Case Detail
Case Title | FREEDOM WATCH, INC. v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Columbia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | Washington, DC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 1:2018cv01912 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2018-08-15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2019-01-04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge James E. Boasberg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | FREEDOM WATCH, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | Freedom Watch submitted a FOIA request to the FBI for records concerning collaboration and/or communications between the agency and the Southern Poverty Law Center since 2008. After hearing nothing further from agency, Freedom Watch filed suit. Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit, Adequacy - Search, Litigation - Vaughn index, Litigation - Attorney's fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Complaint attachment 3 Opinion/Order [16] FOIA Project Annotation: Judge James Boasberg has ruled that Freedom Watch failed to exhaust its administrative remedies when it filed suit against the FBI after the agency told the organization that its request for records concerning any communications between the FBI and the Southern Poverty Law Center since 2008 did not sufficiently describe the records sought to allow the agency to conduct a search. The agency suggested that Freedom Watch provide more specific information. Freedom Watch filed suit instead. Boasberg noted that "the FBI's determination gave Freedom Watch two routes forward. It could have resubmitted its FOIA request with the additional detail required â€" thus perfecting its request â€" or it could have administratively appealed the FBI's assessment that its request was incomplete. Apparently unhappy with those options, Plaintiff instead brought its grievance to this Court, challenging the FBI's denial of an unperfected request that Freedom Watch did not administratively appeal. By doing so, it created two related grounds to dismiss the suit. No matter how it is sliced, Plaintiff's case cannot go forward." Freedom Watch argued it was not required to file an administrative appeal because to do so would be futile. Boasberg pointed out that "although a 'futility exception' to exhaustion does exist, it is reserved for narrow circumstances, such as when 'an agency has articulated a very clear position on the issue which it has demonstrated it would be unwilling to reconsider,' Freedom Watch points to no such circumstance here, nor can the Court glean any possible support for Plaintiff's position from its review of the Complaint and the FBI's communications with that entity. This Hail Mary lands incomplete."
Issues: Litigation - Jurisdiction - Failure to Exhaust | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|