Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleSonds v. Cuomo et al
DistrictNorthern District of New York
CitySyracuse Prisoner
Case Number9:2011cv00895
Date Filed2011-07-29
Date Closed2012-03-20
JudgeJudge Norman A. Mordue
PlaintiffReginald Sonds
DefendantAndrew M. Cuomo New York State Office of the Attorney General
DefendantUnited States of America
DefendantNYS DOCS
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Opinion/Order [8]
Opinion/Order [10]
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2011-07-291COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Reginald Sonds.{postmarked: 7/26/11}(nas) (Entered: 07/29/2011)
2011-07-292MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Reginald Sonds. Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (nas ) (Entered: 07/29/2011)
2011-08-293MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction ( Motion Hearing set for 9/29/2011 10:00 AM in Syracuse before US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, Response to Motion due by 9/12/2011, Reply to Response to Motion due by 9/19/2011.), MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction ( Motion Hearing set for 9/29/2011 10:00 AM in Syracuse before US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, Response to Motion due by 9/12/2011, Reply to Response to Motion due by 9/19/2011.), MOTION to Strike ( Motion Hearing set for 9/29/2011 10:00 AM in Syracuse before US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, Response to Motion due by 9/12/2011, Reply to Response to Motion due by 9/19/2011.) filed by NYS DOCS, Andrew M. Cuomo. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Patricia Dallmann, # 2 Exhibit(s) A ;to Dallmann declaration, # 3 Affirmation of Jim Seaman, # 4 Exhibit(s) A to Seaman affirmation, # 5 Memorandum of Law, # 6 Appendix 1 to memo of law, # 7 Appendix 2 to memo of law, # 8 Appendix 3 to memo of law, # 9 Declaration of Service of a copy of all documents on pro se plaintiff) Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (Seaman, James) (Entered: 08/29/2011)
2011-09-164Letter Motion for Reginald Sonds requesting an extension of time until 1/12/12 to file a response to the motion to dismiss and for certified copies of docket sheet; defendants' proof of service of motion to dismiss and orders filed in this action. (nas) (Entered: 09/16/2011)
2011-09-20TEXT ORDER RE: 4 Letter Request. Plaintiff has sent a letter motion requesting an extension of time to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's request is granted to the extent that a response is now due on or before November 12, 2011. The Clerk is also directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet. Authorized by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 9/20/11. {text order and docket sheet proviced to plaintiff via regular mail}(nas ) (Entered: 09/20/2011)
2011-10-215Letter Motion for Reginald Sonds requesting an extension of time to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss. (nas ) (Entered: 10/21/2011)
2011-10-24TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a letter motion requesting an extension of time to respond to defendant's 3 motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 5 . Plaintiff's motion is granted to the extent that plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss will be due on or before November 30, 2011. Furthermore, in response to Plaintiff's statement that he is unable to access a copy machine, plaintiff is advised that, when necessary, he may make handwritten copies of his documents. The Clerk is also directed to send plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet. Authorized by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 10/24/11. {text order and copy of docket sheet served via regular mail on plaintiff}(drs/nas) (Entered: 10/24/2011)
2011-11-076Letter Motion for Reginald Sonds requesting an extension of time until 12/30/11 to respond to the motion to dismiss. (nas) (Entered: 11/07/2011)
2011-11-09TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to plaintiff's request (Dkt. No. 6 ), the deadline for filing a response to defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 3 ) is reset to December 30, 2011. Any reply to that response shall be filed by January 6, 2012. Authorized by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 11/9/11. {text order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(drs/nas) (Entered: 11/09/2011)
2012-01-067Letter Motion for Reginald Sonds requesting an extension of time until 2/29/12 to respond to the motion to dismiss. (Attachments: # 1 envelope)(nas ) (Entered: 01/06/2012)
2012-01-10TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a letter motion requesting a fourth extension of time to respond to 3 defendants' motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 7 . Plaintiff's request is granted to the extent that any response shall be filed by January 31, 2012. No further extensions shall be granted. If plaintiff fails to respond by January 31, 2012, the court will proceed to decide the motion to dismiss without plaintiff's response. If defendants wish to file a reply to plaintiff's response, they must seek Court permission. Authorized Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 1/10/12. {text order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas) (Entered: 01/10/2012)
2012-02-038REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED that 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED based on 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). RECOMMENDED, that defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 3 ) be GRANTED, and that plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i)(ii). RECOMMENDED, that if the District Court approves this recommendation, the court certify that any appeal from this matter would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 2/3/12. Objections to R&R due by 2/17/2012 Case Review Deadline 2/24/2012{r&r served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties} (nas) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-219RESPONSE in Opposition re 3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Reginald Sonds. (nas, ) (Entered: 02/21/2012)
2012-03-2010MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that 8 Report and Recommendation is accepted in its entirety. ORDERED that 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied; ORDERED that 3 Motion is granted. Signed by Judge Norman A. Mordue on 3/20/12. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas) (Entered: 03/20/2012)
2012-03-2011JUDGMENT entered dismissing the action with prejudice in accordance with the 3/20/12 Order of Judge Mordue.{judgment served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties} (nas) (Entered: 03/20/2012)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar