Case Detail
Case Title | LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATION, INC. v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Columbia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Washington, DC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2012cv00280 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2012-02-17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2013-01-18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Richard J. Leon | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATION, INC. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appeal | D.C. Circuit 13-5053 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Opinion/Order [18] FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Richard Leon has ruled that the IRS properly withheld records from its examination file of Life Extension Foundation under a variety of exemptions. The agency withheld 52 pages under Exemption 5 (deliberative process privilege) concerning its investigation of the Foundation's tax-exempt status. Agreeing with the agency, Leon noted that "the memorandum are predecisional and deliberative in nature, and thus subject to the deliberative process privilege. Both documents. . .despite plaintiff's arguments to the contrary, contain inter-agency material that was generated as part of a continuous process of agency decision-making, namely what determination the IRS should make with regard to plaintiff's tax-exempt status." The Foundation argued that the agency had failed to show that it had considered disclosing segregable portions of the memos. But Leon pointed out that "the IRS's supporting declarations provide sufficient descriptions of the contents of the withheld documents, as well as the specific pages affected by each exemption claim and make clear that all withheld documents were reviewed line-by-line to identify reasonably segregable materials. . .This showing is thus sufficient to allow the Court to determine that no portion of the fully-withheld documents could be segregated and subsequently released." The agency also withheld 11 pages under Exemption 7(D) (confidential sources) and furnished an in camera affidavit explaining the basis for its exemption claim. Leon observed that "the detailed in camera submissions from the IRS confirm that the withheld documents are part of an investigatory record compiled for law enforcement purposes, that sources supplied the information under circumstances which indicate assurances of confidentiality, and that disclosure of any portion of the document would reveal the identity of confidential sources. In other words, the court is satisfied that the sources provided information under at least an implied promise of confidentiality, and that disclosure of this information via release of these 11 pages, which contains identifying information throughout, could reasonably be expected to disclose their identities."
Issues: Exemption 5 - Privileges - Deliberative process privilege - Deliberative, Exemption 5 - Privileges - Deliberative process privilege - Predecisional | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|