Case Detail
Case Title | MACLEOD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Columbia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Washington, DC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2015cv01792 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2015-10-20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2017-09-21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | WILLIAM DALE MACLEOD | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | William MacLeod, a Canadian national, filed suit against the Department of Homeland Security, the NSA, and the General Services Administration alleging they had denied access to various records. MacLeod claimed a cause of action under FOIA, but there is no indication that he filed a request with any agency. Complaint issues: Adequacy - Search | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Washington, DC 20505 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Opinion/Order [19] FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson has ruled that the Department of Homeland Security and the CIA properly responded to William MacLeod's broad requests for records. MacLeod, a Canadian citizen, applied twice for a NEXUS card, which allows for expedited customs processing when crossing the border between the United States and Canada. In his youth, MacLeod had been convicted of threatening bodily harm. As a result of that conviction, U.S Customs and Border Protection rejected his applications for a NEXUS card. MacLeod filed suit pro se to challenge the denial. Because he had also filed FOIA requests with the Department of Homeland Security and the CIA, and contended that he had sent requests to the National Security Agency and the General Services Administration, although neither agency could find a record of having requests a request from him, he included claims against those agencies under FOIA as well. In challenging the denial of his application for a NEXUS card, MacLeod contended that his conviction should have been expunged by Canada and that he had a constitutionally-based right to travel between Canada and the United States. Jackson found none of his arguments relevant to whether or not CBP improperly denied his application and dismissed the charges. Although none of the FOIA requests related directly to the denial of his NEXUS application, Jackson found the agencies had done nothing wrong in handling his requests. Both the NSA and the GSA provided affidavits explaining that they never received MacLeod's requests and since MacLeod had provided no evidence to contradict those claims, Jackson accepted their explanations. MacLeod claimed to be a Member of Parliament and argued he should have a diplomatic status. Nevertheless, after conducting a search, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services found no records. Jackson observed that "having made the unrebutted representation that it does not maintain the records that MacLeod requested, DHS is likewise entitled to summary judgment on MacLeod's FOIA claim." DHS subsequently decided that the Department of State might have relevant records and referred the request there. State declined to process the request unless MacLeod made the request directly to State and DHS explained that situation to Jackson. The CIA had rejected MacLeod's request as too broad. Jackson agreed, noting that "the agency is right to assert that a plaintiff who has not presented a reasonably specific request for documents, in violation of that agency's own FOIA regulations, can also be conceived of as having failed to exhaust available administrative remedies prior to bringing suit." She added that "it is clear on the face of MacLeod's letter that the categories of records he seeks are not at all specific, and the records sought are far from reasonably described."
Issues: Adequacy - Search | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|