Case Detail
| Case Title | AGUIRRE-BEISA et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| District | District of Columbia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| City | Washington, DC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Case Number | 1:2013cv02051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date Filed | 2013-12-25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date Closed | 2014-04-04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Judge | Judge Royce C. Lamberth | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plaintiff | EMILIANO AGUIRRE-BEISA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plaintiff | NECLA LANE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Case Description | Necla Lane, the attorney for Emiliano Aguirre-Beisa, requested all records pertaining to Aguirre-Beisa's case before the Executive Office of Immigration Review. EOIR responded that it was taking a 10-day extension of the 20-day time limit for unusual circumstances. After hearing nothing further after the 30 days had expired, Aguirre-Beisa filed suit. Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit, Litigation - Attorney's fees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Defendant | EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Complaint attachment 3 Complaint attachment 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| User-contributed Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (