Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleLapp v. The Federal Bureau Of Investigation
DistrictNorthern District of West Virginia
CityClarksburg
Case Number1:2014cv00160
Date Filed2014-09-19
Date Closed2016-02-23
JudgeDistrict Judge Irene M. Keeley
PlaintiffEric M Lapp
Case DescriptionEric Lapp, the owner of Fingerprint Solutions, a company dealing with the storage and use of fingerprints, submitted a FOIA request to the FBI for a list of all public housing agencies that had submitted requests to the FBI for Originating Agency Identifiers. The agency told Lapp that it was unable to search based on the description of records he provided. Lapp appealed the denial to the Office of Information Policy, which upheld the agency's decision and told Lapp he could further appeal to the Office of Government Information Services. Lapp appealed to OGIS, but that agency told him it had limited authority to act. Lapp finally filed suit.
Complaint issues: Withholding not related to exemption claims, Litigation - Attorney's fees

DefendantThe Federal Bureau Of Investigation
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
Complaint attachment 2
Complaint attachment 3
Complaint attachment 4
Complaint attachment 5
Complaint attachment 6
Complaint attachment 7
Complaint attachment 8
Complaint attachment 9
Complaint attachment 10
Complaint attachment 11
Complaint attachment 12
Opinion/Order [34]
FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in West Virginia has ruled that the FBI properly responded to Eric Lapp's request for records concerning procedures for public housing authorities to access the FBI's fingerprint database for purposes of background checks by telling Lapp that it was unable to search for the records requested and had no obligation under FOIA to create records responsive to his request. Lapp, the owner of Fingerprint Solutions, a company specializing in acquiring, storing, and submitted fingerprints to authorized recipients, made a multi-part request to the FBI for records about access to its fingerprint database by Originating Agency Identifiers, a nine-character identifier developed by the FBI and assigned to qualified agencies to access the agency's Criminal Justice Information Services database. The agency told Lapp it had no way to search for the records. Lapp appealed to OIP, which affirmed the FBI's decision, explaining to Lapp that agencies were not required to create records to respond to a FOIA request. Lapp then appealed to OGIS. In response to OGIS's efforts, the FBI disclosed 119 pages to Lapp, which were responsive to two subparts of his request. For the records disclosed, the agency withheld ORIs under Exemption 7(E) (investigative methods or techniques), claiming disclosure would might allow criminals to gain insight into how to access the FBI's fingerprint database. Lapp called the claim ludicrous, but the court agreed with the agency, noting that "the Court discounts Lapp's underestimation of the criminal element and gives deference to the declarations of FBI professionals in area over the bare conclusory assertions of Lapp. Furthermore, the Court is confounded by Lapp's assertion that, just because a criminal actor would have to jump over additional hurdles, the FBI is required to give them a boost over the first hurdle by releasing the ORIs." The court explained the sensitivity of the ORIs, indicating that "the ORIs are compiled to provide authorized users access to criminal databases at the FBI." As to whether the agency was required to compile records in response to other portions of Lapp's request, the court pointed out that "the FBI would be required to 'dig out' the answer to Lapp's questions regarding the channelers used and number of fingerprint submissions from a variety of locations, as well as requiring them to research outside the FBI. Moreover, it would require them to perform calculations relating to the number of fingerprint submissions based on accounting data inside and outside the FBI. This is beyond what the FOIA requires." Lapp also requested attorney's fees, arguing that the FBI's disclosure of the 119 pages occurred on the last day on which the agency was required to respond to his complaint. The court found Lapp had not substantially prevailed and that the FBI's disclosure of the 119 pages occurred as the result of OGIS's involvement and not because of Lapp's suit.
Issues: Request - Specificity
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2014-09-191COMPLAINT against The Federal Bureau Of Investigation, filed by Eric M Lapp. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1 letter dated 3/23/2014, # 2 Attachment 2 letter dated 5/9/2014, # 3 Attachment 3 Appeal, # 4 Attachment 4 receipt of Appeal, # 5 Attachment 5 Plaintiff's appeal denied 3/19/2014, # 6 Attachment 6 emailed dated 6/6/2014, # 7 Attachment 7 document date 6/6/2014, # 8 Attachment 8 emailed 6/11/2014, # 9 Attachment 9 Discovery, # 10 Attachment 10 Letter dated 8/14/2014, # 11 Attachment 11 OGIS response dated 8/20/2014, # 12 Civil Cover Sheet)(jmm) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
2014-09-192Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number WVNC001138. (jmm) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
2014-09-24460 day SUMMONS Returned Executed as to The Federal Bureau Of Investigation served on 9/19/2014. (jmm) (Entered: 09/24/2014)
2014-12-08860- Day SUMMONS Returned Executed as to The Federal Bureau Of Investigation served upon US Attorney General on 12/1/2014 by certified mail (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(cc) (Entered: 12/08/2014)
2014-12-08960- Day SUMMONS Returned Executed as to The Federal Bureau Of Investigation served upon U.S. Attorney, NDWV by certified mail, no date of deliver entered. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(cc) Modified on 12/8/2014 to modify text re date of delivery (cc). (Entered: 12/08/2014)
2014-12-1110Federal Defendant's ANSWER to 1 Complaint,, by The Federal Bureau Of Investigation.(Altmeyer, Helen) (Entered: 12/11/2014)
2015-01-0811FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING: ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Rule 26 Meeting to be held by 1/21/2015. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/4/2015. Scheduling Conference set for 2/19/2015 03:00 PM in Clarksburg District Judge Courtroom, 2nd Floor before District Judge Irene M. Keeley. Discovery due by 2/23/2015. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 1/8/2015. (copy to counsel of record via CM/ECF) (nmm) (Entered: 01/08/2015)
2015-01-1312MOTION to Stay re 11 FirstOrder,, and Notice Regarding Discovery and Scheduling by The Federal Bureau Of Investigation. (Altmeyer, Helen) (Entered: 01/13/2015)
2015-01-2013Plaintiff's RESPONSE to 12 Motion to Stay re 11 First Order and Notice Regarding Discovery and Scheduling filed by Eric M Lapp. (Document faxed to Wheeling Clerk's Office for filing as filer was experiencing technical difficulty) (rjs) (Entered: 01/20/2015)
2015-01-2114ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING: The Court grants in part the FBI's 12 Motion to Stay to the extent it seeks a stay of any discovery disclosures. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 1/21/15. (jss) (Entered: 01/21/2015)
2015-02-1715NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Carter on behalf of The Federal Bureau Of Investigation (Carter, Erin) (Main Document 15 replaced on 2/19/2015 to remove fillable pdf document) (cnd). (Entered: 02/17/2015)
2015-02-1816ORDER: The Court RESCHEDULES the Scheduling Conference previously set for 2/19/15 to 3/4/2015 11:00 AM in Clarksburg District Judge Courtroom, 2nd Floor before District Judge Irene M. Keeley. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 2/18/15. (cnd) (Entered: 02/18/2015)
2015-03-0417MINUTE ENTRY: ***NOTICE*** THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT IS NOT ACCESSIBLE. IT IS FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY. Proceedings held before District Judge Irene M. Keeley. Scheduling Conference held on 3/4/2015. (Court Reporter Linda Bachman) (dk) (Entered: 03/04/2015)
2015-03-0418SUMMARY ORDER; Court ORDERED the defendant to file its declaration on or before March 20, 2015. Status Conference (by telephone) set for 3/26/2015 11:00 AM in Clarksburg District Judge Courtroom, 2nd Floor before District Judge Irene M. Keeley. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 3/4/2015. (copy counsel of record)(jmm) (Entered: 03/04/2015)
2015-03-0619DOCUMENT WAS CORRUPT - CONTACTED ATTORNEY AND REQUESTED THAT THE DOCUMENT BE REFILED. AFFIDAVIT of David M. Hardy by The Federal Bureau Of Investigation. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Certificate of Service)(Carter, Erin) . (Main Document 19 replaced on 3/9/2015) (jss). Modified on 3/9/2015 - DOCUMENT WAS CORRUPT ATTORNEY TO REFILE - REGENERATED NEF (jss). (Entered: 03/06/2015)
2015-03-0920AFFIDAVIT of David M. Hardy by The Federal Bureau Of Investigation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Carter, Erin) (Entered: 03/09/2015)
2015-03-0921AFFIDAVIT re 19 Affidavit, of David M. Hardy (Corrected) by The Federal Bureau Of Investigation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 10 Attachment Certificate of Service)(Carter, Erin) (Entered: 03/09/2015)
2015-03-2022ORDER: PAPERLESS ORDER (The Status Conference previously set for 3/26/2015 at 11:00 AM has been RESCHEDULED and is now set for 3/27/2015 at 11:00 AM (by telephone). Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 3/20/2015. (dk) (Entered: 03/20/2015)
2015-03-2723MINUTE ENTRY: ***NOTICE*** THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT IS NOT ACCESSIBLE. IT IS FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY. Proceedings held before District Judge Irene M. Keeley. Status Conference held on 3/27/2015. (Court Reporter Linda Bachman) (dk) (Entered: 03/27/2015)
2015-03-2724SUMMARY ORDER: It is ORDERED that Defendant shall file any additional declarations by 4/24/15; the parties shall file any motions for summary judgment by 5/29/15; the parties shall file any response briefs by 6/19/15; and the parties shall file any reply briefs by 7/3/15. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 3/27/15. (cnd) (Entered: 03/27/2015)
2015-03-27Set Deadlines per 24 Summary Order: Responses due by 6/19/2015, Replies due by 7/3/2015, Motions due by 5/29/2015. (cnd) (Entered: 03/27/2015)
2015-04-2425AFFIDAVIT of J. Kevin Grant by The Federal Bureau Of Investigation. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Carter, Erin) (Entered: 04/24/2015)
2015-05-2926MOTION for Summary Judgment by The Federal Bureau Of Investigation. (Carter, Erin) (Entered: 05/29/2015)
2015-05-2927MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of Its' Motion for Summary Judgment by The Federal Bureau Of Investigation re 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment . (Carter, Erin) (Entered: 05/29/2015)
2015-05-2928MOTION for Summary Judgment by Eric M Lapp. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Letter)(Moye, Danny) (Entered: 05/29/2015)
2015-06-1929RESPONSE in Opposition re 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The Federal Bureau Of Investigation. (Carter, Erin) (Entered: 06/19/2015)
2015-06-1930RESPONSE to Motion re 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Eric M Lapp. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment)(Moye, Danny) (Entered: 06/19/2015)
2015-07-0331REPLY to Response to Motion re 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Eric M Lapp. (Moye, Danny) (Entered: 07/03/2015)
2015-12-2732First MOTION Status Conference by Eric M Lapp. (Moye, Danny) (Entered: 12/27/2015)
2016-02-0833ORDER: The Court SCHEDULES a Status Conference for 2/24/2016 04:00 PM in Judge Keeley Chambers before District Judge Irene M. Keeley. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 2/8/16. (cnd) (Entered: 02/08/2016)
2016-02-2334MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that Defendant's 26 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Plaintiff's 28 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; Plaintiff's Complaint as it pertains to information sought in Requests 1 and 2 is DISMISSED AS MOOT; the remainder of Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court CANCELS the Status Conference scheduled for 2/24/16. The Clerk is directed to enter a separate judgment order. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 2/23/16. (cnd) (Entered: 02/23/2016)
2016-02-2335CLERK'S JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that Defendant's 26 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Plaintiff's 28 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; Plaintiff's Complaint as it pertains to information sought in Requests 1 and 2 is DISMISSED AS MOOT; the remainder of Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Clerk on 2/23/16. (cnd) (Entered: 02/23/2016)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar