Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleKurtz, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice
DistrictWestern District of New York
CityBuffalo
Case Number1:2016cv00104
Date Filed2016-02-08
Date Closed2020-04-21
JudgeHon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy
PlaintiffSteven John Kurtz
PlaintiffJennifer Gradecki
Case DescriptionJennifer Gradecki, a graduate student at SUNY Buffalo, submitted a FOIA request to the FBI for records pertaining to Steven John Kurtz, a local artist and activist, apparently with Kurtz's permission. The FBI first told Kurtz that it had located 2,327 pages and asked Kurtz to commit to pay for duplication. Kurtz agreed to pay. The agency subsequently indicated there were 2,512 pages and that duplication fees would be $85. Again, Kurtz agreed to pay, but after hearing nothing further from the FBI, Gradecki filed an appeal with OIP. OIP acknowledged receipt of the appeal, but after hearing from the agency, Gradecki and Kurtz filed suit.
Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit, Litigation - Vaughn index, Litigation - Attorney's fees

DefendantU.S. Department of Justice
Documents
Docket
Complaint
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2016-02-081COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0209-2458787.), filed by Steven John Kurtz, Jennifer Gradecki.(Kuzma, Michael) (Entered: 02/08/2016)
2016-02-09E-Filing Notification: Attorney must file a civil cover sheet using the event "continuation of exhibits". (KM) (Entered: 02/09/2016)
2016-02-12Case Assigned to Hon. Richard J. Arcara. (KM) (Entered: 02/12/2016)
2016-02-12Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Notification to chambers of on-line civil opening. (KM) (Entered: 02/12/2016)
2016-02-12AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(KM) (Entered: 02/12/2016)
2016-02-12Summons issued. (KM) (Entered: 02/12/2016)
2016-02-152AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on U. S. Department of Justice on 02/12/2016, filed by Jennifer Gradecki, Steven John Kurtz. (Kuzma, Michael) (Entered: 02/15/2016)
2016-03-023NOTICE of Appearance by Michael S. Cerrone on behalf of U.S. Department of Justice (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 03/02/2016)
2016-03-044ANSWER to 1 Complaint by U.S. Department of Justice.(Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 03/04/2016)
2016-03-07AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution(KM) (Entered: 03/07/2016)
2016-03-085First MOTION for Disclosure Vaughn Index by Jennifer Gradecki, Steven John Kurtz. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support Vaughn Index)(Kuzma, Michael) (Entered: 03/08/2016)
2016-03-096TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), the parties shall confer for the purposes set forth in Rule 26(f)(2) and to propose a Case Management Order that will establish outside cut-off dates for the further progress of this case, including: (1) motions to amend the pleadings or add parties; (2) to the extent required in this case, commencement and completion of all fact discovery; (3) to the extent required in this case, completion of all expert discovery, including strict compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) regarding the identification and filing reports of testifying experts; (3) motions to compel; and (4) a proposed briefing schedule for any dispositive motions, including a proposed briefing schedule for Plaintiff's motion 5 for a Vaughn index. Because this matter appears to be exempt from Rule 26(a)'s initial disclosure requirements (see Rule 26(a)(1)(B)(i)), the parties' proposed Case Management Order need not establish outside cut-off dates for Rule 26(a) disclosures. Further, because this case largely involves judicial review of administrative action, the Court, pursuant to Section 2.2(D) of the Court's ADR Plan, sua sponte exempts this case from automatic referral to the Court's ADR program. Thus, the parties need not address issues related to ADR in their Rule 26(f) report. The parties shall file their Rule 26(f) report on or before March 30, 2016. Any failure by a party or the party's attorney to participate in good faith in the development and submission of a proposed discovery plan required by Rule 26(f) or this Text Order may result in the award of expenses and attorney's fees to the other party caused by such failure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(g). SO ORDERED. Issued by the Hon. Richard J. Arcara on March 9, 2016 (CMK). (Entered: 03/09/2016)
2016-03-307NOTICE by U.S. Department of Justice (JOINT PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER) (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 03/30/2016)
2016-04-048CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Please Note: This docket text may not contain the entire contents of the attached Order. It is your responsibility to read the attached Order and download it for future reference. Direct any questions to the Chambers of the Judge who entered this Order.)Motions to Join Parties/Amend Pleadings due by 4/30/2016. Dispositive motions due on or before 1/31/2017. Responses to dispositive motions due on or before 2/28/2017. Replies to dispositive motions due on or before by 3/31/2017. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 4/5/2016. (KM) (Entered: 04/07/2016)
2016-04-058CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Please Note: This docket text may not contain the entire contents of the attached Order. It is your responsibility to read the attached Order and download it for future reference. Direct any questions to the Chambers of the Judge who entered this Order.)Motions to Join Parties/Amend Pleadings due by 4/30/2016. Dispositive motions due on or before 1/31/2017. Responses to dispositive motions due on or before 2/28/2017. Replies to dispositive motions due on or before by 3/31/2017. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 4/5/2016. (KM) (Entered: 04/07/2016)
2016-11-189MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by U.S. Department of Justice.(Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 11/18/2016)
2016-11-1810DECLARATION signed by Michael S. Cerrone re 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery filed by U.S. Department of Justice . (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 11/18/2016)
2016-11-2111TEXT ORDER granting the Government's Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery 9 . The deadlines are extended as follows: Release of non-exempt documents responsive to plaintiffs FOIA demands shall be filed on or before December 31, 2016; Vaughn index shall be filed on or before March 17, 2017; and dispositive motions are to be filed no later than April 28, 2017. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 11/21/16. (LAS) (Entered: 11/21/2016)
2017-03-1712DECLARATION filed by U.S. Department of Justice (Vaughn Index) . (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 03/17/2017)
2017-04-2113MOTION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions by U.S. Department of Justice.(Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 04/21/2017)
2017-04-2114DECLARATION signed by Michael S. Cerrone re 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions filed by U.S. Department of Justice . (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 04/21/2017)
2017-04-2515TEXT ORDER granting Defendant's 13 Motion for Extension of Time to file dispositive motions up to and including May 31, 2017. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 4/25/17. (LAS) (Entered: 04/25/2017)
2017-05-3116MOTION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions by U.S. Department of Justice.(Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 05/31/2017)
2017-05-3117DECLARATION signed by Michael S. Cerrone re 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions filed by U.S. Department of Justice . (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 05/31/2017)
2017-06-0618TEXT ORDER: Defendant's 16 Motion for Extension of Time to file dispositive motions up to and including June 14, 2017 is granted nunc pro tunc . SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 6/6/17. (LAS) (Entered: 06/06/2017)
2017-06-0719MOTION for Summary Judgment and dismissal of plaintiff's complaint by U.S. Department of Justice. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of David M. Hardy, # 2 Exhibit A-D, # 3 Exhibit E-J, # 4 Exhibit K-N, # 5 Exhibit O-S)(Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 06/07/2017)
2017-06-0720MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment and dismissal of plaintiff's complaint byU.S. Department of Justice. (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 06/07/2017)
2017-06-0721STATEMENT OF FACTS by U.S. Department of Justice. (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 06/07/2017)
2017-06-0822TEXT ORDER: The deadlines in the Case Management Order 8 are extended as follows: Responses to the defendant's summary judgment motion and dismissal of plaintiff's complaint 19 shall be filed on or before July 5, 2017; Replies are due no later than August 2, 2017. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 6/8/17. (LAS) (Entered: 06/08/2017)
2017-07-0523First MOTION for Summary Judgment by Jennifer Gradecki, Steven John Kurtz. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Undisputed Facts, # 2 Affidavit Jennifer Gradecki, # 3 Memorandum in Support)(Kuzma, Michael) (Entered: 07/05/2017)
2017-08-0224REPLY/RESPONSE to re 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment and dismissal of plaintiff's complaint filed by U.S. Department of Justice. (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 08/02/2017)
2017-08-0225REPLY/RESPONSE to re 23 First MOTION for Summary Judgment (Response to Statement of Undisputed Facts) filed by U.S. Department of Justice. (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 08/02/2017)
2017-08-0226DECLARATION signed by David M. Hardy filed by U.S. Department of Justice . (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 08/02/2017)
2019-10-08NOTICE OF SCHEDULING: Status Conference set for 11/15/2019 at 9:00 AM before Hon. Richard J. Arcara. Issued by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 10/8/2019. (LAS) (Entered: 10/08/2019)
2019-11-1527Minute Entry for proceedings held before Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy: Status conference held on 11/15/2019. J. Arcara referred case to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for R&R on pending motion. If consent is filed, Magistrate Judge McCarthy will issue a D&O. APPEARANCES: plaintiffs represented by atty M. Kuzma; defendant represented by atty M. Cerrone. (FTR GOLD) (JD) (Entered: 11/15/2019)
2019-11-15Minute Entry for proceeding held 11/15/2019 before Hon. Richard J. Arcara. Status conference is held. The parties report that there have been no changes in the status of the case since the motions for summary judgment were filed. The Court questions the parties if they would consider consenting to a Magistrate Judge. Pltfs are willing to consent. Counsel for the Deft needs client approval. A recess is taken to afford defense counsel an opportunity to reach to his client about the consent. Proceeding resumes. Defense counsel was unable to get a response from his client. The Court directs counsel to see Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy for further proceedings on this case. If both parties consent, Magistrate Judge McCarthy will be the presiding Judge on this matter and issue a decision and order on the pending summary judgement motions. If there is no consent from defendant, the Court will refer this matter to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for a Report and Recommendation on the pending summary judgment motions. Appearances: Pltfs by Michael Kuzma; Deft by Michael Cerrone and David Coriell (Court Reporter Megan Pelka.) (DJD) (Entered: 11/19/2019)
2019-11-2228TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy. The Magistrate Judge is hereby designated to act in this case as follows: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), all pre-trial matters in this case are referred to the above-named United States Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to: (1) conduct of a scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, (2) hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications, (3) supervision of discovery, and (4) supervision of all procedural matters involving the aforementioned or involving the preparation of the case or any matter therein for consideration by the District Judge. The Magistrate Judge shall also hear and report upon dispositive motions for the consideration of the District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). All motions or applications shall be filed with the Clerk and made returnable before the Magistrate Judge. The parties are encouraged to consider the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) governing consent to either partial or complete disposition of the case, including trial if necessary, by the Magistrate Judge. Consent forms are available from the office of the Magistrate Judge or the office of the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 11/22/2019. (LAS) (Entered: 11/22/2019)
2019-11-2929NOTICE by U.S. Department of Justice (Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge) (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 11/29/2019)
2019-12-0330CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Jennifer Gradecki, Steven John Kurtz, U.S. Department of Justice. Case reassigned to Magistrate Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 12/3/19. (SG) (Entered: 12/04/2019)
2020-03-1631DECISION AND ORDER Re 5 Motion for Disclosure; 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 3/16/2020. (DAZ) (Entered: 03/16/2020)
2020-03-3132AFFIDAVIT of Michael Kuzma by Steven John Kurtz, Jennifer Gradecki filed by Steven John Kurtz, Jennifer Gradecki. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Kuzma, Michael) (Entered: 03/31/2020)
2020-04-2033STIPULATION of Dismissal by U.S. Department of Justice. (Cerrone, Michael) (Entered: 04/20/2020)
2020-04-2134TEXT ORDER: As indicated in my March 16, 2020 Decision and Order 31 , plaintiff has established his entitlement to an award of attorney's fees and costs as a prevailing party pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §552(a)(4)(E)(i). With the exception of his request for reimbursement of postage expenses, his itemization of fees totaling $2,000.00 and costs totaling $400.00 32 appears reasonable, and has been agreed to by the government. Therefore, plaintiff is awarded fees of $2,000.00 and costs of $400.00, to be paid by the government. The parties Stipulation of Discontinuance 33 is hereby approved, and the case shall be closed. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 4/21/2020. (DAZ) -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- (Entered: 04/21/2020)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar