| Date Filed | Doc # | Docket Text |
|
| 2011-05-27 | 1 | COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Snohomish County Superior Court (SCSC) (Summons(es) NOT issued) (Receipt #: FILING FEE NOT PAID/IFP NOT SUBMITTED), filed by Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons)(DJ) (Entered: 05/31/2011) |
| 2011-06-02 | 2 | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE directing pltf to show cause within 30 days by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS)cc M Moynihan (Entered: 06/02/2011) |
| 2011-06-02 | 3 | Show cause deadline re 2 Order to Show Cause NOTED on motion calendar; Noting Date 7/8/2011, (RS) (Entered: 06/02/2011) |
| 2011-06-10 | 4 | MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr.(RS) (Entered: 06/14/2011) |
| 2011-06-15 | 5 | ORDER granting pltf's 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Hon. James P. Donohue.(RS)cc M Moynihan (Entered: 06/15/2011) |
| 2011-06-28 | 6 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Plaintiff Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr. (RS) (Entered: 06/29/2011) |
| 2011-07-11 | 7 | ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS)cc M Moynihan (Entered: 07/11/2011) |
| 2011-07-11 | 8 | JUDGMENT BY COURT in favor of Snohomish County Superior Court (SCSC) against Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr (RS)cc Moynihan (Entered: 07/12/2011) |
| 2011-07-18 | 9 | NOTICE OF APPEAL (11-35614) as to 7 Order, Terminated Case, 8 Judgment by Court by Plaintiff Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr. (DJ) Modified on 7/21/2011, add CCA case #(SA). (Entered: 07/19/2011) |
| 2011-07-18 | | Appeal Fees NOT received. IFP GRANTED 6/15/2011 re: 9 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr (DJ) (Entered: 07/19/2011) |
| 2011-07-18 | 10 | DESIGNATION OF RECORD by Plaintiff Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr, (re: 9 Notice of Appeal). (DJ) (Entered: 07/19/2011) |
| 2011-07-21 | 11 | TIME SCHEDULE ORDER as to 9 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr : Appellants opening brief due by 10/26/11. (SA) (Entered: 07/21/2011) |
| 2011-07-21 | | USCA Case Number 11-35614 for 9 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr. (SA) (Entered: 07/21/2011) |
| 2011-07-25 | 12 | REFERRAL NOTICE of USCA (11-35614) as to 9 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr. This matter is referred to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith.If the district court elects to revoke in forma pauperis status, the district court is requested to notify this court and the parties of such determination within 21 days of the date of this referral. If the district court does not revoke in forma pauperis status, such status will continue automatically for this appeal. (LMK) (Entered: 07/26/2011) |
| 2011-07-25 | 13 | MOTION/REFERAL NOTICE (JPD) for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. See Referral Notice from USCA 12 . (LMK) (Entered: 07/26/2011) |
| 2011-07-25 | | MOTION(S) REFERRED: re 13 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr (LMK) (Entered: 07/26/2011) |
| 2011-07-27 | 14 | Appeal Remark re 9 Notice of Appeal : Document titled AMENDING COMPLAINT INTO APPEAL UNDER 5 USC 552(a)(6) FORWARDED DIRECTLY TO NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. (Attachments: # 1 IFP paperwork)(SA) (Entered: 07/27/2011) |
| 2011-07-28 | | MOTION(S) REFERRED: re 13 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr; Per JPD chambers, motion referred back to RSL. (LMK) (Entered: 07/28/2011) |
| 2011-08-01 | 15 | CERTIFICATION 13 Referral from Ninth Court of Appeals for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Appeal not taken in good faith. by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (cc: CCA)(SA) (Entered: 08/01/2011) |
| 2011-08-01 | 16 | Appeal Remark re 9 Notice of Appeal : Copy of Certification served on 9th Circuit Court of Appeals(SA) (Entered: 08/01/2011) |
| 2011-09-14 | 17 | ORDER of USCA (11-35614) as to 9 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Francis Moynihan, Jr The district court has certified that appellants claims are frivolous and that this appeal is not taken in good faith. We also deny appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis because we find the appeal appears to be frivolous. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTION. (SA) (Entered: 09/14/2011) |
 Hide Docket Events |
