Case Detail
Case Title | Gahagan v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | Eastern District of Louisiana | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | New Orleans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 2:2015cv00796 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2015-03-11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2016-03-04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | Michael W. Gahagan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | Michael Gahagan, an immigration attorney, submitted a FOIA request to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for Form I-485 for his client Lloyd Patterson, who is facing removal proceedings. The agency responded with 509 pages, 33 pages of which were referred to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and 11 pages that were withheld entirely. According to Gahagan, none of the pages contained the Form I-485 he had requested. Gahagan filed an appeal challenging the adequacy of the agency's search. The agency responded by partially disclosing another 10 pages. Again, none of them were the Form I-485 Gahagan requested. Gahagan then filed suit. Complaint issues: Adequacy - Search, Litigation - Vaughn index, Litigation - Attorney's fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appeal | Fifth Circuit 16-30882 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Complaint attachment 3 Complaint attachment 4 Complaint attachment 5 Opinion/Order [10] Opinion/Order [22] Opinion/Order [31] FOIA Project Annotation: Ruling on immigration attorney Michael Gahagan's motions for attorney's fees, a federal court in Louisiana has ruled that Gahagan is not entitled to attorney's fees because there was no evidence that his suit to gain access to a record showing his client had applied for U.S. citizenship through a relative furthered the public interest or that the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services had acted unreasonably. Gahagan had urged the court to award attorney's fees based on recent awards in several other cases. But the court noted that "it is clear that Gahagan is not entitled to attorney's fees." The court explained that "Gahagan here only sought a single record for use in his client's removal proceedings. He had no larger purpose aimed at benefitting the public. . ." The court added that "this Court cannot fathom any way in which that request sheds light on immigration policies. The process and policy here are quite apparentâ€"all Gahagan needed was proof that his client had taken the step of applying for permanent resident status. . .The release of this form here only served to help Gahagan's client, Mr. Patterson, and Gahagan himself." The agency did not contend that Gahagan was primarily motivated by a commercial interest, but the court observed that "it is evident that Gahagan received some indirect commercial benefit through the receipt of the document because he is now able to more effectively advocate for his client and maintain the reputation of his law practice, which is undeniably a commercial endeavor." Because Gahagan had failed to show the existence of any public interest benefit from disclosure of the record and because the agency had acted properly, the court indicated Gahagan was not entitled to attorney's fees.
Issues: Litigation - Attorney's fees - Entitlement - Public benefit, Litigation - Attorney's fees - Entitlement - Commercial interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|