Case Detail
Case Title | PIKE et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Columbia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Washington, DC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2015cv00301 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2015-03-02 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2016-09-27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | ADAM PIKE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | BRET M. BERRY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | Adam Pike and Bret Berry, owners/operators of Reliance Medical Systems, a manufacturer of implantable spinal devices, submitted a FOIA request to the Department of Justice for an audio recording of a July 26, 2011 conversation between Berry, Pike and an unidentified physician that was used by DOJ as part of its case against Berry and Pike for violations of the False Claims Act. DOJ refused to disclose the recording, denying access on the basis of Exemption 5 (privileges) and Exemption 7(A) (interference with ongoing investigation or proceeding). Berry and Pike appealed to OIP, which upheld the denial on the basis of Exemption 7(A). Berry and Pike then filed suit. Complaint issues: Exemption 7(A) - Interference with ongoing investigation, Litigation - Attorney's fees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appeal | D.C. Circuit 16-5303 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Complaint attachment 3 Complaint attachment 4 Complaint attachment 5 Opinion/Order [20] FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson has ruled that the Justice Department may withhold under Exemption 7(A) (ongoing investigation or proceeding) an audio recording made by a confidential source pertaining to an investigation of Reliance Medical Systems for fraud, even though portions of the transcript of the recording were publicly disclosed as part of a False Claims Act suit brought against Adam Pike and Bret Berry. However, Jackson found the government had waived its ability to claim a FOIA exemption for those portions of the transcript that had been made public. Pike and Berry learned of the existence of the audio recording and transcript as a result of the FCA suit. They requested a copy of the audio recording and the transcript, arguing the agency had waived its ability to withhold the records by making portions of the transcript public. The Civil Division found both the audio recording and the transcript and withheld them under Exemption 7(A) as well as Exemption 7(D) (confidential sources). Since Jackson found Exemption 7(A) covered the records, she did not address the 7(D) claim. Finding the records qualified as law enforcement records, Jackson noted that "the record evidence plainly establishes that there is a connection between these plaintiffs and a possible violation of federal law, which is all that is required to support DOJ's assertion that the law-enforcement-purposes requirement has been met." Pike and Berry's primary objection was that the agency had waived its right to withhold any of the records because it had publicly disclosed portions of the transcript. Rejecting the claim, Jackson observed that "this contention is unavailing as a matter of pure logic: the mere fact that the government has chosen to release some parts of a protected documentâ€"and bear the brunt of the harm that resultsâ€"does not a fortiori mean that releasing the entire document would not be harmful." But she agreed with Pike and Berry that the government had waived any FOIA claim to withhold the exact portions of the transcript that had already been made public. However, she concluded the waiver applied only to the published portions and to nothing else. She explained that "plaintiffs have not shown that the government has released from the transcript of the audio recording any publicly available information other than the excerpts quoted in the FCA complaint and press release. And nowhere in the FOIA statute or in related case law is the government required to produce otherwise-exempted information on the ground that withholding it would allegedly result in unfairness or disadvantage to the requesting party." Jackson found the waiver did not apply to the audio recording either. She noted that "although the transcript excerpts that have been publicly quoted contain words that are identical to the words spoken in the audio version of those same excerpts, DOJ asserts that the voice inflection in the audio version reveals additional information; specifically the identity of the individual who created the recording. This information is entitled to be withheld under Exemption 7(A) and no part of the audio version of the recorded conversation has ever been publicly disclosed, which means that the government has not waived its right to continue to withhold the information that the audio recording conveys pursuant to Exemption 7(A)."
Issues: Exemption 7(A) - Interference with ongoing investigation, Public domain | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|