Case Detail
Case Title | DE PACO v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of New Jersey | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Trenton | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 3:2014cv05017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2014-08-08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2016-01-27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Mary L. Cooper | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | CESAR MANUEL CARDOSO MATOS DE PACO | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | After six years of participation in the program, U.S. Customs and Border Protecton revoked Cesar Manuel Cardoso Matos De Paco's membership in the Global Entry Entrusted Traveler program. De Paco appealed the agency's decision, which was upheld. He then submitted a FOIA request for all records in his CBP file. After hearing nothing further from the agency, De Paco filed suit. Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Opinion/Order [12] FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in New Jersey has ruled that U.S. Customs and Border Protection properly withheld records pertaining to why Cesar Manuel Cardoso Matos de Paco was removed from the Global Trusted Traveler Program under Exemption 6 (invasion of privacy), Exemption 7(C) (invasion of privacy concerning law enforcement records), and Exemption 7(E) (investigative methods and techniques). Matos de Paco was told in 2014 that his membership in the Global Trusted Traveler Program had been revoked because he did not meet the eligibility requirements. Matos de Paco requested his alien file. CBP responded by providing him 11 redacted records concerning his revocation in the global traveler program. The court agreed with the agency that various identifying information was protected either under Exemption 6 or Exemption 7(C). The court noted that "while FOIA encourages an open and transparent government, we find that disclosure of terminal identifiers and employees' names and phone numbers amounts to a 'clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy' that provides little insight to the public as to why CBP revoked Plaintiff's membership in the global traveler program, or how CBP responds to such inquiries generally." The court approved of redactions made under Exemption 7(E) pertaining to the agency's TECS database. The court observed that "the [agency's] affidavit details with great specificity the volume and sensitivity of the data that is collected by the TECS system. The affidavit further detailed the importance of protecting the TECS system from security risks because of its role as a 'fundamental law enforcement tool' that aids 'in assisting CBP to meet its primary mission to prevent terrorists, their weapons, and other dangerous items from entering the United States.' Thus, the records were properly redacted under Exemption 7(E) as the information was gathered using the TECS system."
Issues: Exemption 6 - Invasion of privacy, Exemption 7(C) - Invasion of privacy concerning law enforcement records, Exemption 7(E) - Investigative methods or techniques | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|