Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleAlvaro Casillas Villarreal v. United States of America
DistrictCentral District of California
CityWestern Division - Los Angeles
Case Number2:2022cv09069
Date Filed2022-12-12
Date Closed2023-01-30
JudgeJudge Unassigned
PlaintiffAlvaro Casillas Villarreal
Case DescriptionAlvaro Casillas Villarreal, a Mexican citizen, submitted a FOIA request to the DEA for records concerning money-laundering charges against him for using too much cash for transactions. After hearing nothing further from the agency, Casillas Villarreal filed suit.
Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit

DefendantUnited States of America
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text
2022-12-121PETITION'S SECOND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PETITION PURSUANT TO 5 USC SECTION 552 (a) filed against United States of America, filed by petitioner Alvaro Casillas Villarreal. (ghap) (Entered: 12/15/2022)
2022-12-152NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH FILING OF PRISONER COMPLAINT mailed to Petitioner Alvaro Casillas Villarreal. Upon filing of your complaint it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support form (CV-60P) attached. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date above, your action will be dismissed and the file closed. If you submit the CV-60P form or pay the filing fee within THIRTY DAYS, judges will be assigned. You may return your fee waiver and/or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. Re Petition (case opening) 1 . (Attachments: # 1 CV-60P) (ghap) (Entered: 12/15/2022)
2023-01-303ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The Court sent a warning letter to Plaintiff advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal or remand of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected. Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED without prejudice. (yl) (Entered: 01/31/2023)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar