Case Detail
Case Title | Moore v. United States of America | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Maryland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Baltimore | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2013cv02353 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2013-08-13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2014-08-01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge William D Quarles, Jr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | Sim B. Moore, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | Sim Moore submitted a FOIA request to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for his personnel records. The agency acknowledged receipt of the request, but after hearing nothing further from the agency, Moore filed suit. Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | United States of America | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Opinion/Order [13] FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in Maryland has ruled that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms conducted an adequate search for personnel records requested by former employee Sim Moore. Moore requested his entire personnel file and when the agency failed to respond in a timely manner, he filed suit. After being told that his file was at the National Personnel Records Center, the agency finally produced his entire personnel file with redactions of third party personal information. Believing the agency's response was incomplete, Moore provided the agency with a list of six categories of records he believed should be in his personnel file pertaining to disciplinary actions, a signed settlement agreement, and medical records. But the Branch Chief of Payroll told the agency FOIA office that "the items listed by Mr. Moore are not the types of items that are filed in the [Official Personnel File]." The agency contended Moore was required to submit another FOIA request for the items in the list he provided to the agency, but Moore argued those documents were responsive to his original request. The court agreed with the agency, noting that "although Moore believes that additional documents are responsive to his request, agencies are not obligated to look beyond the 'four corners' of a FOIA request 'when formulating their searches, nor [are] they required to chase rabbit trails that may appear in documents uncovered during their search.' Moore's FOIA request, on its face, seeks only a copy of his 'complete' personnel file 'including' all the documents within it. ATF reasonably interpreted Moore's request to mean that he wanted a copy of his OPF, which it produced in full. If Moore wishes ATF to produce additional documents that were not in his OPF, he should submit a second FOIA request."
Issues: Adequacy - Search | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|