Case Detail
Case Title | SCHMITZ v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Columbia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Washington, DC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2024cv00111 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2024-01-11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | Open | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Reggie B. Walton | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | JOSEPH E. SCHMITZ Honorable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | Joseph Schmitz submitted a FOIA request to the Department of Defense for records concerning emails from Sally Donnelly, a former senior advisor to former Defense Secretary James Mattis, concerning a variety of people and issues. The agency acknowledged receipt of the request. The agency disclosed 86 heavily redacted pages. Later, the agency released 126 heavily redacted pages, citing Exemption 6 (invasion of privacy). Schmitz then filed suit, claiming the agency had a policy or practice of routinely redacting personal information for lower-level employees. Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit, Litigation - Attorney's fees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Complaint attachment 3 Complaint attachment 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|