Case Detail
Case Title | Contreras & Metelska, P.A. v. U.S. Department of Justice et al | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District | District of Minnesota | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City | DMN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Number | 0:2020cv01261 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Filed | 2020-05-27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date Closed | 2020-06-29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judge | Judge Susan Richard Nelson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaintiff | Contreras & Metelska, P.A. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Description | The law firm of Contreras & Metelska submitted a FOIA request to the Department of Justice for records concerning a federation agreement between the Executive Office for Immigration Review and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The agency acknowledged receipt of the request. The agency told the law firm that its request qualified for unusual circumstances and would take some time to process. After hearing nothing further from the agency, Contreras & Metelska filed suit. Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit, Litigation - Attorney's fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | U.S. Department of Justice | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defendant | Executive Office for Immigration Review | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documents | Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Opinion/Order [20] FOIA Project Annotation: A federal court in Minnesota has ruled that Nico Ratkowski, an attorney at the immigration law firm of Contreras & Metelska, is not entitled to attorney's fees for his FOIA suit against the Executive Office for Immigration Review for records concerning a federation agreement between EOIR and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement pertaining to the scheduling of immigration hearings. After seeing an announcement from the American Immigration Lawyers Association indicating that the Department of Homeland Security was moving to a new computer scheduling system for immigration hearings, which included a reference to an EOIR-ICE federation agreement allowing ICE personnel to use a single sign-on, Ratkowski submitted a FOIA request in December 2019 to EOIR for the federation agreement. EOIR told Ratkowski that his request qualified for unusual circumstances and referred his request to the Justice Management Division, which coordinated with ICE to locate the federation agreement. The entire process was also complicated by the pandemic. JMD disclosed a redacted version of the federation agreement in June 2020. Ratkowski then filed a motion for attorney's fees, arguing that his suit caused the agency to respond more quickly. The court disagreed, noting that "while Defendants provided the responsive document after the filing of this lawsuit, that fact alone fails to show that Plaintiff's lawsuit substantially caused Defendants to provide the document. While Plaintiff speculates about ICE's 'hasty' response once litigation commenced, and the timing of DOJ's workplace response to the COVID-19 pandemic, by every indication, Defendants were diligently attempting to Plaintiff's request under challenging circumstances."
Issues: Litigation - Attorney's fees - Eligibility - Causal effect | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-contributed Documents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docket Events (Hide) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|