Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleLUKAS v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
DistrictDistrict of Columbia
CityWashington, DC
Case Number1:2019cv00465
Date Filed2019-02-25
Date Closed2020-03-05
JudgeJudge Royce C. Lamberth
PlaintiffRUSSELL D. LUKAS
Case DescriptionRussell Lukas, an attorney representing ABS, submitted a FOIA request to the Federal Communications Commission for records concerning an appeal of a decision by Windstream to terminate its dealership agreement with ABS because of conflicts of interest. The agency acknowledged receipt of the request. The agency disclosed 45 pages of the Windstream appeal and withheld seven pages under Exemption 7(E) (investigative methods and techniques) and redacted portions of the disclosed pages under Exemption 7(E) and Exemption 6 (invasion of privacy). Lukas later amended his FOIA request to request only Exhibit E of the Windstream appeal decision. After hearing nothing further from the agency, Lukas filed suit.
Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit, Litigation - Attorney's fees

DefendantFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
AppealD.C. Circuit 20-5082
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
Complaint attachment 2
Complaint attachment 3
Complaint attachment 4
Opinion/Order [23]
FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Royce Lamberth has ruled that the FCC properly withheld an attachment prepared by Windstream Communications because it contained proprietary information for purposes of Exemption 4 (confidential business information). Russell Lukas requested records that had been submitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company by Windstream Communications. USAC had denied universal service functions to three healthcare providers in rural Texas that had selected Windstream as their telecommunications service provider and Lukas asked for Windstream's written appeal of that denial. The FCC's Wireline Competition Bureau provided located a 52-page responsive document and disclosed 45 pages. After Lukas filed an administrative appeal, the agency provided more documents. Ultimately, the only unresolved issue was redactions made by Windstream in Exhibit E of Windstream's appeal. Lukas filed suit to force the agency to disclose those redactions. Lukas argued that the FCC had claimed Exemption 4 even before Windstream had asserted its commercial sensitivity. Lamberth found there was nothing wrong with the agency's process here. He pointed out that "although Windstream's assertion of commercial sensitivity is helpful to the FCC's decision to redact Exhibit E, it was not necessary in order for the Court to uphold the redactions, as FOIA allows the agency to make its own determinations regarding what information should be withheld or redacted under any of FOIA's nine exemptions. Furthermore, just because the agency initially based the redactions in Exhibit E on other exemptions does not make its ultimate decision regarding Exemption 4 improper, nor does it demonstrate bad faith. Agencies are (and should be) permitted to change their minds as they process FOIA requests â€" if the FCC had not been permitted to alter its decisions throughout this process, Mr. Lukas would not have received the documents that were initially withheld pursuant to the agency's original decision in September of 2017."
Issues: Exemption 4 - Confidential business information
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2019-02-251COMPLAINT against FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5964938) filed by Russell D. Lukas. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons)(Lukas, Russell) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/26/2019) (zef, ). (Entered: 02/25/2019)
2019-02-26Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zef, ) (Entered: 02/26/2019)
2019-02-262SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) (Entered: 02/26/2019)
2019-04-013Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nebeker, William) (Entered: 04/01/2019)
2019-04-094ORDER granting 3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION answer due 5/6/2019. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 04/09/2019. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 04/09/2019)
2019-05-065MOTION to Dismiss And , MOTION for Summary Judgment by FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attachment A, # 2 Exhibit Attachment B, # 3 Exhibit Attachment C, # 4 Exhibit Attachment D, # 5 Exhibit Attachment E, # 6 Exhibit Attachment F, # 7 Exhibit Attachment G, # 8 Exhibit Attachment H, # 9 Exhibit Attachment I, # 10 Declaration Jeffrey Steinberg, # 11 Text of Proposed Order)(Nebeker, William) (Entered: 05/06/2019)
2019-05-086Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment by RUSSELL D. LUKAS (Lukas, Russell) (Entered: 05/08/2019)
2019-05-157MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by RUSSELL D. LUKAS (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Leave to Amend Complaint, # 2 Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief)(Lukas, Russell) (Entered: 05/15/2019)
2019-05-168ORDER granting 6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 5 MOTION to Dismiss And MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 6/10/2019; Replies due by 7/10/2019. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 05/16/2019. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 05/16/2019)
2019-05-299RESPONSE re 7 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. (Nebeker, William) (Entered: 05/29/2019)
2019-06-0510ORDER granting 7 Motion to Amend/Correct. Further ORDERED that leave is GRANTED to Plaintiff to file his Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 06/04/2019. (lcrcl3) Modified on 6/6/2019 (lsj). (Entered: 06/05/2019)
2019-06-0512AMENDED COMPLAINT against FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION filed by RUSSELL D. LUKAS.(ztd) (Entered: 06/12/2019)
2019-06-1011Memorandum in opposition to re 5 MOTION to Dismiss And MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by RUSSELL D. LUKAS. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Olaintiff's Declaration as to Material Facts, # 3 Attachments A-j)(Lukas, Russell) (Entered: 06/11/2019)
2019-06-1913MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION for Summary Judgment by FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Steinberg, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Nebeker, William) (Entered: 06/19/2019)
2019-07-0314MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment by RUSSELL D. LUKAS (Lukas, Russell) (Entered: 07/03/2019)
2019-07-0315NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (Nebeker, William) (Entered: 07/03/2019)
2019-07-0816ORDER granting 14 Motion for Extension of Time. Responses due by 7/15/2019; Replies due by 8/21/2019. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 07/05/2019. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 07/08/2019)
2019-07-1617Memorandum in opposition to re 13 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by RUSSELL D. LUKAS. (Attachments: # 1 Plaintiff's Declaration as to Material Facts, # 2 Proposed Order)(Lukas, Russell) (Entered: 07/16/2019)
2019-08-2118REPLY to opposition to motion re 13 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. (Nebeker, William) (Entered: 08/21/2019)
2019-11-0719MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by RUSSELL D. LUKAS (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, # 2 Statement of Material Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Dispute, # 3 Declaration in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, # 4 Attachments 1-9 to Declaration in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, # 5 Proposed Order)(Lukas, Russell) (Entered: 11/07/2019)
2020-02-1320MOTION to Stay re 19 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative , MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 19 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nebeker, William) (Entered: 02/13/2020)
2020-02-2521Memorandum in opposition to re 20 MOTION to Stay re 19 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 19 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by RUSSELL D. LUKAS. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Lukas, Russell) (Entered: 02/25/2020)
2020-03-0322REPLY to opposition to motion re 20 MOTION to Stay re 19 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 19 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. (Nebeker, William) (Entered: 03/03/2020)
2020-03-0523MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 03/05/2020. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 03/05/2020)
2020-03-0524ORDER granting 5 and 13 Defendant's Motions to Dismiss Counts I and II and for Summary Judgment on Count III. 19 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is denied. Judgment is entered for defendant. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 03/05/2020. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 03/05/2020)
2020-03-0525ORDER denying as moot 20 Motion to Stay Or In the Alternative for Extension of Time to File. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 03/05/2020. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 03/05/2020)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar