Case Detail
Case Title | Western Energy Alliance v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Colorado | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Denver | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2013cv02811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2013-10-15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2015-05-29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | Western Energy Alliance a Colorado non-profit organization | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | Western Energy Alliance requested information concerning the peer review process for a report entitled "Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Objectives Final Team Report." The Fish and Wildlife Service acknowledged that it received the request but had not responded by the time Western Energy Alliance filed suit. Complaint issues: exhaustion of administrative remedies, improper withholding, attorney's fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service a federal agency within in the United States Department of the Interior | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appeal | Tenth Circuit 14-1435 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Complaint attachment 3 Complaint attachment 4 Complaint attachment 5 Complaint attachment 6 Complaint attachment 7 Complaint attachment 8 Opinion/Order [16] FOIA Project Annotation: The court ruled that the Western Energy Alliance is not entitled to attorney's fees for its suit against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for records pertaining to the peer review of the Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Objectives Final Report. WEA filed suit after the agency failed to respond to its request. Although the agency disclosed the records after litigation commenced, WEA pursued its request for attorney's fees. Assessing the public interest in disclosure, the court noted that "WEA, in its motion, asserts that the information was shared 'with its members and other stakeholder groups,' and 'referenced' in lobbying activities. WEA, in its reply, also suggests that its use of the material has been somewhat successful in attracting the attention of policy makers. Although WEA nakedly alleges that its use of the material will benefit the public, there is no demonstration that the documents were disseminated for the benefit of the 'public' as opposed to the benefit of only WEA's dues-paying members. . .Even assuming that the limited materials that WEA obtained would be of substantial public interestâ€"it appears the final version of the report was already publicâ€"WEA has used the material exclusively for the benefit of its members and failed to disseminate it to the public." Because the materials had only benefited WEA's members, the court indicated that its self-interest motive was sufficient to encourage it to pursue litigation. But the court found the agency's explanation for the delayâ€"that the request had been misplaced and the agency was short-staffedâ€"was not convincing. The court pointed out that "it is difficult to divine a 'reasonable basis in law' that could support the government's delay." However, the court observed that "because three of the four factors weigh against an award, and FWS cooperated in resolving the matter quickly after litigation commenced, the Court finds that an award of attorney fees is not justified in this case."
Issues: Litigation - Attorney's fees - Entitlement - Personal interest, Litigation - Attorney's fees - Entitlement - Public benefit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|