Case Detail
Case Title | JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. AIR FORCE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Columbia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Washington, DC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2011cv00932 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2011-05-18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2012-04-30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | U.S. AIR FORCE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Opinion/Order [17] FOIA Project Annotation: In one of the first FOIA cases brought in the D.C. Circuit dealing directly with whether metadata is a record under FOIA, Judge Barbara Rothstein has allowed Judicial Watch to pursue its claims concerning the Air Force's response to a previous FOIA request. Judicial Watch requested all records related to the processing of its Nov. 9, 2010 request and all metadata for the Jan. 11, 2011 letter responding to the 2009 request. The parties agreed that the letter was created as a Microsoft Word document and was then turned into an Adobe Acrobat PDF and disclosed to Judicial Watch. However, the Air Force contended that the PDF was the final document and since it had already been released to Judicial Watch, the case was moot. Judicial Watch argued that the Microsoft Word document was a separate document that was responsive to its request for metadata. The Air Force agreed with Judicial Watch that the Word document was a separate document, but asserted that only the PDF file containing the electronic signature of the Air Force employee who signed it was the "particular document" in this case and that the Word document was therefore non-responsive to the current request. Rothstein disagreed with the agency. She noted that "this court construes '[a]ny and all metadata for the Air Force's letter' to encompass both the metadata embedded in the Adobe PDF file and that embedded in the Microsoft Word document file. The addition of [the] digital signature did not alter the nature of the letter. Rather, it made the file version in which the letter was written and the file version in which it was signed separate documents for the purposes of a FOIA request for 'any and all metadata' for that letter. The Microsoft Word document would carry its own unique metadata, and, if Judicial Watch is entitled to the metadata at all (an issue yet to be decided), that metadata would be encompassed by the original request. The production of the Adobe PDF file does not moot the request." While the agency focused on its mootness argument, Rothstein observed that it also "makes clear that it takes the position that metadata is not an 'agency record' under FOIA, and argues that such an interpretation is 'overbroad,' and 'cannot be reconciled with either the Act's legislative history or the D.C. Circuit's test for determining agency records.'" The agency requested "the opportunity to brief this position more fully should the court decide to reach the issue." As a result, Rothstein sent the case back to the parties for further briefing on the issue of whether metadata was an agency record.
Issues: Search - Reasonableness of search | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|