Case Detail
Case Title | ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Columbia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Washington, DC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2010cv01533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2010-09-13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2011-07-13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Richard J. Leon | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appeal | D.C. Circuit 11-5233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Opinion/Order [15] Opinion/Order [16] FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Richard Leon has upheld the NSA's Glomar response to EPIC concerning the public interest organization's request for records reflecting any discussion of collaboration between the agency and Google relating to alleged cyber attacks by hackers in China. Citing Section 6 of the NSA Act as an Exemption 3 statute, the agency explained that "to confirm or deny the existence of any such records would be to reveal whether the NSA. . .determined that vulnerabilities or cybersecurity issues pertaining to Google or certain of its commercial technologies could make U.S. government information systems susceptible to exploitation or attack." Finding that the agency's affidavit was sufficiently detailed, Leon rejected EPIC's claim that information widely reported by the media stripped records of FOIA protections. Instead, he pointed out that "while Glomar responses are deemed inappropriate when the specific information has already been officially and publicly disclosed by the solicited agency, such disclosure 'cannot be based on mere speculation, no matter how widespread.' The agency, itself, must waive FOIA protections through an official disclosure." EPIC also argued that its request was broad enough to encompass information that was not part of the agency's Information Assurance mission. But Leon observed that "these claims understate the [agency affidavit's] depiction of the NSA's Information Assurance mission, as well as the explanation of how the requested records would reveal information relating to the NSA activities. Simply put, it is the relationship between Google and the NSA not just the content of the records that warrants protections."
Issues: Determination - Glomar response, Exemption 3 - Statutory prohibition of disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|