FOIA Activity: 5 New Procedural or Substantive Decisions

We have added 5 decisions of a procedural or substantive nature filed between October 27, 2019 and November 2, 2019. These are associated with 5 FOIA cases pending in federal district court. Note that because there can be delays between the date a decision is made and when it shows up on PACER, this listing includes only decisions that appeared on PACER during this period.

Click on the date to view the full text of the decision. Click on a case title below to view other details for that case, including links to the docket report and complaint.

1. DC 1:2007cv02050 — BLOCHE et al v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al

   • October 29, 2019: MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part [110] Defendants' renewed motion for partial summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part [96] Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment; denying [97] Plaintiffs' cross-motion for partial summary judgment. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on October 29, 2019. (lcrc3)
2. DC 1:2018cv03127 — DBW PARTNERS, LLC v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al

   • October 28, 2019: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION denying [11] Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part [12] Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 10/28/2019. (lcrc2)
3. DC 1:2019cv03167 — JEMERIGBE v. TRUMP et al

   • October 31, 2019: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 10/31/2019. (zad)
4. MOW 4:2019cv00493 — Talley v. U.S. Department of Labor

   • October 28, 2019: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND REVERSE ORDER GRANTING DOL MOTION TO STAY, [13] Signed on 10/28/19 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes Mitra, Renea)
5. WAW 2:2019cv00334 — Davis Wright Tremaine LLP v. United States Customs and Border Protection

   • November 1, 2019: JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND ORDER re [18] Joint Status Report. The parties intend to continue discussions regarding what issues may remain in this case. The parties propose to file a proposed summary judgment briefing schedule within 90 days of this Court's order if they are not able to otherwise resolve this matter. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)