Case Detail

FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson has ruled that the State Department properly invoked Exemption 1 (national security) to withhold a diplomatic cable sent from the U.S. Embassy in London reporting on the United Kingdom's plans concerning the British Indian Ocean Territory. The UNROW Human Rights Impact Litigation Clinic at American University Law School represented the Chagossians, a group of displaced indigenous people from the Chagos Archipelago in the British Indian Ocean Territory. UNROW had requested and received records in the past from the State Department and the Defense Intelligence Agency about the Chagossians. While one of its requests was still pending at State in 2010, The Guardian published the 2009 cable, part of the Wikileak disclosures. In 2013, UNROW sent FOIA requests to State and DIA for copies of the 2009 cable referred to in The Guardian article. DIA acknowledged UNROW's request and explained that since the cable likely originated with State, it would refer any records it found to State for final determination. DIA found a 7-page record that it referred to State. State found the same document and in its response letter to UNROW indicated that "record searches by the Department of State and by the Defense Intelligence Agency each resulted in the retrieval of one identical document responsive to [UNROW's] requests," and that State had determined to withhold the document under Exemption 1. UNROW filed suit, arguing that the cable was already in the public domain and that the State Department had officially acknowledged its existence. UNROW also urged Jackson to review the document in camera. Further, UNROW argued that DIA had improperly delegated its obligation to make a determination on the disclosability of the document by allowing State to make the sole determination. Jackson found the cable satisfied several of the categories of the executive order on classification for purposes of finding disclosure would harm national security. She pointed out that State's affidavits "specifically identify the origin of the information and articulate the damage its disclosure would do to relations with the United Kingdom and the chilling effect it would have on U.S. relations with countries and other sources of sensitive information. This argument is perfectly plausible; indeed, courts in this circuit have long recognized the legitimacy of this species of national security harm in the FOIA context." UNROW's primary argument that the government had waived the exemption through official acknowledgement was that the State Department's letter said that documents found by both State and DIA were "identical," which UNROW interpreted as meaning identical to the document that appeared in The Guardian. Jackson found this interpretation defied common sense and noted that the State Department's explanation of the word "identical" was far more convincing. She pointed out that "the plain and unambiguous role of the adjective 'identical' in the sentence is to make clear that State and DIA each turned up the same document; without that crucial modifier, the sentence would suggest that the Departments turned up two different documents, each of which was responsive to UNROW's requests. Surely, if State had intended to convey that the responsive document was identical to UNROW's attached copy of The Guardian document, it could have done so more clearly." She observed that "in the final analysis, then, UNROW finds itself in an unfortunate Catch-22: everything it asserts about the content of the withheld document is based on The Guardian document, but The Guardian document has never been officially acknowledged and thus cannot form the basis of a valid waiver claim." Jackson rejected UNROW's request that she review the document in camera "to determine whether any portion of the document falls outside of State's expressed confidentiality concern such that it may be released." But she noted that "the agency explained that the entire document contains sensitive content, such that even a partial disclosure would break a promise of confidentiality and chill relations with a foreign government. . ." Jackson found DIA had not violated FOIA by referring the document it found to State as the originator of the document for a disclosure determination. She observed that "the record is unambiguous that DIA possessed a copy of a seemingly responsive document that originated with State, and DIA believed State to be the proper authority to make the determination about responsiveness and disclosure."
Issues: Exemption 1 - Harm to national security, Public domain

Date Filed	Doc #	Docket Text
2013-10-15	1	ENTERED IN ERROR.....CIVIL COVER SHEET by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW, COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief against DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-3500594), REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW filed by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons DOS Summons, # 3 Summons DIA Summons)(Beydoun, Ali) Modified on 10/16/2013 (ztnr, ). (Entered: 10/15/2013)
2013-10-15	2	COMPLAINT by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY and WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-3501168), (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons)(Beydoun, Ali) (Entered: 10/15/2013)
2013-10-16	3	NOTICE of Change of Address by Ali A. Beydoun (Beydoun, Ali) (Entered: 10/16/2013)
2013-10-16		Case Assigned to Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. (md, ) (Entered: 10/16/2013)
2013-10-16	4	ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED (2) as to DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE. (Attachments: # 1 Summons 2nd, # 2 Notice of Consent, # 3 Consent Form)(md, ) (Entered: 10/16/2013)
2013-10-17	5	ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED (2) as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Summons 2nd, # 2 Notice of Consent, # 3 Consent Form)(md, ) (Entered: 10/17/2013)
2013-10-31	6	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on 10/17/2013 (Beydoun, Ali) (Main Document 6 replaced on 10/31/2013) (jf, ). (Entered: 10/31/2013)
2013-10-31	7	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY served on 10/17/2013 (Beydoun, Ali) (Main Document 7 replaced on 10/31/2013) (jf, ). (Entered: 10/31/2013)
2013-10-31	8	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/17/2013. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/16/2013. (Beydoun, Ali) (Main Document 8 replaced on 10/31/2013) (jf, ). (Entered: 10/31/2013)
2013-10-31	9	RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 10/17/13. (Beydoun, Ali) (Main Document 9 replaced on 10/31/2013) (jf, ). (Entered: 10/31/2013)
2013-11-18	10	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 2 Cover Sheet, Complaint, Request for Summons to Issue,,, by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 11/18/2013)
2013-11-19		MINUTE ORDER granting 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by 12/18/2013. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 11/19/2013. (lckbj1) (Entered: 11/19/2013)
2013-12-18	11	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 2 Cover Sheet, Complaint, Request for Summons to Issue,,, and Respond to Requests for Admission by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 12/18/2013)
2013-12-20		MINUTE ORDER granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer and to Respond to Requests for Admission. Defendants shall respond to the pending Requests for Admission and answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 1/6/2014. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 12/20/2013. (lckbj1) (Entered: 12/20/2013)
2014-01-06	12	ANSWER to Complaint by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE.(Interrante, John) (Entered: 01/06/2014)
2014-01-06	13	MOTION for Protective Order by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 01/06/2014)
2014-01-08		MINUTE ORDER. Pending before the Court is 13 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order, wherein Defendants seek an order barring discovery in this matter absent further Court order. The motion does not comply with this Court's Local Rules, as it does not state (1) whether the discussion that LCvR 7(m) requires has occurred and (2) whether the plainitff opposes the motion. See LCvR 7(m). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that 13 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order is DENIED without prejudice and with leave to refile. Any refiled motion must comply with the Court's Local Rules, including LCvR 7(m). Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 1/8/2014. (lckbj1) (Entered: 01/08/2014)
2014-01-16	14	MOTION for Protective Order (Renewed) by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 01/16/2014)
2014-01-21	15	ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE of Appearance by Ali A. Beydoun on behalf of UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW (Beydoun, Ali) Modified on 1/21/2014 (jf, ). (Entered: 01/21/2014)
2014-01-21		NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Docket No. re 15 Notice of Appearance was entered in error and counsel was instructed to refile said pleading using their assigned login/password. (Counsel should review LCvR 5.4)(jf, ) (Entered: 01/21/2014)
2014-01-30	16	Memorandum in opposition to re 14 MOTION for Protective Order (Renewed) filed by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Beydoun, Ali) (Entered: 01/30/2014)
2014-02-10	17	REPLY to opposition to motion re 14 MOTION for Protective Order (Renewed) filed by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE. (Interrante, John) (Entered: 02/10/2014)
2014-03-26	18	NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Louise Palmer on behalf of UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW (Palmer, Erin) (Main Document 18 replaced on 3/27/2014) (jf, ). (Entered: 03/26/2014)
2014-03-26	19	ORDER approving authorization by the supervising attorney for the law student, Seema Niki Kadaba, to appear in court or at other proceedings an to prepare documents. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 3/26/14. (gdf) (Entered: 03/28/2014)
2014-03-26	20	ORDER approving authorization by the supervising attorney for the law student, Sydney L. Pomykata, to appear in court or at other proceedings an to prepare documents. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 3/26/14. (gdf) (Entered: 03/28/2014)
2014-03-26	21	ORDER approving authorization by the supervising attorney for the law student, Marie Soueid, to appear in court or at other proceedings an to prepare documents. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 3/26/14. (gdf) (Entered: 03/28/2014)
2014-03-26	22	ORDER approving authorization by the supervising attorney for the law student, Jacob Zoghlin, to appear in court or at other proceedings an to prepare documents. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 3/26/14. (gdf) (Entered: 03/28/2014)
2014-07-22	23	MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Renewed Motion for Protective Order by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Renewed Motion for a Protective Order, # 2 Exhibit Letter from L. Hartmann to A. Beydoun, # 3 Exhibit Email from A. Beydoun to J. Interrante, # 4 Exhibit Email from A. Beydoun to J. Interrante, # 5 Exhibit Pl.'s Second Set of RFAs to DoS, # 6 Exhibit Letter from J. Interrante to A. Beydoun, # 7 Exhibit Bancoult v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs 2014 EWCA Civ 708, # 8 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Beydoun, Ali) (Entered: 07/22/2014)
2014-07-25	24	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 14 Motion for Protective Order; denying 23 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum. See attached document for details. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 07/25/2014. (lckbj1) (Entered: 07/25/2014)
2014-07-25		MINUTE ORDER setting briefing schedule. The following deadlines shall govern this matter: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is due by by 9/23/2014; Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion, and Plaintiff's cross-motion is due by 10/23/2014; Defendants' reply, and Defendants' opposition to Plaintiff's cross-motion is due by 11/24/2014; Plaintiff's reply is due by 12/15/2014. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 07/25/2014. (lckbj1) (Entered: 07/25/2014)
2014-07-25	25	GENERAL ORDER AND GUIDELINES FOR CIVIL CASES BEFORE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON. The Court will hold the parties and counsel responsible for following these directives; failure to conform to this Order may, when appropriate, result in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 7/25/2014. (lckbj1) (Entered: 07/25/2014)
2014-07-28		Set/Reset Deadlines: Summary Judgment motions due by 9/23/2014. Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 10/23/2014. Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 11/24/2014. Plaintiff's Reply due by 12/15/2014. (hs) (Entered: 07/28/2014)
2014-09-19	26	NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW. Attorney Erin Louise Palmer terminated. (Palmer, Erin) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
2014-09-23	27	MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Attachments: # 1 Declaration John F. Hackett (Department of State), # 2 Exhibit Hackett 1, # 3 Exhibit Hackett 2, # 4 Exhibit Hackett 3, # 5 Exhibit Hackett 4, # 6 Exhibit Hackett 5, # 7 Exhibit Hackett 6, # 8 Exhibit Hackett 7, # 9 Exhibit Hackett 8, # 10 Exhibit Hackett 9, # 11 Exhibit Hackett 10, # 12 Exhibit Hackett 11, # 13 Exhibit Hackett 12, # 14 Declaration Alesia Y. Williams (DIA), # 15 Exhibit Williams A, # 16 Exhibit Williams B, # 17 Exhibit Williams C, # 18 Exhibit Williams D, # 19 Exhibit Williams E, # 20 Exhibit Williams F, # 21 Exhibit Williams G, # 22 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 09/23/2014)
2014-09-24	28	NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW. Attorney Marie Soueid; Jacob Zoghlin; Seema Niki Kadaba and Sydney L. Pomykata terminated. (Beydoun, Ali) (Entered: 09/24/2014)
2014-10-23	29	Memorandum in opposition to re 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Text of Proposed Order, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Exhibit, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Exhibit, # 16 Exhibit, # 17 Exhibit, # 18 Exhibit, # 19 Exhibit, # 20 Exhibit, # 21 Exhibit, # 22 Exhibit)(Beydoun, Ali) (Entered: 10/23/2014)
2014-10-23	30	Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW. (See Docket Entry 29 to view document) (jf, ) (Entered: 10/24/2014)
2014-10-24		to file cross motion for smjgm (jf, ) (Entered: 10/24/2014)
2014-11-21	31	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 30 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 11/21/2014)
2014-11-24		MINUTE ORDER granting, for good cause shown, 31 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. The briefing schedule in this matter is amended as follows: Defendants' consolidated reply and opposition to Plaintiff's cross-motion is due by 12/24/2014; Plaintiff's reply is due by 1/26/2015. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 11/24/2014. (lckbj1) (Entered: 11/24/2014)
2014-12-22	32	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 30 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 12/23/2014)
2014-12-23		MINUTE ORDER granting, for good cause shown, 32 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 30 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment. Defendants' consolidated opposition to Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment is due by 1/14/2015. Plaintiff's reply in support of its CrossSummary Judgment is due by 2/17/2015. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 12/23/2014. (lckbj1) (Entered: 12/23/2014)
2015-01-13	33	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 30 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 01/13/2015)
2015-01-20		MINUTE ORDER granting, for good cause shown 33 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. The briefing schedule in this matter is amended as follows: Defendants' consolidated reply and opposition to Plaintiff's cross-motion is due by 1/21/2015; Plaintiff's reply is due by 2/24/2015. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 1/20/2015. (lckbj1) Modified on 1/20/2015 (gdf). (Entered: 01/20/2015)
2015-01-21	34	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 30 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 01/21/2015)
2015-01-28		MINUTE ORDER granting 34 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 27 Motion for Summary Judgment, nunc pro tunc to 1/21/2015. The briefing schedule in this matter is amended as follows: Defendants' consolidated reply and opposition to Plaintiff's cross-motion is due by 1/28/2015; Plaintiff's reply is due by 3/3/2015. No further extensions of time for Defendants to file their consolidated reply and opposition to Plaintiff's cross-motion will be granted. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 1/28/2015. (lckbj1) (Entered: 01/28/2015)
2015-01-28	35	REPLY to opposition to motion re 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts Reply and Response)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 01/28/2015)
2015-01-28	36	RESPONSE re 30 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment (Duplicate of ECF 35) filed by DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts Response and Reply)(Interrante, John) (Entered: 01/28/2015)
2015-02-12	37	ERRATA by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW 30 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Exhibit G, # 3 Exhibit H, # 4 Exhibit U)(Beydoun, Ali) (Entered: 02/12/2015)
2015-02-12	38	ERRATA by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW 29 Memorandum in Opposition,, filed by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Exhibit G, # 3 Exhibit H, # 4 Exhibit U)(Beydoun, Ali) (Entered: 02/12/2015)
2015-02-23	39	ORDER approving authorization by the supervising attorney for the law student, Jacob Brody, to appear in court or at other proceedings an to prepare documents. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 9/22/14. (gdf) (Entered: 02/27/2015)
2015-02-23	40	ORDER approving authorization by the supervising attorney for the law student, Alexandra Arango, to appear in court or at other proceedings an to prepare documents. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 9/22/14. (gdf) (Entered: 02/27/2015)
2015-02-23	41	ORDER approving authorization by the supervising attorney for the law student, Diana Damschroder, to appear in court or at other proceedings an to prepare documents. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 9/22/14. (gdf) (Entered: 02/27/2015)
2015-03-03	42	REPLY to opposition to motion re 30 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by UNROW HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT LITIGATION CLINIC AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts Reply)(Beydoun, Ali) (Entered: 03/03/2015)
2015-09-29	43	MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting 27 Defendants' motion for summary judgment and denying 30 Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on September 29, 2015. (lckbj3, ) (Entered: 09/29/2015)
2015-09-29	44	ORDER granting 27 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 30 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on September 29, 2015. (lckbj3, ) (Entered: 09/29/2015)
Hide Docket Events