Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleANGUIMATE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
DistrictDistrict of Columbia
CityWashington, DC
Case Number1:2012cv00791
Date Filed2012-05-16
Date Closed2013-03-27
JudgeJudge Reggie B. Walton
PlaintiffPAULETTE ANGUIMATE
DefendantUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
Opinion/Order [17]
FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Reggie Walton has ruled that the Department of Homeland Security properly claimed Exemption 5 (deliberative process privilege) to withhold an Assessment Referral Notice prepared by an Immigration Asylum Officer recommending that Paulette Anguimate be denied asylum. Anguimate submitted a FOIA request for the records concerning her asylum application. When the agency denied some of the records based on Exemption 5, she filed suit. She was granted asylum by an immigration judge in November 2012. Walton found the agency had justified that the memo was privileged. He noted that "the portions of the Assessment containing the Asylum Officer's analysis of the credibility of the plaintiff's claims and recommendation that she be denied asylum [is] quintessential deliberative information. . ." Walton rejected Anguimate's contention that disclosure would not harm the agency. He pointed out that "it is not the role of the courts to 'second-guess congressional judgment on a case-by-case basis;' rather, once it is determined that the two elements of the deliberative process privilege are satisfied, the judicial inquiry is complete." He also rejected her argument that the assessment constituted secret law. He observed that "on the contrary, given that the plaintiff was ultimately granted asylum, it appears that the agency's final position on the asylum issue was the opposite of what the Asylum Officer recommended in the Assessment. The Assessment is best characterized, then, as an interlocutory opinion issued prior to the initiation of the plaintiff's immigration court proceedings."
Issues: Exemption 5 - Privileges - Deliberative process privilege - Deliberative, Exemption 5 - Privileges - Deliberative process privilege - Predecisional
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2012-05-161COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616048259) filed by PAULETTE ANGUIMATE. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(td, ) (Entered: 05/18/2012)
2012-05-16SUMMONS (3) Issued as to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (td, ) Modified to correct filed date on 5/18/2012 (td, ). (Entered: 05/18/2012)
2012-05-302RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 05/16/12. (Cleveland, David) (Entered: 05/30/2012)
2012-05-303RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/16/2012. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/15/2012. (Cleveland, David) (Entered: 05/30/2012)
2012-05-304RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 5/16/2012 (Cleveland, David) (Entered: 05/30/2012)
2012-06-135Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kelly, Wynne) (Entered: 06/13/2012)
2012-06-18MINUTE ORDER granting 5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. For good cause shown, it is ORDERED that the Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the defendant shall respond to the complaint on or before July 16, 2012. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 6-18-12. (lcrbw3, ) (Entered: 06/18/2012)
2012-06-20Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer or respond to complaint by 7/16/2012, (mpt) (Entered: 06/20/2012)
2012-07-166MOTION for Summary Judgment by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Defendant's Statement of Material Facts -- Declaration of Jill A. Eggleston with attachments, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Kelly, Wynne) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
2012-07-247MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment by PAULETTE ANGUIMATE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(nmw, ) (Entered: 07/24/2012)
2012-07-25MINUTE ORDER granting 7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. For good cause shown, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file her response in opposition to the defendant's motion for summary judgment on or before August 13, 2012. It is further ORDERED that the defendant shall file its reply in support of its summary judgment motion on or before August 27, 2012. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 7-25-12. (lcrbw3, ) (Entered: 07/25/2012)
2012-07-26Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 8/13/2012. Defendant's Reply due by 8/27/2012. (mpt) (Entered: 07/26/2012)
2012-08-058Memorandum in opposition to re 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PAULETTE ANGUIMATE. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Respondent's motion to compel, # 2 Declaration Declaration of David Cleveland concerning the Arlington Asylum Office, # 3 Text of Proposed Order draft order)(Cleveland, David) (Entered: 08/05/2012)
2012-08-069MOTION for Summary Judgment by PAULETTE ANGUIMATE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cleveland, David) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
2012-08-2310Memorandum in opposition to re 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts in Opposition to Plaintiff's Statement of Facts, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kelly, Wynne) (Entered: 08/23/2012)
2012-08-2311REPLY to opposition to motion re 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (Kelly, Wynne) (Entered: 08/23/2012)
2012-08-3012REPLY to opposition to motion re 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PAULETTE ANGUIMATE. (Cleveland, David) (Entered: 08/30/2012)
2013-01-0313ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, the parties shall file a joint status report on or before January 7, 2013, discussing (1) whether the plaintiff's deportation proceedings were conducted in November 2012; (2) whether the defendant has produced to the plaintiff the Assessment she seeks in this lawsuit; and (3) whether this case still presents a live, justiciable controversy. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 1-3-13. (lcrbw3) (Entered: 01/03/2013)
2013-01-04Set/Reset Deadline: The parties shall file a joint status report on or before 1/7/2013. (ad) (Entered: 01/04/2013)
2013-01-0714RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY re 13 Order, Joint Status Report . (Kelly, Wynne) (Entered: 01/07/2013)
2013-01-0715Joint STATUS REPORT by PAULETTE ANGUIMATE. (rdj) (Entered: 01/08/2013)
2013-01-2416ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 9 Motion for Summary Judgment. In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion issued this same date, it is ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the plaintiff's APA and due process claims, and as to the propriety of the defendant's withholding of the Assessment in full pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5, but is otherwise DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that the defendant shall file a supplemental brief on or before February 7, 2013, addressing the plaintiff's arguments urging the Court to issue a declaratory judgment that the defendant's administrative responses to her FOIA request violated 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(A)(i), and an injunction barring such violations in the future. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file a memorandum in opposition to the defendant's supplemental brief on or before February 21, 2013. It is further ORDERED that the defendant shall file a reply in support of its supplemental brief on or before February 28, 2013. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 1-24-13. (lcrbw3) (Entered: 01/24/2013)
2013-01-2417MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 1-24-13. (lcrbw3) (Entered: 01/24/2013)
2013-01-25Set/Reset Deadlines: Supplemental Brief due by 2/7/2013; Opposition due by 2/21/13; Reply due by 2/28/13. (mpt, ) (Entered: 01/25/2013)
2013-02-0718RESPONSE TO ORDER OF THE COURT re 16 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,,,,,,,,, (Supplemental Brief) filed by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (Kelly, Wynne) (Entered: 02/07/2013)
2013-02-1919REPLY 18 to Defendant's Supplemental Brief filed by PAULETTE ANGUIMATE. (Cleveland, David) Modified on 2/20/2013 (td, ). (Entered: 02/19/2013)
2013-02-2820REPLY re 19 Reply to Document, 18 Response to Order of the Court filed by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (Kelly, Wynne) (Entered: 02/28/2013)
2013-03-2621ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, it is ORDERED that, insofar as the plaintiff has moved for reconsideration of the Court's January 24, 2013 Memorandum Opinion and Order, that motion is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that, because the Court lacks jurisdiction over the plaintiff's claims challenging the defendant's administrative response to her FOIA request, the remaining claims in this case are DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 3-26-2013. (lcrbw3) (Entered: 03/26/2013)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar