2023 email from R. Heggestad to S. Escher, # 2 Exhibit NARA excel sheets re Criminal Division OF-11's, # 3 Exhibit NARA excel sheets re Tax Division OF-11's, # 4 Exhibit April 26, 2023 letter from R. Heggestad to S. Escher, # 5 Exhibit April 17, 2023 email from R. Heggestad to S. Escher, # 6 Exhibit April 23, 2023 email from R. Heggestad to S. Escher)(Heggestad, Robert) Modified docket event/text on 5/16/2023 (zed). (Entered: 05/08/2023)
2023-05-0817SUPPLEMENT re 16 RESPONSE Exhibit 7 Response to JSR filed by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit April 23, 2023 email from R. Heggestad)(Heggestad, Robert) Modified docket event/text and docket relationship on 5/16/2023 (zed). (Entered: 05/08/2023)
2023-05-0918ERRATA Opposition to Defendants Request for Extension to file joint status report by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Errata Attachment A List of Exhibits)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 05/09/2023)
2023-05-12MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of Defendant's 15 Status Report and Plaintiff's 16 Response, it is ORDERED that the Parties shall meet and confer and jointly file a status report, as required by the Court's April 5, 2023 Minute Order, on or before May 26, 2023. The Joint Status Report should address all matters listed in the April 5, 2023 Minute Order. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on May 12, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 05/12/2023)
2023-05-2419Joint STATUS REPORT by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Escher, Sam) (Entered: 05/24/2023)
2023-05-31MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the 19 Joint Status Report, it is ORDERED that the Parties shall file, by June 28, 2023, an additional joint status report, addressing any pertinent issues referenced in the 19 Joint Status Report. It is further ORDERED that, absent further order of the Court to the contrary, Defendant shall file its motion for summary judgment and Vaughn index by July 28, 2023; Plaintiff shall file her opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment by August 28, 2023; Defendant shall file its opposition to Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment and its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment by September 18, 2023; and Plaintiff shall file her reply in support of her cross-motion for summary judgment by September 28, 2023. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on May 31, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 05/31/2023)
2023-06-01Set/Reset Deadlines: Vaughn Index due by 7/28/2023. (mac) (Entered: 06/01/2023)
2023-06-2820Joint STATUS REPORT by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Escher, Sam) (Entered: 06/28/2023)
2023-07-10MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the 20 Joint Status Report, it is ORDERED that Defendant shall file its motion for summary judgment and Vaughn index by August 17, 2023; Plaintiff shall file her opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment by September 14, 2023; Defendant shall file its opposition to Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment and its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment by October 5, 2023; and Plaintiff shall file her reply in support of her cross-motion for summary judgment by October 26, 2023. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on July 10, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 07/10/2023)
2023-08-1721MOTION for Summary Judgment by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Declaration of Joseph Scanlon, # 3 Exhibits A-S to Declaration, # 4 Sixth FOIA Request, # 5 Text of Proposed Order)(Escher, Sam) (Entered: 08/17/2023)
2023-09-1322Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to file Opposition to Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion and Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 09/13/2023)
2023-09-13MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the 22 Motion for Extension of Time, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is granted. Plaintiff shall file her opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment by September 19, 2023; Defendant shall file its opposition to Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment and its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment by October 10, 2023; and Plaintiff shall file her reply in support of her cross-motion for summary judgment by October 31, 2023. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on September 13, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 09/13/2023)
2023-09-13Set/Reset Deadlines: Cross Motions due by 9/19/2023. Response to Cross Motions due by 10/10/2023. Reply to Cross Motions due by 10/31/2023. Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 9/19/2023. Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 10/10/2023. (zcam) (Entered: 09/14/2023)
2023-09-1923RESPONSE re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment filed by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Statement of Material Facts not in Genuine Dispute)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 09/19/2023)
2023-09-1924Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (See Docket Entry 23 to view document. (mg) Modified docket text on 9/20/2023 (mg). (Entered: 09/20/2023)
2023-09-20NOTICE OF ERROR re 23 Response to motion; emailed to robert@reheggestad.com, cc'd 4 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Please note the following for future filings; do not refile document , 2. Please note the correct case number is 22-cv-03391 for future filings. (Grady, Michele) (Entered: 09/20/2023)
2023-09-2125NOTICE of Errata re 23 and 24 by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL (Attachments: # 1 Errata Attachment A Corrected Copy of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment, # 2 Errata Attachment B Corrected copy of Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts not in Genuine Dispute, # 3 Exhibit 1 NARA Records, # 4 Exhibit 2 January 10, 1962 Memo from R. Chandler, # 5 Exhibit 3 NARA emails, # 6 Exhibit 7 May 20, 1966 Memorandum from L. Uretz to M. Rogovin, # 7 Exhibit 8 Documents Related to Lost IRS boxes)(Heggestad, Robert) Modified docket text on 9/21/2023 (mg). (Entered: 09/21/2023)
2023-09-2826MOTION to Amend/Correct Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts not in Genuine Dispute by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement, # 2 Exhibit Nara Records, # 3 Exhibit January 10, 1962 Memorandum, # 4 Exhibit NARA emails, # 5 Exhibit May 20. 1966 Memorandum, # 6 Exhibit Documents Relate to Lost Boxes, # 7 Supplement Attachment A Highlighted Additions, # 8 Supplement Statement of Material Facts not in Genuine Dispute, # 9 Text of Proposed Order)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 09/28/2023)
2023-10-0327Joint MOTION to Modify Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Escher, Sam) (Entered: 10/03/2023)
2023-10-03MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of 26 Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement and 27 the Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, it is hereby ORDERED that both Motions are GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall refile her updated opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment and her cross-motion for summary judgment. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall file its opposition to Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment and its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment by November 2, 2023. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her reply in support of her cross-motion for summary judgment by November 22, 2023. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on October 3, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 10/03/2023)
2023-11-0228REPLY to opposition to motion re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: # 1 Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Facts, # 2 Second Scanlon Declaration, # 3 7th FOIA Request, # 4 8th FOIA Request, # 5 Emails Between the Parties)(Escher, Sam) (Entered: 11/02/2023)
2023-11-0229Memorandum in opposition to re 24 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Escher, Sam) (Entered: 11/02/2023)
2023-11-0330MOTION to Substitute Party by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Statement of Death, # 2 Exhibit Death Certificate, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 11/03/2023)
2023-11-0731Memorandum in opposition to re 30 Motion to Substitute Party filed by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Escher, Sam) (Entered: 11/07/2023)
2023-11-0732MOTION to Withdraw Motion to Substitute Parties by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 11/07/2023)
2023-11-13MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the 32 Motion to Withdraw, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the 30 Motion to Substitute is WITHDRAWN. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on November 13, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 11/13/2023)
2023-11-1633MOTION to Substitute Party by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Nov. 3 Motion to Substitute, # 2 Exhibit Statement of Death, # 3 Exhibit Death Certificate, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 11/16/2023)
2023-11-1734RESPONSE TO ORDER OF THE COURT re Order on Motion to Amend/Correct,,, Order on Motion to Modify,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, Notice of Filing filed by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross Motioin for Summary Judgment, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 NARA REcords, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 Jan. 10, 1962 Memo, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 NARA IRS Emails, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 7 May 20, 1966 Memo, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 8 Documents Related to Lost IRS Boxes, # 7 Supplement Statement of Material Facts not in Genuine Dispute, # 8 Text of Proposed Order)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 11/17/2023)
2023-11-2135ENTERED IN ERROR.....REPLY to opposition to motion re 24 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 11/21/23 email from NARA General Counsel to R. Heggestad)(Heggestad, Robert); Modified on 11/22/2023 (ztth). (Entered: 11/21/2023)
2023-11-22NOTICE OF ERROR regarding 35 Reply to opposition to Motion. The following error(s) need correction: Incorrect court case number. Please refile. (ztth) (Entered: 11/22/2023)
2023-11-2236ERRATA to Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 11/22/2023)
2023-11-2237REPLY to opposition to motion re 24 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit September 22, 2023 email from NARA General Counsel to R. Heggestad)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 11/22/2023)
2023-11-2838Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 33 MOTION to Substitute Party by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Escher, Sam) (Entered: 11/28/2023)
2023-11-28MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of 38 the Government's Motion for Extension of Time, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Government shall file its response on or before December 7, 2023. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on November 28, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 11/28/2023)
2023-12-0739Memorandum in opposition to re 33 Motion to Substitute Party filed by NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Escher, Sam) (Entered: 12/07/2023)
2023-12-0840MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Substitution of Parties o by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 12/08/2023)
2023-12-11MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the 40 Motion for Extension of Time, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Attorney Heggestad may file a reply on or before December 18, 2023. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on December 11, 2023. (lccjn1) (Entered: 12/11/2023)
2023-12-1841REPLY to opposition to motion re 33 MOTION to Substitute Party filed by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit October 15, 2018 letter from Dr. P. Lenz to R. Heggestad)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 12/18/2023)
2023-12-2942NOTICE of Supplemental Filing by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL (Attachments: # 1 December 28, 2023 Letter from P. Lenz to R. Heggestad, # 2 December 28, 2023 Letter from C. Dale to R. Heggestad)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 12/29/2023)
2024-01-0343NOTICE of Order Stonehill v. CIA by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL (Attachments: # 1 Order Stonehill v. CIA)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 01/03/2024)
2024-02-0744NOTICE of Filing by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit January 12, 2024 Memorandum and Order Stonehill v. FBI Motion to Substitute)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 02/07/2024)
2024-02-1945NOTICE OF FILING ORDER Re Substitution of Parties by PAULINE DALE STONEHILL (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit February 18, 2024 Order Stonehill v. Tax Division)(Heggestad, Robert) (Entered: 02/19/2024)
2024-09-2546ORDER granting Defendant's 21 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff's [26-1] Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting Plaintiff's 33 Motion to Substitute. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on September 25, 2024. (lccjn1) (Entered: 09/25/2024)
2024-09-2547MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on September 25, 2024. (lccjn1) (Entered: 09/25/2024)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar