Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleASKANAZI v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
DistrictDistrict of Columbia
CityWashington, DC
Case Number1:2012cv01284
Date Filed2012-07-30
Date Closed2013-02-20
JudgeJudge Emmet G. Sullivan
PlaintiffJEFFREY ASKANAZI
DefendantDRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2012-07-301COMPLAINT against DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616050449) filed by JEFFREY ASKANAZI. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jf, ) (Entered: 08/03/2012)
2012-07-30SUMMONS Not Issued as to DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION (jf, ) (Entered: 08/03/2012)
2012-08-09Summons (1) Issued as to DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION. (jf, ) (Entered: 08/09/2012)
2012-08-242RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION served on 8/17/2012 (dr) (Entered: 09/04/2012)
2012-09-273MOTION for Summary Judgment, MOTION for Payment of the $350 Filing fee made by the DEA by JEFFREY ASKANAZI (dr) (Entered: 10/01/2012)
2012-11-064STIPULATION Agreement for Compromise Settlement and Release of Freedom of Information Act Claims by DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION. (Zeff, Mitchell) (Entered: 11/06/2012)
2012-12-21MINUTE ORDER. In view of the stipulation filed by the parties on November 6, 2012 indicating that the case has reached a settlement, the parties are hereby directed to file a stipulation of dismissal by no later than January 11, 2013. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on December 21, 2012. (lcegs2) (Entered: 12/21/2012)
2012-12-27NOTICE: The Minute Order entered 12/21/12 was mailed to JEFFREY ASKANAZI at the address of Court's Record. (clv, ) (Entered: 12/27/2012)
2012-12-27Set/Reset Deadlines: parties stipulation of dismissal due by 1/11/2013. (clv, ) (Entered: 12/27/2012)
2013-02-19MINUTE ORDER. The Clerk's Office is directed to administratively close this matter pending further Order of the Court. Such administrative closure does not serve as a dismissal of either party's claims or defenses. It is without prejudice to, and will have no effect upon, either party's rights, claims, or defenses, except to the extent that defendant may not argue that as a result of this stay, plaintiff's claims are untimely or have not been exhausted. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on February 19, 2013. (lcegs2) (Entered: 02/19/2013)
2013-02-20NOTICE: Minute Order Mailed to JEFFREY ASKANAZI at court's address of record. (mac) (Entered: 02/20/2013)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar