Skip to content

Case Detail

[Subscribe to updates]
Case TitleMichael Graybill v. National Security Agency et al
DistrictCentral District of California
CityWestern Division - Los Angeles
Case Number2:2023cv08754
Date Filed2023-10-17
Date ClosedOpen
JudgeJudge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong
PlaintiffMichael Robert Graybill
Case DescriptionMichael Graybill submitted FOIA requests to the National Security Agency and the CIA for records concerning himself. The agencies acknowledged receipt of the requests but after hearing nothing further from the agencies, Graybill filed suit.
Complaint issues: Failure to respond within statutory time limit, Litigation - Attorney's fees

DefendantNational Security Agency NSA
DefendantCentral Intelligence Agency CIA
Documents
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
Complaint attachment 2
User-contributed Documents
 
Docket Events (Hide)
Date FiledDoc #Docket Text

2023-10-171COMPLAINT against Defendants Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency.Case assigned to Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian., filed by plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill. (Attachments: # 1 CV-71, # 2 Summons) (ghap) (Entered: 10/19/2023)
2023-10-172REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill. (ghap) (Entered: 10/19/2023)
2023-10-173NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint - (Discovery), 1 . The following error(s) was/were found: No interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) (Entered: 10/19/2023)
2023-10-194NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (ghap) (Entered: 10/19/2023)
2023-10-195NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) (Entered: 10/19/2023)
2023-10-196Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) (Entered: 10/19/2023)
2023-10-207ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Request is GRANTED.; granting 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support. (aco) (Entered: 10/23/2023)
2024-02-058AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency amending Complaint - (Discovery), 1 , filed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill(yl) (Entered: 02/07/2024)
2024-02-079PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill, upon Defendant Central Intelligence Agency served on 2/7/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to (name not indicated). Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (yl) (Entered: 02/09/2024)
2024-02-0710PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill, upon Defendant National Security Agency served on 2/7/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (yl) (Entered: 02/09/2024)
2024-02-2311CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill (yl) (Entered: 02/26/2024)
2024-02-2312CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill, identifying Lockheed Martin Corporation, Other Affiliate Microsoft Corporation, Other Affiliate RTX (Raytheon) Corporation, Other Affiliate Constellis Corporation, Other Affiliate Triple Canopy Corporation, Other Affiliate Department of Defense Contractors and Central Intelligence Contractors for Michael Robert Graybill. (yl) (Entered: 02/26/2024)
2024-03-211361 DAY Summons Issued on Amended Complaint 8 as to Defendants Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency. (yl) (Entered: 03/21/2024)
2024-04-1914DECLARATION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR EMERGENCY COURT Ordered Protection filed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill. (yl) (Entered: 04/22/2024)
2024-04-2415EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 6/9/2024 re Amended Complaint 8 filed by Defendant National Security Agency. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint) (Attorney Sarah L Cronin added to party National Security Agency(pty:dft)) (Cronin, Sarah) (Entered: 04/24/2024)
2024-04-2516Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave [ECF No. 14 ] and Granting Defendants Time to Respond to Complaint [ECF No. 15 ] by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court GRANTS Defendants' ex parte application and extends Defendants' response date to June 9, 2024. The Court finds that Graybill has not met his burden on demonstrating that notice need not be given to Defendants. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Motion for Leave. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 04/25/2024)
2024-04-2517PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 6/9/2024 re Amended Complaint 8 15 served on April 25, 2024. (Cronin, Sarah) (Entered: 04/25/2024)
2024-04-2818DECLARATION AND MOTION for Court Ordered Protection filed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill. (gk) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
2024-04-2819MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE MAAME EWUSI-MEMSAH FRIMPONG filed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill. (yl) (Entered: 04/30/2024)
2024-05-0120SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENT INTO EVIDENCE-AFFIDAVIT filed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill (yl) (Entered: 05/03/2024)
2024-05-0121PROOF OF SERVICE FOR EVIDENCE SUBMITTED ON 5/1/2024 filed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill. The Submission of Document into Evidence-Affidavit served on 5/1/2024. (yl) (Entered: 05/03/2024)
2024-05-0922Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave [ECF No. 18] and Motion to Disqualify [ECF No. 19] by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that Graybill has failed to show that this Court's impartiality might reasonably be questioned and accordingly denies the disqualification motion. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 05/10/2024)
2024-05-3123EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 7/9/2024 re Amended Complaint 8 filed by Defendants Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 POS) (Attorney Sarah L Cronin added to party Central Intelligence Agency(pty:dft)) (Cronin, Sarah) (Entered: 05/31/2024)
2024-06-0624Order Granting Defendants' Time to Respond to Complaint [ECF No. 23 ] by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court finds that a limited 30-day extension at this point is warranted and would not significantly delay the case. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' ex parte application and extends Defendants' response date to July 9, 2024. (See documents for further details) (yl) (Entered: 06/07/2024)
2024-06-1625DECLARATION filed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill. (yl) (Entered: 06/18/2024)
2024-06-2026MOTION TO SCHEDULE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Plaintiff Michael Robert Graybill. (yl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/21/2024: # 1 Proposed Order) (yl). (Entered: 06/21/2024)
2024-06-2727(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Motion to Schedule Initial Case Management Conference ECF No. 26 . Pursuant to the Court's Civil Standing Order, "absent unusual circumstances, scheduling conferences will not be set until an answer has been filed." Civil Standing Order at 3. As Plaintiff has not set forth any unusual circumstances requiring a status conference before a response to the Complaint has been filed, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dbe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/27/2024)
Hide Docket Events
by FOIA Project Staff
Skip to toolbar